Eurofound's ERM database on restructuring-related legal regulations provides
information on regulations in the Member States of the European Union and Norway
which are explicitly or implicitly linked to anticipating and managing change.
Germany: Employers obligation to support redundant employees
Phase
Works Constitution Act
Native name
Betriebsverfassungsgesetz
Type
Employers obligation to support redundant employees
Added to database
11 May 2015
Article
112: Reconciliation of interests in the case of alterations; social compensation plan
112a: Enforceable social compensation plan in the event of staff cutbacks, establishment of new businesses
113 Indemnities
Description
If an alteration to the business is proposed, the employer must agree with the works council on a social compensation plan (Sozialplan) to compensate those employees dismissed as a result of collective redundancies (dismissal of at least 6 employees in companies with 21-59 workers, at least 10% (or 26) in companies with 60-499 workers, or at least 30 dismissals in larger firms) as well as those employees that remain behind and are affected by the alterations to the business. Following a ruling by the Federal Labour Court from 2015, the social plan shall in particular cover workers at risk of unemployment and pay, for example, for the transfer to a training agency and for the training costs. To-be-dismissed civil servants working in a privatised company are not eligible because they have a guarantee of reemployment.
The contents of the social plan will be negotiated with regard to the information and proposals set out in a balance-of-interests agreement (Interessenausgleich).
The provisions under the social plan are enforceable by law.
If a social plan cannot be agreed upon, the employer or the works council may turn to the Federal Employment Agency (Bundesagentur für Arbeit) for mediation and a mediation committee will be set up. The committee comprises a representative from the employer and one from the works council side and is typically chaired by a judge of a local or regional labour court. This committee will draw up a social plan if the employer and works council fail to reach an agreement taking into account the social well-being of the affected employees as well as the financial situation of the employer. In case the committee's decision unilaterally follows the employer's propositions, a complaint can be filed with the labour court and the decision can be ruled unlawful.
The employees shall be offered financial compensation for weathering economic disadvantages, such as reductions in income or allowances. Compensation shall also be proportionate to their prospects of finding alternative employment.
A social plan is not mandatory during the first four years of a newly founded company (other than those formed by the reorganisation of existing firms or groups).
Commentary
A social plan usually includes termination payments for which there is no legal minimum or maximum. Often, these are calculated on the following basis: length of service multiplied with monthly gross salary multiplied with a certain factor (ranging from 0.5-1.5, depending on the economic strength of the firm and often also taking into account the age of the employee). Apart from financial compensation, the social plan can also arrange for support in finding new employment by providing training or job transfer measures.
This Eurofound research paper explores key trends in restructuring in recent years, highlighting the companies that announced the largest job losses and job gains in the EU. It builds on an analysis of company announcements recorded in Eurofound’s European Restructuring Monitor (ERM), alongside a new classification of restructuring events involving changes in company location.
Employers increasingly use tools such as email, SMS and messaging apps like WhatsApp or Signal to communicate with employees. While these technologies offer both efficiency and convenience, their use in communicating sensitive information, particularly for notifying employees of dismissal, raises legal concerns. This article explores the legal framework on dismissals across the EU, with a special focus on the use of digital means for communicating employment dismissals. Drawing on examples from various Member States, it examines the legal validity of digital dismissals.
In 2023, thousands of workers in big tech lost their jobs. Meta, Amazon, Google, Apple, Microsoft and Salesforce had been considered to offer good and secure jobs up to this point. Giants of the information and communication technology (ICT) sector, these companies are among the highest paying, with Eurostat data from 2022 indicating that workers in ICT had the second-highest median gross hourly earnings (surpassed only by earnings in the financial sector).[1] These layoffs were a shock, especially as the biggest companies had hired extensively during the COVID-19 pandemic. What happened in the two years after this redundancy wave – was that the end of the cuts or did the companies start expanding again?
In 2024, the automotive sector in the EU came to the fore in public and policy discussions. The focus was on the slowdown in electric vehicle (EV) sales, rising global competition, belated investments in new technologies, and the potential closure of production lines in Europe. A number of European car manufacturers and suppliers announced their intention to make large-scale redundancies and change long-standing collective agreements on job security and wages, while workers raised concerns amid demonstrations and industrial action.