European Restructuring Monitor (ERM)
Eurofound's ERM database on restructuring-related legal regulations provides information on regulations in the Member States of the European Union and Norway which are explicitly or implicitly linked to anticipating and managing change.
Law n. 297/1982, article 1; Law n. 243/2004, article 1; Law n. 296/2006, article 749, 753, 764, 766; Law no. 124/2017, article 1
In Italy, there is no severance pay or redundancy compensation as such. However, upon termination of the employment relationship, the employee receives the so called TFR (Trattamento di fine rapporto), which is a part of workers' wages whose payment is deferred upon termination of the employment relationship. Hence, it cannot be considered a proper severance pay, since it is constituted by a certain amount of salary set aside each month. The TFR is calculated according to the formula of a year's overall salary divided by 13.5, plus 1.5% for each year of service plus compensation for inflation.
The TFR must be paid to the worker in any case of termination of the employment relationship (and therefore independently of the reasons that determined it), except in the case of its full allocation to supplementary pension funds. The law provides for some specific hypotheses in which part of the TFR, which is usually set aside, to be anticipated during the employment relationship. Since 2004 (Legge 243/2004) the TFR can be used to finance complementary pension schemes and be destined to a complementary pension fund. This pension complements the ‘public-law’ pension guaranteed by the compulsory social security system. This means that the worker can actually choose whether to receive the TFR upon termination of the employment relationship, or to pay the sums accrued into a Complementary Pension Fund, which will then provide the worker with a complementary pension.
Starting from 1 January 2007, the TFR has assumed the prevailing purpose of financing complementary pension schemes. There is now an obligation for workers to decide within six months after their hiring the destination of the TFR, i.e. whether to allocate it to a supplementary pension fund or to maintain it in the company. If the worker does not express a preference, the TFR is automatically destined into the supplementary pension fund. This decision is irrevocable.
Law 296/2006 also states that the TFR that the workers of companies with at least 50 employees decide to keep within the company and not to allocate to complementary pension schemes is managed by a special fund set up at INPS (Fund for the provision of the TFR to the employees of the private sector, known as Fondo di Tesoreria, Treasury Fund).
As per changes introduced by Law 4 August 2017, no. 124, workers can also split TFR between the company fund and a pension fund and require an anticipated payment of pension benefits resulting from the payment of TFR into complementary pension funds in case of unemployment for a period exceeding 24 months.
According to law 296/2006, until 31 December 2006, the TFR not destined to complementary pension plans remained in the company until the termination of the employment relationship, except for any anticipation requested by the employee according to the law; thus, the management of the TFR was completely left to the employer.
Eurofound (2015), Italy: Severance pay/redundancy compensation, Restructuring legislation database, Dublin, https://apps.eurofound.europa.eu/legislationdb/severance-payredundancy-compensation/italy
This Eurofound research paper explores key trends in restructuring in recent years, highlighting the companies that announced the largest job losses and job gains in the EU. It builds on an analysis of company announcements recorded in Eurofound’s European Restructuring Monitor (ERM), alongside a new classification of restructuring events involving changes in company location.
:quality(80))
Employers increasingly use tools such as email, SMS and messaging apps like WhatsApp or Signal to communicate with employees. While these technologies offer both efficiency and convenience, their use in communicating sensitive information, particularly for notifying employees of dismissal, raises legal concerns. This article explores the legal framework on dismissals across the EU, with a special focus on the use of digital means for communicating employment dismissals. Drawing on examples from various Member States, it examines the legal validity of digital dismissals.
:quality(80))
In 2023, thousands of workers in big tech lost their jobs. Meta, Amazon, Google, Apple, Microsoft and Salesforce had been considered to offer good and secure jobs up to this point. Giants of the information and communication technology (ICT) sector, these companies are among the highest paying, with Eurostat data from 2022 indicating that workers in ICT had the second-highest median gross hourly earnings (surpassed only by earnings in the financial sector).[1] These layoffs were a shock, especially as the biggest companies had hired extensively during the COVID-19 pandemic. What happened in the two years after this redundancy wave – was that the end of the cuts or did the companies start expanding again?
:quality(80))
In 2024, the automotive sector in the EU came to the fore in public and policy discussions. The focus was on the slowdown in electric vehicle (EV) sales, rising global competition, belated investments in new technologies, and the potential closure of production lines in Europe. A number of European car manufacturers and suppliers announced their intention to make large-scale redundancies and change long-standing collective agreements on job security and wages, while workers raised concerns amid demonstrations and industrial action.
:quality(80))