European Restructuring Monitor (ERM)
Eurofound's ERM database on restructuring-related legal regulations provides information on regulations in the Member States of the European Union and Norway which are explicitly or implicitly linked to anticipating and managing change.
Article 115
Article 115 stipulates that an employer can terminate an employment contract for legitimate reasons by giving either the statutory notice or the notice stated in the contract of employment (regular notice of dismissal). Among others, grounds for dismissal include cancellation due to business reasons, where there is no longer the need to perform certain work due to economic, technological or organisational reasons. If dismissals happen for business reasons, the employer cannot employ another employee for the same position for six months after the date of the dismissal notice. In case there is a need for employment in the same position within these six months, the employer must offer an employment contract to the employee dismissed for business reasons.
Accordingly, an employer who has made a regular termination of employment contract cannot employ other employees for these positions for at least six months. The obligation is valid also in cases of collective dismissals with the respective thresholds, pursuant to article 127. If there is a need for employees in the same positions within a period of six months from the redundancies, employers are obliged to offer employment contracts first to the employees dismissed for business reasons.
Judicial practice recognises several causes as justified reasons for cancellation due to business reasons, including market downsizing, reduction in the scope of activities and non-profitability of a certain activity and/or an individual job position. There are no legally prescribed control mechanisms to track whether an employer first offers jobs to employees made redundant within six months of the redundancy.
Information on employment flows within the company must be made available to the works council, provided that the number of employees in the company from the date of dismissal to the date of reemployment has not fallen below 20 (as the establishment of a works council is a right in companies with at least 20 employees). Provided that the works council still exists, it can report to the public authorities on the compliance of the employer to these legal provisions. Otherwise, redundant employees can find out informally from former colleagues whether new employees were employed for their positions within six months following their dismissal and check this information with the public employment service which retains an updated register of employment.
The law does not specify the consequences for non-compliance. Under article 228 (23), an employer is fined from €1,320 to €3,980 for serious (major) offences, if before the expiration of a period of six months from the date of delivery of the decision on dismissal, he or she employs another worker in the same jobs, and he or she has not offered to conclude an employment contract with the worker whom he or she dismissed for business-conditioned reasons (Article 115, paragraphs 5 and 6).
Eurofound (2015), Croatia: Reemployment obligation after restructuring, Restructuring legislation database, Dublin, https://apps.eurofound.europa.eu/legislationdb/reemployment-obligation-after-restructuring/croatia
This Eurofound research paper explores key trends in restructuring in recent years, highlighting the companies that announced the largest job losses and job gains in the EU. It builds on an analysis of company announcements recorded in Eurofound’s European Restructuring Monitor (ERM), alongside a new classification of restructuring events involving changes in company location.
:quality(80))
Employers increasingly use tools such as email, SMS and messaging apps like WhatsApp or Signal to communicate with employees. While these technologies offer both efficiency and convenience, their use in communicating sensitive information, particularly for notifying employees of dismissal, raises legal concerns. This article explores the legal framework on dismissals across the EU, with a special focus on the use of digital means for communicating employment dismissals. Drawing on examples from various Member States, it examines the legal validity of digital dismissals.
:quality(80))
In 2023, thousands of workers in big tech lost their jobs. Meta, Amazon, Google, Apple, Microsoft and Salesforce had been considered to offer good and secure jobs up to this point. Giants of the information and communication technology (ICT) sector, these companies are among the highest paying, with Eurostat data from 2022 indicating that workers in ICT had the second-highest median gross hourly earnings (surpassed only by earnings in the financial sector).[1] These layoffs were a shock, especially as the biggest companies had hired extensively during the COVID-19 pandemic. What happened in the two years after this redundancy wave – was that the end of the cuts or did the companies start expanding again?
:quality(80))
In 2024, the automotive sector in the EU came to the fore in public and policy discussions. The focus was on the slowdown in electric vehicle (EV) sales, rising global competition, belated investments in new technologies, and the potential closure of production lines in Europe. A number of European car manufacturers and suppliers announced their intention to make large-scale redundancies and change long-standing collective agreements on job security and wages, while workers raised concerns amid demonstrations and industrial action.
:quality(80))