Eurofound's ERM database on restructuring-related legal regulations provides
information on regulations in the Member States of the European Union and Norway
which are explicitly or implicitly linked to anticipating and managing change.
France: Time off for job search
Phase
Labour code
Native name
Code du travail
Type
Time off for job search
Added to database
08 May 2015
Article
L. 1233-71 to L. 1233-76, R1233-17 to R1233-21, and R1233-22 to R1233-36
Description
In general, there is no legal provision which grants employees time off for job search during the notice period. Such provisions, however, may be part of a sectoral or a company-level agreement, or they are stipulated by common practice in the company or the unilateral agreement of the employer.
An exception to this rule applies for workers in large companies (more than 1,000 staff) who have been dismissed on economic grounds. They are eligible for time off for job search, so called redeployment leave (congé de reclassement). It is the employers’ responsibility to inform the employees concerned about the possibility to take redeployment leave and about the conditions of the suggested action (purpose, remuneration and benefits, status).
This information is provided :
either at the employee's prior dismissal interview, when the redundancy concerns fewer than 10 employees over a 30-day period;
Or at the last meeting of the work council (social and economic committee - CSE), when the redundancy involves at least 10 employees over a 30-day period.
The employer must offer the employee redeployment leave in the letter of dismissal.
Employees are given eight days to reply to this proposition. The employer is not obliged to offer redeployment leave if the company is in receivership or compulsory liquidation. In case of a positive reply, the employee’s file is treated by a specialised agency in charge of analysing the candidate’s profile, conducting an interview and suggesting suitable measures. The agency will support the employee to find a new job and can also propose some training.
The leave may last 4 to 12 months and is taken during the notice period. If the employee undergoes retraining, the duration of the redeployment leave may be extended to 24 months (instead of 12 months). If the employee is undergoing training or validation of acquired experience (VAE), the duration of the redeployment leave cannot be less than the duration of these actions, up to a maximum of 12 months.
The employee is released from any other tasks during that time. The employment contract with the employer terminates at the end of the leave or when the employee finds a new job. During this leave, employees receive their regular remuneration from the employer.
If the training leave exceeds the notice period, the employer continues to pay a part of the employee’s original wage, which may not be less than 65% of their last gross salary over a 12-month reference period and not below 85% of the current national minimum wage.
The allowance is exempt from social security contributions. However, it is subject to social security contributions (CSG at a rate of 6.20% and CRDS at a rate of 0.5%).
Commentary
In the absence of statistical monitoring by the Ministry of Labour, as indicated by the Cour des Comptes (June 2020), it is impossible to know the number of employees placed on redeployment leave, the support measures they receive or the effectiveness of the scheme in terms of a return to employment.
Additional metadata
Cost covered by
Employer
Involved actors other than national government
Works council
Involvement (others)
The employers has to inform the works council (CSE) that dismissed employees may ask for the redeployment leave.
Thresholds
Affected employees: 1000 Company size: No, applicable in all circumstances Additional information: No, applicable in all circumstances
Eurofound (2015), France: Time off for job search, Restructuring legislation database, Dublin,
https://apps.eurofound.europa.eu/legislationdb/time-off-for-job-search/france
This Eurofound research paper explores key trends in restructuring in recent years, highlighting the companies that announced the largest job losses and job gains in the EU. It builds on an analysis of company announcements recorded in Eurofound’s European Restructuring Monitor (ERM), alongside a new classification of restructuring events involving changes in company location.
Employers increasingly use tools such as email, SMS and messaging apps like WhatsApp or Signal to communicate with employees. While these technologies offer both efficiency and convenience, their use in communicating sensitive information, particularly for notifying employees of dismissal, raises legal concerns. This article explores the legal framework on dismissals across the EU, with a special focus on the use of digital means for communicating employment dismissals. Drawing on examples from various Member States, it examines the legal validity of digital dismissals.
In 2023, thousands of workers in big tech lost their jobs. Meta, Amazon, Google, Apple, Microsoft and Salesforce had been considered to offer good and secure jobs up to this point. Giants of the information and communication technology (ICT) sector, these companies are among the highest paying, with Eurostat data from 2022 indicating that workers in ICT had the second-highest median gross hourly earnings (surpassed only by earnings in the financial sector).[1] These layoffs were a shock, especially as the biggest companies had hired extensively during the COVID-19 pandemic. What happened in the two years after this redundancy wave – was that the end of the cuts or did the companies start expanding again?
In 2024, the automotive sector in the EU came to the fore in public and policy discussions. The focus was on the slowdown in electric vehicle (EV) sales, rising global competition, belated investments in new technologies, and the potential closure of production lines in Europe. A number of European car manufacturers and suppliers announced their intention to make large-scale redundancies and change long-standing collective agreements on job security and wages, while workers raised concerns amid demonstrations and industrial action.