Eurofound's ERM database on restructuring-related legal regulations provides
information on regulations in the Member States of the European Union and Norway
which are explicitly or implicitly linked to anticipating and managing change.
Austria: Employers obligation to provide skill development plans or training
Phase
Labour Constitution Act (ArbVG)
Native name
Arbeitsverfassungsgesetz (ArbVG)
Type
Employers obligation to provide skill development plans or training
Added to database
17 August 2025
Article
§ 11b AVRAG
Description
Objective
The amendment to the Austrian Arbeitsvertragsrechts-Anpassungsgesetz (AVRAG) in 2024 aims to strengthen employee protection with regard to training obligations and to align Austrian law with Directive (EU) 2019/1152 on transparent and predictable working conditions. The main goal is to prevent workers from facing financial or working time disadvantages when required to participate in training necessary for performing their agreed duties. This measure reflects the broader European policy goal of fostering fair working conditions and supporting continuous skill development within a predictable and secure framework.
The legislation establishes the following:
Participation in legally, collectively or contractually required training must be regarded as working time.
All associated costs must be covered by the employer unless a third party (e.g. a public body) is paying for it.
Employers are prohibited from recovering training expenses from employees, either directly or through deductions from remuneration.
The rule applies not only to initial qualification but also to the maintenance and renewal of professional licences or certifications necessary for the performance of agreed duties.
This provision does not prevent more favourable arrangements for employees being made through collective or contractual agreements.
Outcomes/expected impact
The reform enhances legal certainty for both parties to the employment relationship. Employees benefit from clear rights to free, employer-funded training that is recognised as working time, while employers gain clarity on their obligations. More broadly, it is expected that the measure will support workforce adaptability, facilitate compliance with legal and professional standards, and promote transparent and predictable working conditions, in line with EU requirements.
Commentary
Whether a specific training, further education, or professional development falls under § 11b AVRAG is determined on a case-by-case basis. The decisive factor is whether the training is required by one of the legal sources specified in the law for the performance of the employee’s contractual duties. The employment contract and, in particular, the precise description of the employee’s duties play a central role.
Healthcare professions are particularly affected. There are many regulations that apply specifically to these professions, such as the requirement for employees to undertake further training.
Social partner reactions have been cautious but generally supportive. Trade unions welcomed the clarification that training time counts as working time and that costs cannot be shifted to employees, seeing this as strengthening fairness and employability. Employers’ organisations acknowledged the legal obligation but raised concerns about potential cost burdens, particularly for smaller companies.
Additional metadata
Cost covered by
Employer
Involved actors other than national government
National government
Public employment service
Involvement (others)
None
Thresholds
Affected employees: No, applicable in all circumstances Company size: No, applicable in all circumstances Additional information: No, applicable in all circumstances
Eurofound (2025), Austria: Employers obligation to provide skill development plans or training, Restructuring legislation database, Dublin,
https://apps.eurofound.europa.eu/legislationdb/employers-obligation-to-provide-skill-development-plans-or-training/austria
This Eurofound research paper explores key trends in restructuring in recent years, highlighting the companies that announced the largest job losses and job gains in the EU. It builds on an analysis of company announcements recorded in Eurofound’s European Restructuring Monitor (ERM), alongside a new classification of restructuring events involving changes in company location.
Employers increasingly use tools such as email, SMS and messaging apps like WhatsApp or Signal to communicate with employees. While these technologies offer both efficiency and convenience, their use in communicating sensitive information, particularly for notifying employees of dismissal, raises legal concerns. This article explores the legal framework on dismissals across the EU, with a special focus on the use of digital means for communicating employment dismissals. Drawing on examples from various Member States, it examines the legal validity of digital dismissals.
In 2023, thousands of workers in big tech lost their jobs. Meta, Amazon, Google, Apple, Microsoft and Salesforce had been considered to offer good and secure jobs up to this point. Giants of the information and communication technology (ICT) sector, these companies are among the highest paying, with Eurostat data from 2022 indicating that workers in ICT had the second-highest median gross hourly earnings (surpassed only by earnings in the financial sector).[1] These layoffs were a shock, especially as the biggest companies had hired extensively during the COVID-19 pandemic. What happened in the two years after this redundancy wave – was that the end of the cuts or did the companies start expanding again?
In 2024, the automotive sector in the EU came to the fore in public and policy discussions. The focus was on the slowdown in electric vehicle (EV) sales, rising global competition, belated investments in new technologies, and the potential closure of production lines in Europe. A number of European car manufacturers and suppliers announced their intention to make large-scale redundancies and change long-standing collective agreements on job security and wages, while workers raised concerns amid demonstrations and industrial action.