Eurofound's ERM database on restructuring-related legal regulations provides
information on regulations in the Member States of the European Union and Norway
which are explicitly or implicitly linked to anticipating and managing change.
Sweden: Wage guarantee in case of insolvency
Phase
Wage guarantee act (1992:497)
Native name
Lönegarantilag (1992:497)
Type
Wage guarantee in case of insolvency
Added to database
08 May 2015
Article
Whole regulation
Description
In the case of employer insolvency, employees are eligible for wage guarantee. The wage guarantee aims at giving employees time to look for other jobs. Claims are not only guaranteed in cases of employer insolvency (permanent inability of the employer to pay the debts), but also in cases of restructuring events (current or foreseeable inability of the employer to pay the debts at due date, but there are activities to make the company survive a temporary crisis and avoid insolvency).
The wage guarantee is independent of the duration of the employment contract. It covers all claims that arose within the previous three months before registering for insolvency and one month after the decision of the insolvency court. The maximum amount per employee changes annually. To view the current maximum, visit Länsstyrelsen Stockholm. The guarantee is financed by the payroll tax and the state; there is no specific fund, but the financial means are registered as a special element in the national budget.
The benefit is paid out to employees by the Swedish government. Non-eligible workers include those who have been hired with the intervention of the public employment service and those who, alone or together with close relatives, own 20% or more of the company.
Commentary
Examples of wage costs that can be replaced by the wage guarantee
Salary for the time the employee worked before the application for business reconstruction was submitted (usually a maximum of three months), as well as salary for the first month after the decision to reconstruct;
Vacation pay for the current and the previous year (if still employed in the company);
Termination salary and vacation allowance during the termination notice period, if terminated during the reconstruction.
There have been numerous cases of fraud related to the regulation. Wage guarantee payments were originally processed by the county administrative boards. In order to improve the decision-making information base for paying agents, the government decided in 2017 (DS 2017:67) that the state would be responsible for processing wage guarantee payments.
The government can accordingly appoint the authority responsible for the payment. The amendments entered into force on 1 January 2019.
Additional metadata
Cost covered by
Employer
National government
Involved actors other than national government
Regional/local government
Involvement (others)
None
Thresholds
Affected employees: No, applicable in all circumstances Company size: No, applicable in all circumstances Additional information: No, applicable in all circumstances
Sources
Deutsch, A. (2011), Europäische Beispiele für die Insolvenzentgeltsicherung, Vienna, Federal Ministry of Labour, Social Affairs and Consumer Protection/IEF
Sargant, M. (2007), Implementation Report Directive 80/987 EEC amended by Directive 2002/74/EC [protection of employees in the event of the insolvency of their employer], Human European Consultancy/Middlesex University Business School
Eurofound (2015), Sweden: Wage guarantee in case of insolvency, Restructuring legislation database, Dublin,
https://apps.eurofound.europa.eu/legislationdb/wage-guarantee-in-case-of-insolvency/sweden
This Eurofound research paper explores key trends in restructuring in recent years, highlighting the companies that announced the largest job losses and job gains in the EU. It builds on an analysis of company announcements recorded in Eurofound’s European Restructuring Monitor (ERM), alongside a new classification of restructuring events involving changes in company location.
Employers increasingly use tools such as email, SMS and messaging apps like WhatsApp or Signal to communicate with employees. While these technologies offer both efficiency and convenience, their use in communicating sensitive information, particularly for notifying employees of dismissal, raises legal concerns. This article explores the legal framework on dismissals across the EU, with a special focus on the use of digital means for communicating employment dismissals. Drawing on examples from various Member States, it examines the legal validity of digital dismissals.
In 2023, thousands of workers in big tech lost their jobs. Meta, Amazon, Google, Apple, Microsoft and Salesforce had been considered to offer good and secure jobs up to this point. Giants of the information and communication technology (ICT) sector, these companies are among the highest paying, with Eurostat data from 2022 indicating that workers in ICT had the second-highest median gross hourly earnings (surpassed only by earnings in the financial sector).[1] These layoffs were a shock, especially as the biggest companies had hired extensively during the COVID-19 pandemic. What happened in the two years after this redundancy wave – was that the end of the cuts or did the companies start expanding again?
In 2024, the automotive sector in the EU came to the fore in public and policy discussions. The focus was on the slowdown in electric vehicle (EV) sales, rising global competition, belated investments in new technologies, and the potential closure of production lines in Europe. A number of European car manufacturers and suppliers announced their intention to make large-scale redundancies and change long-standing collective agreements on job security and wages, while workers raised concerns amid demonstrations and industrial action.