Eurofound's ERM database on restructuring-related legal regulations provides
information on regulations in the Member States of the European Union and Norway
which are explicitly or implicitly linked to anticipating and managing change.
Norway: Selection of employees for (collective) dismissals
Phase
Working Environment Act
Native name
Arbeidsmiljøloven
Type
Selection of employees for (collective) dismissals
Added to database
08 May 2015
Article
15-7
Description
Employees may not be dismissed unless this is objectively justified based on circumstances relating to the undertaking, the employer or the employee. Dismissal due to curtailed operations or rationalisation measures is not objectively justified if the employer has other suitable work in the undertaking to offer the employee.
The obligation to look for other suitable work was expanded 1 January 2024. If the undertaking is part of a group of company, the employer also must look for suitable work in the other undertakings in the group. A legal definition of "group of companies" is given in section 8-4 (4). Decisive is whether the parent company has decisive influence on the undertaking.
An objective assessment is required when choosing which employees are to be made redundant in case of dismissals of one or more employees according to case law based on the Working Environment Act.The choice of employees is based on a number of factors and different factors carry different levels of importance, depending on the particular aspects of each case, each company’s needs and the market situation. Factors laid down by an agreement between the management and shop steward would normally be seen to be relevant, but courts can rule that other factors should prevail. Relevant factors may include length of service (seniority), qualifications, suitability, disadvantages of being made redundant for the employee and any relevant social factors such as obligations to support family members.
For companies bound by collective agreements, seniority will usually be the dominant principle, but other factors can be included if they are considered to be just. Shop stewards also have a special protection based in Basic Agreements (collective agreements at the cross-sectoral level) stating that the position should be taken into consideration when deciding to dismiss this person.
Commentary
In addition, rules regarding which employees are to be made redundant may be contained in collective agreements. For example, pursuant to the collective agreement between the NHO (Confederation of Norwegian Business and Industry) and the LO (the Norwegian Federation of Trade Unions), length of service is the main criterion in relation to redundancies involving unionised employees. However, the length of service criterion can be deviated from if the reason is objectively justified.
Additional metadata
Cost covered by
None
Involved actors other than national government
Works council
Court
Involvement (others)
None
Thresholds
Affected employees: No, applicable in all circumstances Company size: No, applicable in all circumstances Additional information: No, applicable in all circumstances
This Eurofound research paper explores key trends in restructuring in recent years, highlighting the companies that announced the largest job losses and job gains in the EU. It builds on an analysis of company announcements recorded in Eurofound’s European Restructuring Monitor (ERM), alongside a new classification of restructuring events involving changes in company location.
Employers increasingly use tools such as email, SMS and messaging apps like WhatsApp or Signal to communicate with employees. While these technologies offer both efficiency and convenience, their use in communicating sensitive information, particularly for notifying employees of dismissal, raises legal concerns. This article explores the legal framework on dismissals across the EU, with a special focus on the use of digital means for communicating employment dismissals. Drawing on examples from various Member States, it examines the legal validity of digital dismissals.
In 2023, thousands of workers in big tech lost their jobs. Meta, Amazon, Google, Apple, Microsoft and Salesforce had been considered to offer good and secure jobs up to this point. Giants of the information and communication technology (ICT) sector, these companies are among the highest paying, with Eurostat data from 2022 indicating that workers in ICT had the second-highest median gross hourly earnings (surpassed only by earnings in the financial sector).[1] These layoffs were a shock, especially as the biggest companies had hired extensively during the COVID-19 pandemic. What happened in the two years after this redundancy wave – was that the end of the cuts or did the companies start expanding again?
In 2024, the automotive sector in the EU came to the fore in public and policy discussions. The focus was on the slowdown in electric vehicle (EV) sales, rising global competition, belated investments in new technologies, and the potential closure of production lines in Europe. A number of European car manufacturers and suppliers announced their intention to make large-scale redundancies and change long-standing collective agreements on job security and wages, while workers raised concerns amid demonstrations and industrial action.