Eurofound's ERM database on restructuring-related legal regulations provides
information on regulations in the Member States of the European Union and Norway
which are explicitly or implicitly linked to anticipating and managing change.
Cyprus: Reemployment obligation after restructuring
Phase
Collective Dismissals Law of 2001 (Law 28 (I)/2001); Termination of Employment Law of 1967 (Law 24/1967)
Native name
Ν. 28(I)/2001 - Ο περί Ομαδικών Απολύσεων Νόμος του 2001; Ν. 24/1967 - Ο περί Τερματισμού Απασχολήσεως Νόμος του 1967
Type
Reemployment obligation after restructuring
Added to database
08 May 2015
Article
Article 4 of the Collective Dismissals Law of 2001 Law 28 (I)/2001; Article 22 of the Termination of Employment Law, 1967 (Law 24/1967) as amended
Description
According to Article 4 the Collective Dismissals Law of 2001, employers intending to proceed with collective dismissals (within 30 days, dismissals of at least 10 workers in companies with 21-99 employees, 10% in firms with 100-299 employees or at least 30 workers in firms with 300 or more staff) are obliged to timely enter into consultations with the employees' representatives aiming at designing social measures with the target of reaching an agreement. The consultations should at least cover the following issues:
Possible ways and means for avoiding collective dismissals or the reduction of number of employees affected, and
ways and means for lessening the impact of collective dismissals, by designing social measures, which should, among others, have the target of reemployment or retraining of dismissed employees.
The Termination of Employment Law of 1967 is more specific as far as reemployment is concerned. According to Article 22, a redundant employee has the right to reemployment if the employer who proceeded with redundancies is planning to increase employment again within 8 months since the redundancies took place. If the employer is looking for the same type of employees with the same skills as those who were made redundant, he/she is obliged to give preference to redundant employees.
Commentary
The Termination of Employment Law regulates also the operation of the Redundancy Fund and Redundancy Payments. The fund is administered by the Social Security Services. If the Social Security Services take notice of increased employment by an employer who proceeded in the last 8 months to redundancies, he/she is then asked to provide explanations for not re-employing the redundant employee(s).
This provision of the Termination of Employment Law is partly causing delays to redundancy payments since the authorities begin to process the applications after the 8 months period has elapsed in order to make sure the employer has not proceeded with the replacement of the redundant employees thereby violating the reemployment obligation.
Trade unions report that reemployment is in many cases successfully negotiated, however no exact data are available.
Additional metadata
Cost covered by
None
Involved actors other than national government
Trade union
Other
Involvement (others)
Social Security Services
Thresholds
Affected employees: No, applicable in all circumstances Company size: No, applicable in all circumstances Additional information: No, applicable in all circumstances
This Eurofound research paper explores key trends in restructuring in recent years, highlighting the companies that announced the largest job losses and job gains in the EU. It builds on an analysis of company announcements recorded in Eurofound’s European Restructuring Monitor (ERM), alongside a new classification of restructuring events involving changes in company location.
Employers increasingly use tools such as email, SMS and messaging apps like WhatsApp or Signal to communicate with employees. While these technologies offer both efficiency and convenience, their use in communicating sensitive information, particularly for notifying employees of dismissal, raises legal concerns. This article explores the legal framework on dismissals across the EU, with a special focus on the use of digital means for communicating employment dismissals. Drawing on examples from various Member States, it examines the legal validity of digital dismissals.
In 2023, thousands of workers in big tech lost their jobs. Meta, Amazon, Google, Apple, Microsoft and Salesforce had been considered to offer good and secure jobs up to this point. Giants of the information and communication technology (ICT) sector, these companies are among the highest paying, with Eurostat data from 2022 indicating that workers in ICT had the second-highest median gross hourly earnings (surpassed only by earnings in the financial sector).[1] These layoffs were a shock, especially as the biggest companies had hired extensively during the COVID-19 pandemic. What happened in the two years after this redundancy wave – was that the end of the cuts or did the companies start expanding again?
In 2024, the automotive sector in the EU came to the fore in public and policy discussions. The focus was on the slowdown in electric vehicle (EV) sales, rising global competition, belated investments in new technologies, and the potential closure of production lines in Europe. A number of European car manufacturers and suppliers announced their intention to make large-scale redundancies and change long-standing collective agreements on job security and wages, while workers raised concerns amid demonstrations and industrial action.