Description
The District Court of Amsterdam ruled that a rider working for Deliveroo was not an employee but a self-employed contractor. The rider claimed he was employed by Deliveroo despite signing a self-employed contract, as his manner of working suggested a potential relationship of authority or control similar to that found in traditional employment.
Motivation for Ruling:
-
Contractual Agreement: Clear intention for self-employment.
-
Autonomy: Ability to choose work hours and accept or refuse orders.
-
Independence: Allowed to work for competitors and use own equipment.
-
Lack of Authority: No relationship of authority typical of employment.
The ruling acknowledged the evolving nature of employment relationships within the platform economy and highlighted the need for legislative action to address such situations.
Dutch: De overeenkomst die een bezorger sloot met Deliveroo geldt niet als arbeidscontract – en dus is de man niet in loondienst bij het bezorgbedrijf.
Link to court ruling
- Keywords
-
employment status
- Actors
-
Individual worker,
Court
- Sector
-
Transportation and storage
- Platforms
-
Deliveroo