Eurofound's ERM database on restructuring-related legal regulations provides
information on regulations in the Member States of the European Union and Norway
which are explicitly or implicitly linked to anticipating and managing change.
Sweden: Staff information and consultation on business transfers
Lag (1982:80) om Anställningsskydd; Lag (1976:580) om Medbestämmande i Arbetslivet
Type
Staff information and consultation on business transfers
Added to database
08 May 2015
Article
6b, 7 and 25 of the Employment protection act; 28 of the Co-determination act
Description
In the framework of a transfer of an economic entity or part of an economic entity (including public sector and seagoing vessels) which retains its identity (for example, the sale of the business) the transferee has to take over all employment contracts without changing any rights and obligations of the workers for one year following the transfer. However, contracts can only be transferred with the consent of the employee in question. Employees have a right to object to being transferred within reasonable time. In this case, these employees remain in the employment of the transferor.
Both the transferor and the transferee have to inform and consult with the employee organisations before a decision to realise a transfer of undertaking is taken. If there is a collective agreement at the workplace, the trade union representatives bound by the collective agreement are to be informed and consulted. If there is no collective agreement, every trade union that has members that will be affected by the transfer need to be informed and consulted.
The consultation procedure has no fixed length, and the employee organisation does not have the right to declare void any decision of the employer.
Commentary
The legislation does not specify which information needs to be provided, but in practice this should include detailed information about the transfer and any potential restructuring of the company, including potential consequences for the employees. Collective agreements may contain additional provisions that need to be observed.
Regarding 'retention of identity after transfer', the Swedish labour court decided that necessary criteria are:
the type of business or undertaking concerned;
the similarity between the activities;
whether customers are transferred;
the duration of any interruption in the performance of the activities;
and sufficient criteria are:
whether tangible or intangible assets have been transferred;
whether the majority of employees are retained.
To qualify as a transfer of undertaking, all of the necessary and at least one of the sufficient criteria must be met.
The reform of the Employment protection act did not affect the employer's obligation to keep staff and trade unions informed in the case of business transfers.
Additional metadata
Cost covered by
None
Involved actors other than national government
Trade union
Involvement (others)
None
Thresholds
Affected employees: No, applicable in all circumstances Company size: No, applicable in all circumstances Additional information: No, applicable in all circumstances
Sources
Ius Laboris (2009), 'Transfers of undertakings guide', Brussels
Eurofound (2015), Sweden: Staff information and consultation on business transfers, Restructuring legislation database, Dublin,
https://apps.eurofound.europa.eu/legislationdb/staff-information-and-consultation-on-business-transfers/sweden
This Eurofound research paper explores key trends in restructuring in recent years, highlighting the companies that announced the largest job losses and job gains in the EU. It builds on an analysis of company announcements recorded in Eurofound’s European Restructuring Monitor (ERM), alongside a new classification of restructuring events involving changes in company location.
Employers increasingly use tools such as email, SMS and messaging apps like WhatsApp or Signal to communicate with employees. While these technologies offer both efficiency and convenience, their use in communicating sensitive information, particularly for notifying employees of dismissal, raises legal concerns. This article explores the legal framework on dismissals across the EU, with a special focus on the use of digital means for communicating employment dismissals. Drawing on examples from various Member States, it examines the legal validity of digital dismissals.
In 2023, thousands of workers in big tech lost their jobs. Meta, Amazon, Google, Apple, Microsoft and Salesforce had been considered to offer good and secure jobs up to this point. Giants of the information and communication technology (ICT) sector, these companies are among the highest paying, with Eurostat data from 2022 indicating that workers in ICT had the second-highest median gross hourly earnings (surpassed only by earnings in the financial sector).[1] These layoffs were a shock, especially as the biggest companies had hired extensively during the COVID-19 pandemic. What happened in the two years after this redundancy wave – was that the end of the cuts or did the companies start expanding again?
In 2024, the automotive sector in the EU came to the fore in public and policy discussions. The focus was on the slowdown in electric vehicle (EV) sales, rising global competition, belated investments in new technologies, and the potential closure of production lines in Europe. A number of European car manufacturers and suppliers announced their intention to make large-scale redundancies and change long-standing collective agreements on job security and wages, while workers raised concerns amid demonstrations and industrial action.