Eurofound's ERM database on restructuring-related legal regulations provides
information on regulations in the Member States of the European Union and Norway
which are explicitly or implicitly linked to anticipating and managing change.
Poland: Reemployment obligation after restructuring
Phase
Act of 13.03.2003 on special principles of termination of employment contracts with employees for reasons not related to employees - 'Collective Dismissals Act';
Act of 23.04.1964 -Civil Code;
Act of 26.06.1974 -Labour Code
Native name
Ustawa z dnia 13.03.2003 r. o szczególnych zasadach rozwiązywania z pracownikami stosunków pracy z przyczyn niedotyczących pracowników;
Ustawa z dnia 23.04.1964 r. - Kodeks cywilny;
Ustawa z dnia 26.06.1974 r. - Kodeks pracy
Type
Reemployment obligation after restructuring
Added to database
08 May 2015
Article
Article 9 of the Act of 13.03.2003 on special principles of termination of employment contracts with employees for reasons not related to employees - 'Collective Dismissals Act';
Article 471 of the Act of 23.04.1964 -Civil Code;
Article 300 of the Act of 26.06.1974 -Labour Code
Description
There is an obligation to reemploy a person who has been laid off as a part of a collective dismissal process (within 30 days, dismissals of at least 10 workers in companies with 20-99 employees, at least 10% of workforce in firms with 100-299 employees or at least 30 dismissals in larger companies), if the former employer wants to employ any new persons (because of need for new staff or need to replace a person who has retired) in the same employment category in a period of 15 months following the collective redundancies.
The duration of reemployment obligation is not connected with tenure of the affected employee prior to dismissal. The duration of reemployment obligation can be extended in agreement with the trade union but this is not a common solution. Recruiting does not guarantee the employee the same type of contract, position, working conditions and pay as he/she had before.
Violation of the obligation to reemployment results in the possibility of claiming compensation from the employer on the basis of article 471 of the Civil Code in connection with the article 300 of the Labour Code.
Commentary
There is no empirical research about the functioning of article 9 of the Collective Dismissals Act.
Additional metadata
Cost covered by
None
Involved actors other than national government
Other
Involvement (others)
Employer
Thresholds
Affected employees: 10 Company size: 20 Additional information: No, applicable in all circumstances
This Eurofound research paper explores key trends in restructuring in recent years, highlighting the companies that announced the largest job losses and job gains in the EU. It builds on an analysis of company announcements recorded in Eurofound’s European Restructuring Monitor (ERM), alongside a new classification of restructuring events involving changes in company location.
Employers increasingly use tools such as email, SMS and messaging apps like WhatsApp or Signal to communicate with employees. While these technologies offer both efficiency and convenience, their use in communicating sensitive information, particularly for notifying employees of dismissal, raises legal concerns. This article explores the legal framework on dismissals across the EU, with a special focus on the use of digital means for communicating employment dismissals. Drawing on examples from various Member States, it examines the legal validity of digital dismissals.
In 2023, thousands of workers in big tech lost their jobs. Meta, Amazon, Google, Apple, Microsoft and Salesforce had been considered to offer good and secure jobs up to this point. Giants of the information and communication technology (ICT) sector, these companies are among the highest paying, with Eurostat data from 2022 indicating that workers in ICT had the second-highest median gross hourly earnings (surpassed only by earnings in the financial sector).[1] These layoffs were a shock, especially as the biggest companies had hired extensively during the COVID-19 pandemic. What happened in the two years after this redundancy wave – was that the end of the cuts or did the companies start expanding again?
In 2024, the automotive sector in the EU came to the fore in public and policy discussions. The focus was on the slowdown in electric vehicle (EV) sales, rising global competition, belated investments in new technologies, and the potential closure of production lines in Europe. A number of European car manufacturers and suppliers announced their intention to make large-scale redundancies and change long-standing collective agreements on job security and wages, while workers raised concerns amid demonstrations and industrial action.