Description
The employment tribunal case Dewhurst v CitySprint UK Ltd follows a similar precedent to Aslam, Farrar & Others v Uber, addressing worker rights in the gig economy. Margaret Dewhurst, a cycle courier for CitySprint, claimed she was a "worker" rather than self-employed and sought holiday pay. The tribunal ruled in her favour, emphasising CitySprint's control over her work and the unrealistic nature of the contract’s substitution clause.
This case reinforces ongoing legal challenges regarding employment status in the gig economy, with further appeals and judgements expected.
The Tribunal judges that the claimant (Ms. M. Dewhurst) was a worker of Citysprint and that it unlawfully failed to pay her for two days' holiday.
Judgment of Employment Tribunal in Dewhurst v Citysprint UK Ltd
- Keywords
-
employment status
- Actors
-
Other,
Court
- Sector
-
Transportation and storage
- Platforms
-
Citysprint
Sources
-
In Uber BV and others v Aslam and others [2018] IRLR 97 EAT, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) held that Uber drivers are 'workers' for the purposes of statutory employment …