Eurofound's ERM database on restructuring-related legal regulations provides
information on regulations in the Member States of the European Union and Norway
which are explicitly or implicitly linked to anticipating and managing change.
Luxembourg: Selection of employees for (collective) dismissals
Phase
Labour Code
Native name
Code du travail
Type
Selection of employees for (collective) dismissals
Added to database
17 December 2015
Article
Art.L. 166-2 to Art. L.166-9
Description
The Labour Code does not provide any criteria regarding the selection of employees as part of a collective dismissal. However, in companies with a joint committee (comité mixte), the employer must reach an agreement with staff representatives with regards to the selection of employees to be dismissed.
In the framework of the law of 23 July 2015 reforming employee representation in companies (Loi du 23 juillet 2015 portant réforme du dialogue social à l'intérieur des entreprises) (EurWork, Luxembourg: Reform of employee representation in companies, 15 December 2015) it should be noted that joint committees will cease to exist after work place elections which take place after 1 January 2016 (and at the latest after the work place election scheduled of 2019). As from these elections, the tasks and duties assigned to joint committees will be transferred to the staff delegations in companies which had at least 150 staff during the 12 months preceding the first day of the posting of the announcement of elections. Until these elections, the joint committees currently in place will continue to carry out their tasks.
Information on the number and categories of employees concerned
In cases of dismissal of at least 7 employees within 30 days or at least 15 employees within 90 days, the employer has to inform and consult the employees’ representatives including the staff committee (délégation du personnel) or the joint committee (comité mixte) on its redundancy project.
Employers must provide written information including the reasons for the projected collective redundancies, the number and categories of employees concerned, the criteria selected to lay off employees and any compensation packages proposed. Then, the employer must negotiate a social plan with the employees’ representatives and representative unions if the employer is bound to a collective agreement. In this framework, social partners may agree on the criteria of selection.
Co-determination if a joint committee exists
In companies with a joint committee (in organisations with at least 150 employees), the employer must reach an agreement regarding the selection of employees with staff representatives. According to the Labour Code, the joint committee exerts an executive power whereby it can co-determinate or provide modifications to the criteria of selection for hiring, promotion, transfer, dismissal and, when applicable, the priority criteria for admission to early retirement of employees. With a view to fulfil this regulation, a consultation process has to take place between the employer and employees' representatives in order to establish the selection criteria.
Commentary
Case law argues that the employer is responsible for his/her business and thus free to decide on restructuring measures leading to job cuts, as long as these actions are not a result of a culpably thoughtless manner and he/she is not using restructuring merely as a pretext for firing staff. Consequently, the employer is not required to justify why he/she has chosen to dismiss an employee rather than another. However, although he/she is free to take this decision, any selection of employees must not be discriminatory.
Additional metadata
Cost covered by
None
Involved actors other than national government
Public employment service
Works council
Involvement (others)
None
Thresholds
Affected employees: 7 Company size: 7 Additional information: There are two company eligibility thresholds: In cases of dismissal of at least 7 employees within 30 days or at least 15 employees within 90 days.
This Eurofound research paper explores key trends in restructuring in recent years, highlighting the companies that announced the largest job losses and job gains in the EU. It builds on an analysis of company announcements recorded in Eurofound’s European Restructuring Monitor (ERM), alongside a new classification of restructuring events involving changes in company location.
Employers increasingly use tools such as email, SMS and messaging apps like WhatsApp or Signal to communicate with employees. While these technologies offer both efficiency and convenience, their use in communicating sensitive information, particularly for notifying employees of dismissal, raises legal concerns. This article explores the legal framework on dismissals across the EU, with a special focus on the use of digital means for communicating employment dismissals. Drawing on examples from various Member States, it examines the legal validity of digital dismissals.
In 2023, thousands of workers in big tech lost their jobs. Meta, Amazon, Google, Apple, Microsoft and Salesforce had been considered to offer good and secure jobs up to this point. Giants of the information and communication technology (ICT) sector, these companies are among the highest paying, with Eurostat data from 2022 indicating that workers in ICT had the second-highest median gross hourly earnings (surpassed only by earnings in the financial sector).[1] These layoffs were a shock, especially as the biggest companies had hired extensively during the COVID-19 pandemic. What happened in the two years after this redundancy wave – was that the end of the cuts or did the companies start expanding again?
In 2024, the automotive sector in the EU came to the fore in public and policy discussions. The focus was on the slowdown in electric vehicle (EV) sales, rising global competition, belated investments in new technologies, and the potential closure of production lines in Europe. A number of European car manufacturers and suppliers announced their intention to make large-scale redundancies and change long-standing collective agreements on job security and wages, while workers raised concerns amid demonstrations and industrial action.