Eurofound's ERM database on restructuring-related legal regulations provides
information on regulations in the Member States of the European Union and Norway
which are explicitly or implicitly linked to anticipating and managing change.
Romania: Staff information and consultation on business transfers
Phase
Law no. 67/2006 regarding the transfer of undertakings, businesses, or parts of undertakings or businesses, published in the Official Gazette of Romania, no. 276 of 28 March 2006
Native name
Legea nr. 67/2006 privind protectia drepturilor salariatilor in cazul transferului intreprinderii, al unitatii sau al unor parti ale acestora, publicata in Monitorul Oficial al Romaniei, nr. 276 din 28 martie 2006
Type
Staff information and consultation on business transfers
Added to database
15 July 2015
Article
11, 12, 15
Description
The law defines a business transfer as the transfer of an undertaking, business or parts thereof from the ownership of the transferor to the ownership of the transferee, with the aim of continuing the main or ancillary activity, whether or not they are operating for gain. However, this does not apply if the former employer is in a state of insolvency.
The transferor and transferee shall inform in writing their employees' representatives or, if they are not set up or appointed, their employees at least 30 days before the date of transfer of:
the date or proposed date of the transfer;
the reasons for the transfer;
the legal, economic and social implications of the transfer for employees;
the measures envisaged in relation to employees;
conditions of work and employment.
The obligations shall apply irrespective of whether the decision resulting in the transfer is taken by the employer or an undertaking controlling the employer. Where the transferor or the transferee envisages measures in relation to his or her employees, he or she shall consult the representatives of the employees, with a view to reaching an agreement, at least 30 days before the date of transfer.
In the event of failure by the transferor or the transferee to comply with the obligations laid out in the law, the employees or representatives of the employees affected by the transfer may address the competent court for resolution of the labour disputes, according to the law.
Commentary
This law transposes the Council Directive 2001/23/EC of 12 March 2001 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the safeguarding of employees' rights in the event of transfers of undertakings, businesses or parts of undertakings or businesses.
In some respects, the Romanian law establishes a legal regime which is more favourable to workers than the Directive, e.g. by providing narrower exceptions or by not using the possibility afforded by the Directive not to apply certain provisions to certain specific categories of employees or undertakings.
However, the Romanian law defines the transfer as a change in ownership from the hands of the transferor to those of the transferee. The reference to 'ownership' may be regarded as restrictive in relation to the definition in the Directive, since the transfer of an undertaking to another employer would not necessarily also mean a transfer of ownership.
Additional metadata
Cost covered by
None
Involved actors other than national government
Trade union
Other
Involvement (others)
representatives of the employees (where there is no trade union)
Thresholds
Affected employees: No, applicable in all circumstances Company size: No, applicable in all circumstances Additional information: No, applicable in all circumstances
Voiculescu, N. and Neagu, V. (2016), Protecția drepturilor lucrătorilor în dreptul internațional și European [Protection of workers' rights in international and European law], Ed. Universitara, Bucharest
Eurofound (2015), Romania: Staff information and consultation on business transfers, Restructuring legislation database, Dublin,
https://apps.eurofound.europa.eu/legislationdb/staff-information-and-consultation-on-business-transfers/romania
This Eurofound research paper explores key trends in restructuring in recent years, highlighting the companies that announced the largest job losses and job gains in the EU. It builds on an analysis of company announcements recorded in Eurofound’s European Restructuring Monitor (ERM), alongside a new classification of restructuring events involving changes in company location.
Employers increasingly use tools such as email, SMS and messaging apps like WhatsApp or Signal to communicate with employees. While these technologies offer both efficiency and convenience, their use in communicating sensitive information, particularly for notifying employees of dismissal, raises legal concerns. This article explores the legal framework on dismissals across the EU, with a special focus on the use of digital means for communicating employment dismissals. Drawing on examples from various Member States, it examines the legal validity of digital dismissals.
In 2023, thousands of workers in big tech lost their jobs. Meta, Amazon, Google, Apple, Microsoft and Salesforce had been considered to offer good and secure jobs up to this point. Giants of the information and communication technology (ICT) sector, these companies are among the highest paying, with Eurostat data from 2022 indicating that workers in ICT had the second-highest median gross hourly earnings (surpassed only by earnings in the financial sector).[1] These layoffs were a shock, especially as the biggest companies had hired extensively during the COVID-19 pandemic. What happened in the two years after this redundancy wave – was that the end of the cuts or did the companies start expanding again?
In 2024, the automotive sector in the EU came to the fore in public and policy discussions. The focus was on the slowdown in electric vehicle (EV) sales, rising global competition, belated investments in new technologies, and the potential closure of production lines in Europe. A number of European car manufacturers and suppliers announced their intention to make large-scale redundancies and change long-standing collective agreements on job security and wages, while workers raised concerns amid demonstrations and industrial action.