UK Employment Appeal Tribunal rules Uber drivers as "workers" in London
In Uber BV and others v Aslam and others [2018] IRLR 97 EAT, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) held that Uber drivers are 'workers' for the purposes of statutory employment …
Platform economy database
Database of initiatives and court cases in the EU
Eurofound’s platform economy database provides information on 443 initiatives and court cases that exist or have been implemented in relation to activities in the platform economy. The database was last updated in November 2025 and provides metadata for each entry, such as geographical scope, year, type of initiative, actors involved, sector and companies concerned. Initiatives include legal instruments such as legislative changes or court decisions, as well as voluntary interventions undertaken by different stakeholders to address issues around platform work.
Search
The database currently contains 443 entries and was last updated in November 2025.
Tag
Active
The employment tribunal case Dewhurst v CitySprint UK Ltd follows a similar precedent to Aslam, Farrar & Others v Uber, addressing worker rights in the gig economy. Margaret Dewhurst, a cycle courier for CitySprint, claimed she was a "worker" rather than self-employed and sought holiday pay. The tribunal ruled in her favour, emphasising CitySprint's control over her work and the unrealistic nature of the contract’s substitution clause. This case reinforces ongoing legal challenges regarding employment status in the gig economy, with further appeals and judgements expected. The Tribunal judges that the claimant (Ms. M. Dewhurst) was a worker of Citysprint and that it unlawfully failed to pay her for two days' holiday.
Judgment of Employment Tribunal in Dewhurst v Citysprint UK Ltd
In Uber BV and others v Aslam and others [2018] IRLR 97 EAT, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) held that Uber drivers are 'workers' for the purposes of statutory employment …