Eurofound's ERM database on restructuring-related legal regulations provides
information on regulations in the Member States of the European Union and Norway
which are explicitly or implicitly linked to anticipating and managing change.
Sweden: Reemployment obligation after restructuring
Phase
Employment protection act (1982:80)
Native name
Lag (1982:80) om Anställningsskydd
Type
Reemployment obligation after restructuring
Added to database
08 May 2015
Article
25, 26
Description
If the employer, after a dismissal (both individual and collective), subsequently recruits staff, employment must first be offered to the previously dismissed workers.
This applies to permanently employed workers as well as workers with fixed-term contracts, on the condition that they have been employed for more than 12 months in total over the past three years (or six months over the past two years for seasonal employment) and that the worker meets the required qualifications.
The right of priority applies for up to nine months after dismissal. Employees eligible for possible rehiring must be informed of the details in their written notice.
Reemployment must be done in accordance with seniority. In other words, the rehiring order is determined by length of previous service. If two or more employees have been employed for an equally long time, the elder or the eldest employee is prioritised.
A new prerequisite introduced in the amendment to the law entered into force on 30 June 2022 for re-employment is that the employee has sufficient qualifications for the new position. As previously, the employee also has to have been employed for a sufficient period of employment with the employer. The total period of employment shall be more than twelve months in the last three years, or
in the case of fixed-term employment, for a total of more than nine months during the last three years, or
in the case of seasonal employment for a former seasonal worker, for a total of more than six months in the last two years.
The worker is considered sufficiently qualified for the new task if it does not take more than six months to learn the job.
Commentary
Since the introduction of the Employment protection act in the mid-1970s, the Swedish labour market has gone through major transformations. For instance, temporary work agencies have become common. This means that new ways to circumvent the right to reemployment have arisen. One such case where an employer hired staff during the period when previous employees had a right to be reemployed, sparked an intense debate in the early 2000s. In this case (AD 2003 No. 4), the labour court concluded that it was not a matter of circumvention. However, the court pointed out that the circumvention of the Employment protection act is a complicated issue and that there are circumstances where hiring of staff can be considered an unauthorised circumvention of the priority rules.
Additional metadata
Cost covered by
None
Involved actors other than national government
National government
Involvement (others)
None
Thresholds
Affected employees: No, applicable in all circumstances Company size: No, applicable in all circumstances Additional information: No, applicable in all circumstances
Sources
Storrie, D. (2005), 'Collective dismissals in Belgium, France, Germany, Sweden and the UK: Some legal, institutional and policy perspectives', Working paper from the MIRE project
Watson, W. (2006), 'Employment terms and conditions report Europe', Volume I, Brussels, Belgium
This Eurofound research paper explores key trends in restructuring in recent years, highlighting the companies that announced the largest job losses and job gains in the EU. It builds on an analysis of company announcements recorded in Eurofound’s European Restructuring Monitor (ERM), alongside a new classification of restructuring events involving changes in company location.
Employers increasingly use tools such as email, SMS and messaging apps like WhatsApp or Signal to communicate with employees. While these technologies offer both efficiency and convenience, their use in communicating sensitive information, particularly for notifying employees of dismissal, raises legal concerns. This article explores the legal framework on dismissals across the EU, with a special focus on the use of digital means for communicating employment dismissals. Drawing on examples from various Member States, it examines the legal validity of digital dismissals.
In 2023, thousands of workers in big tech lost their jobs. Meta, Amazon, Google, Apple, Microsoft and Salesforce had been considered to offer good and secure jobs up to this point. Giants of the information and communication technology (ICT) sector, these companies are among the highest paying, with Eurostat data from 2022 indicating that workers in ICT had the second-highest median gross hourly earnings (surpassed only by earnings in the financial sector).[1] These layoffs were a shock, especially as the biggest companies had hired extensively during the COVID-19 pandemic. What happened in the two years after this redundancy wave – was that the end of the cuts or did the companies start expanding again?
In 2024, the automotive sector in the EU came to the fore in public and policy discussions. The focus was on the slowdown in electric vehicle (EV) sales, rising global competition, belated investments in new technologies, and the potential closure of production lines in Europe. A number of European car manufacturers and suppliers announced their intention to make large-scale redundancies and change long-standing collective agreements on job security and wages, while workers raised concerns amid demonstrations and industrial action.