Phase
Employment protection act (1982:80)
Native name
Lag (1982:80) om Anställningsskydd
Type
Reemployment obligation after restructuring
Added to database
08 May 2015

Article

25, 26


Description

If the employer, after a dismissal (both individual and collective), subsequently recruits staff, employment must first be offered to the previously dismissed workers.

This applies to permanently employed workers as well as workers with fixed-term contracts, on the condition that they have been employed for more than 12 months in total over the past three years (or six months over the past two years for seasonal employment) and that the worker meets the required qualifications. 

The right of priority applies for up to nine months after dismissal. Employees eligible for possible rehiring must be informed of the details in their written notice.

Reemployment must be done in accordance with seniority. In other words, the rehiring order is determined by length of previous service. If two or more employees have been employed for an equally long time, the elder or the eldest employee is prioritised. 

A new prerequisite introduced in the amendment to the law entered into force on 30 June 2022 for re-employment is that the employee has sufficient qualifications for the new position. As previously, the employee also has to have been employed for a sufficient period of employment with the employer. The total period of employment shall be more than twelve months in the last three years, or * in the case of fixed-term employment, for a total of more than nine months during the last three years, or * in the case of seasonal employment for a former seasonal worker, for a total of more than six months in the last two years.

The worker is considered sufficiently qualified for the new task if it does not take more than six months to learn the job.


Commentary

Since the introduction of the Employment protection act in the mid-1970s, the Swedish labour market has gone through major transformations. For instance, temporary work agencies have become common. This means that new ways to circumvent the right to reemployment have arisen. One such case where an employer hired staff during the period when previous employees had a right to be reemployed, sparked an intense debate in the early 2000s. In this case (AD 2003 No. 4), the labour court concluded that it was not a matter of circumvention. However, the court pointed out that the circumvention of the Employment protection act is a complicated issue and that there are circumstances where hiring of staff can be considered an unauthorised circumvention of the priority rules.


Additional metadata

Cost covered by
None
Involved actors other than national government
National government
Involvement (others)
None
Thresholds
Affected employees: No, applicable in all circumstances
Company size: No, applicable in all circumstances
Additional information: No, applicable in all circumstances

Sources

Citation

Eurofound (2015), Sweden: Reemployment obligation after restructuring, Restructuring legislation database, Dublin, https://apps.eurofound.europa.eu/legislationdb/reemployment-obligation-after-restructuring/sweden

Download as PDF