Description
On 26 May 2017, the Court of Rome overturned its earlier decision to ban UberBlack nationwide. This followed a decision of Parliament with the Lanzillotta amendment, to suspend provisions in national law governing the taxi and rental sector with drivers.
Earlier in 2017, the Court of Rome had issued an order intending to block the Uber Black service throughout Italy due to claims of unfair competition from taxi associations. The Italian Parliament intervened bypassing the "Lanzillotta amendment" as part of a decree (known as "decreto milleproroghe"). This amendment suspended the application of certain restrictive provisions of the law governing non-scheduled public transport (like taxis and rentals with drivers - NCC) until the end of 2017.
Following Parliament's action, the Court of Rome, on May 26, 2017, accepted Uber's appeal ("reclamo") and revoked its previous order. The court's decision explicitly implemented the parliamentary suspension mandated by the Lanzillotta amendment.
To be noted that the court's decision to lift the ban wasn't a reassessment of Uber's legality at that moment, but rather an act of compliance with Parliament. Since the Lanzillotta amendment had temporarily paused enforcement of the relevant taxi and rental-with-driver regulations, the court adjusted its ruling accordingly
Ruling 26/5/2017 n. 25857/2017 R.G
- Keywords
-
sector aspects, competition, lobbying
- Actors
-
Court
- Sector
-
Transportation and storage
- Platforms
-
Uber
Sources
-
On 7 April 2017, the Court of Rome the court ordered a halt to Uber's services across Italy, specifically including Uber Black and potentially other services like Lux, Suv, Van, …