- Date
- 26 February 2026
- Country
-
Norway
-
Geographical scope
- Regional
- Type
-
Description
On 24 February 2026, the Borgarting Court of Appeal (Borgarting lagmannsrett) delivered a landmark judgement in the case of Wolt Norway AS vs. three couriers (Case No. 25-094406ASD-BORG/02). Reversing a previous decision by the Oslo District Court, the majority of the Court of Appeal ruled that the workers are independent contractors, not employees.
The core of the assessment is the degree of dependence and subordination—that is, how freely the couriers actually operate in relation to Wolt’s management and control.
The court's decision rested on several key factors:
-
Operational Freedom: Workers have the total discretion to decide when and how much they work, even after logging into the platform.
-
Right of Refusal: Workers can decline assignments without providing reasons and without facing negative consequences for future task allocations.
-
Lack of Exclusivity: Workers are permitted to perform tasks for competing platforms simultaneously.
-
Provision of Equipment: Workers are responsible for providing their own essential tools, including transport, mobile phones, and clothing.
While the court acknowledged some level of platform control, it determined that such oversight did not exceed what is typical for independent service agreements. Consequently, the workers are not entitled to the statutory protections afforded to employees under the Working Environment Act, such as holiday pay, sick leave, or pension contributions.
The case was first heard by the Oslo District Court, which on 4 April 2025 ruled in favour of the couriers: they were considered employees. The District Court determined employment percentages and ordered Wolt to pay overtime compensation, holiday pay, holiday allowance, compensation for non-economic loss, and to retroactively include the couriers in the pension scheme. Wolt appealed, and the Court of Appeal completely reversed the outcome. Wolt was acquitted. Each party was ordered to bear their own legal costs in both instances.
- Keywords
-
algorithmic management,
employment status
- Actors
-
Individual worker,
Employee organisation,
Court
- Sector
-
Transportation and storage
- Platforms
-
Wolt
Sources