Eurofound's ERM database on restructuring-related legal regulations provides
information on regulations in the Member States of the European Union and Norway
which are explicitly or implicitly linked to anticipating and managing change.
Italy: Staff information and consultation on business transfers
Phase
Law 29 December 1990, no. 428, Provisions for the fulfillment of obligations deriving from Italy’s membership of the European Communities
Native name
Legge 29 dicembre 1990, n. 428, Disposizioni per l’adempimento di obblighi derivanti dall’appartenenza dell’Italia alle Comunità europee
Type
Staff information and consultation on business transfers
Added to database
08 May 2015
Article
47
Description
In the case of a transfer of business or part thereof, in companies staffed with more than 15 workers, the information and consultation procedure contained in article 47 of law no. 428/1990 should be complied with in order to protect workers’ collective interests. The notice of a transfer of business or part thereof shall be provided 25 days before the legal act finalising the transfer becomes effective. It has to mention:
the date or proposed date of the transfer;
the reasons of the planned business transfer;
its legal, economic, and social consequences for the workers; and
possible measures for the benefit of the workers.
The unions are involved insofar as the company has to inform the works councils ('Rappresentanze Sindacali Unitarie', RSU) or company works councils ('Rappresentanze Sindacali Aziendali', RSA) about the transfer of business, as well as the sectorial unions that have signed the collective labour agreement applied by the companies involved in the transfer. In case there are no RSA, the company (or its representative association) is obliged to inform the comparatively more representative sectorial unions.
Within seven days, trade unions can ask for a joint examination with the employers; consultation is considered to be concluded should an agreement not be reached within 10 days.
The law clearly states that an anti-union behaviour is to be found not only if information obligations are breached, but also if the company and the trade union have not carried out the joint assessment procedure.
Commentary
Trade unions note that, in some cases, business transfers could be used as a way to impose worse working conditions or to prepare the ground for collective dismissals of the workers being moved.
Additional metadata
Cost covered by
None
Involved actors other than national government
Trade union
Works council
Involvement (others)
None
Thresholds
Affected employees: No, applicable in all circumstances Company size: 15 Additional information: No, applicable in all circumstances
Carinci, M. (2013), Utilizzazione e acquisizione indiretta del lavoro: Somministrazione e distacco, appalto e subappalto, trasferimento d’azienda e di ramo. Diritto del lavoro e nuove forme di organizzazione dell’impresa, Giappichelli, Torino ,
Zilio Grandi, G. and Biasi, M. (2016), Commentario breve alla riforma 'Jobs Act', CEDAM, Padova
Citation
Eurofound (2015), Italy: Staff information and consultation on business transfers, Restructuring legislation database, Dublin,
https://apps.eurofound.europa.eu/legislationdb/staff-information-and-consultation-on-business-transfers/italy
This Eurofound research paper explores key trends in restructuring in recent years, highlighting the companies that announced the largest job losses and job gains in the EU. It builds on an analysis of company announcements recorded in Eurofound’s European Restructuring Monitor (ERM), alongside a new classification of restructuring events involving changes in company location.
Employers increasingly use tools such as email, SMS and messaging apps like WhatsApp or Signal to communicate with employees. While these technologies offer both efficiency and convenience, their use in communicating sensitive information, particularly for notifying employees of dismissal, raises legal concerns. This article explores the legal framework on dismissals across the EU, with a special focus on the use of digital means for communicating employment dismissals. Drawing on examples from various Member States, it examines the legal validity of digital dismissals.
In 2023, thousands of workers in big tech lost their jobs. Meta, Amazon, Google, Apple, Microsoft and Salesforce had been considered to offer good and secure jobs up to this point. Giants of the information and communication technology (ICT) sector, these companies are among the highest paying, with Eurostat data from 2022 indicating that workers in ICT had the second-highest median gross hourly earnings (surpassed only by earnings in the financial sector).[1] These layoffs were a shock, especially as the biggest companies had hired extensively during the COVID-19 pandemic. What happened in the two years after this redundancy wave – was that the end of the cuts or did the companies start expanding again?
In 2024, the automotive sector in the EU came to the fore in public and policy discussions. The focus was on the slowdown in electric vehicle (EV) sales, rising global competition, belated investments in new technologies, and the potential closure of production lines in Europe. A number of European car manufacturers and suppliers announced their intention to make large-scale redundancies and change long-standing collective agreements on job security and wages, while workers raised concerns amid demonstrations and industrial action.