Eurofound's ERM database on restructuring-related legal regulations provides
information on regulations in the Member States of the European Union and Norway
which are explicitly or implicitly linked to anticipating and managing change.
If employees have a financial claim against an employer who is insolvent (permanently unable to fulfil its payment obligations), they can benefit from the guarantee in case of:
bankruptcy (declared by court);?- suspension of payments (surceance van betaling);
debt restructuring (if a private person, after the finalisation of bankruptcy proceedings, is still confronted with debts they are unlikely to pay in future, the debtor has to do everything possible to collect the money needed to pay creditors for three years);
permanent cessation of payments.
Eligibility
There is no minimum duration of the employment relationship in order to be eligible. Part-time and fixed-term workers are also eligible, alongside employees with permanent contracts. There are requirements in terms of the timing of the request made by the employee. The employee is required to file the request within a week after the date on which he or she normally would receive their payment or after it becomes clear the employer cannot fulfil its payment obligations (article 63 of the Unemployment Insurance Act). Domestic civil servants that usually work fewer than three days a week are excluded from the pay guarantee regulation.
Funding of the guarantee
In cases of bankruptcy, employees’ pay and unpaid premiums constitute debts which are paid directly out of the estate with preference over the claims of other creditors.
The employees have to claim the benefits from the public employment service (UWV). The maximum benefits awarded may comprise pay (over the last 13 weeks immediately preceding the date of notification of the dismissal and the period of notice for dismissal), holiday payments and holiday bonuses to which the recipient is entitled over the past year. The benefits to which employees are entitled under this regulation are determined on a monthly basis and have been maximised at 150% of the maximum daily wage , multiplied by the number of days worked. This has been done to cap employers' costs for high-wage workers. The UWV operates as the guarantee institution. Benefits are paid out of the general unemployment fund, funded by premiums paid by employees and employers. There is no direct link between payment of these premiums and the right to receive benefits. In addition to this, the employee can be eligible to receive support for payments to third parties (e.g. pension funds) if he/she is in a position to incur a financial disadvantage due to the fact that the employer has not paid such parties.
Commentary
This regulation is fairly uncontroversial and is supported by trade unions and employer organisations alike. As a consequence, it is unlikely to change in the next term of government. Figures on how often the articles are invoked are not readily available and no evaluations seem to have taken place.
Additional metadata
Cost covered by
Companies
Employee
National government
Involved actors other than national government
Public employment service
Involvement (others)
None
Thresholds
Affected employees: No, applicable in all circumstances Company size: No, applicable in all circumstances Additional information: No, applicable in all circumstances
Sargant, M., 2007, Implementation Report Directive 80/987 EEC amended by Directive 2002/74/EC [protection of employees in the event of the insolvency of their employer], Human European Consultancy/Middlesex University Business School
Eurofound (2015), Netherlands: Wage guarantee in case of insolvency, Restructuring legislation database, Dublin,
https://apps.eurofound.europa.eu/legislationdb/wage-guarantee-in-case-of-insolvency/netherlands
This Eurofound research paper explores key trends in restructuring in recent years, highlighting the companies that announced the largest job losses and job gains in the EU. It builds on an analysis of company announcements recorded in Eurofound’s European Restructuring Monitor (ERM), alongside a new classification of restructuring events involving changes in company location.
Employers increasingly use tools such as email, SMS and messaging apps like WhatsApp or Signal to communicate with employees. While these technologies offer both efficiency and convenience, their use in communicating sensitive information, particularly for notifying employees of dismissal, raises legal concerns. This article explores the legal framework on dismissals across the EU, with a special focus on the use of digital means for communicating employment dismissals. Drawing on examples from various Member States, it examines the legal validity of digital dismissals.
In 2023, thousands of workers in big tech lost their jobs. Meta, Amazon, Google, Apple, Microsoft and Salesforce had been considered to offer good and secure jobs up to this point. Giants of the information and communication technology (ICT) sector, these companies are among the highest paying, with Eurostat data from 2022 indicating that workers in ICT had the second-highest median gross hourly earnings (surpassed only by earnings in the financial sector).[1] These layoffs were a shock, especially as the biggest companies had hired extensively during the COVID-19 pandemic. What happened in the two years after this redundancy wave – was that the end of the cuts or did the companies start expanding again?
In 2024, the automotive sector in the EU came to the fore in public and policy discussions. The focus was on the slowdown in electric vehicle (EV) sales, rising global competition, belated investments in new technologies, and the potential closure of production lines in Europe. A number of European car manufacturers and suppliers announced their intention to make large-scale redundancies and change long-standing collective agreements on job security and wages, while workers raised concerns amid demonstrations and industrial action.