Description
The judgment of the Employment Court No. 1 of Pamplona has ruled that between the digital labour platform Glovo and its delivery riders there is an employment relationship, and that the drivers are not self-employed workers, as stated by the company.
The riders argued that Glovo exercises control over their work through a rating system, which affects their ability to select hours and earn a living. Additionally, the riders claimed that Glovo's system of assigning tasks and monitoring performance in real-time is an example of controlling, where algorithms ensure objectives are met and activities comply with standards.
The lawsuit was filed by 206 Glovo delivery workers and the trade union confederation CCOO.
Motivation for ruling in favour of employee status:**
-
Control and supervision: Glovo exercises real-time control through its platform.
-
Limited autonomy: Riders' freedom is mostly theoretical, with real restrictions in practice.
-
Employer sanctions: Ability to penalise riders for performance issues.
-
Dependency and organisation: Work is organised and controlled by Glovo, not independent.
-
Non-exclusivity not proven: No significant evidence of riders working for other companies in a similar capacity.
- Keywords
-
platform characteristics and business model,
employment status
- Actors
-
Platform,
Individual worker,
Government,
Court
- Sector
-
Transportation and storage
Sources