Eurofound's ERM database on restructuring-related legal regulations provides
information on regulations in the Member States of the European Union and Norway
which are explicitly or implicitly linked to anticipating and managing change.
Latvia: Selection of employees for (collective) dismissals
Phase
Labour law
Native name
Darba likums
Type
Selection of employees for (collective) dismissals
Added to database
08 May 2015
Article
47, 108, 109, 110
Description
In the case of a reduction in the number of employees (individual and collective dismissals), employees selected to continue employment are chosen among those who have higher performance results and higher qualifications. If performance results and qualifications do not substantially differ, the law also details selection criteria for further selection; those kept in employment are workers who:
have worked for the relevant employer for a longer time;
while working for the relevant employer, have suffered an accident or have fallen ill with an occupational disease;
are raising a child up to 14 years of age or a disabled child up to 18 years of age;
who, as parents, is in the care of an adult person with a childhood disability who needs special care;
have two or more dependants;
whose family members do not have a regular income;
are disabled persons or are suffering from radiation sickness;
have participated in the rectification of the consequences of the accident at the Chernobyl Atomic Power Plant;
have less than five years remaining to reach retirement age;
without discontinuing work, are acquiring a professional qualification in an educational institution;
have been granted the status of politically repressed person (special status granted, by special Law, to people who suffered from 'Communist and Nazi totalitarian regimes and the political repression of these regimes against Latvian citizens and residents for their political beliefs or political activity').
None of the above mentioned preferences have priority in comparison with the others.
If the number of employees is being reduced, an employer cannot give a notice of dismissal to a pregnant woman, to a woman within the first year after giving birth or to a woman who is breast feeding during the whole period of breast feeding, but not longer than up to two years of the age of the child.
An employer is forbidden to give notice of termination of employment to an employee who is member of a trade union without prior consent of the relevant trade union (except if the employee was under the influence of alcohol, narcotic or toxic substances when performing work), if an employee who previously performed the relevant work has been reinstated at work, if the employer – legal person or partnership – is being liquidated, and during the probation period.
Commentary
No information available.
Additional metadata
Cost covered by
None
Involved actors other than national government
Trade union
Works council
Involvement (others)
None
Thresholds
Affected employees: No, applicable in all circumstances Company size: No, applicable in all circumstances Additional information: No, applicable in all circumstances
Sources
Karnīte, R., 2011, Evaluation of the operation and effects of information and consultation directives in the EU/EEA countries, Fitness Check, National Report Latvia, European Commision, DG for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion
This Eurofound research paper explores key trends in restructuring in recent years, highlighting the companies that announced the largest job losses and job gains in the EU. It builds on an analysis of company announcements recorded in Eurofound’s European Restructuring Monitor (ERM), alongside a new classification of restructuring events involving changes in company location.
Employers increasingly use tools such as email, SMS and messaging apps like WhatsApp or Signal to communicate with employees. While these technologies offer both efficiency and convenience, their use in communicating sensitive information, particularly for notifying employees of dismissal, raises legal concerns. This article explores the legal framework on dismissals across the EU, with a special focus on the use of digital means for communicating employment dismissals. Drawing on examples from various Member States, it examines the legal validity of digital dismissals.
In 2023, thousands of workers in big tech lost their jobs. Meta, Amazon, Google, Apple, Microsoft and Salesforce had been considered to offer good and secure jobs up to this point. Giants of the information and communication technology (ICT) sector, these companies are among the highest paying, with Eurostat data from 2022 indicating that workers in ICT had the second-highest median gross hourly earnings (surpassed only by earnings in the financial sector).[1] These layoffs were a shock, especially as the biggest companies had hired extensively during the COVID-19 pandemic. What happened in the two years after this redundancy wave – was that the end of the cuts or did the companies start expanding again?
In 2024, the automotive sector in the EU came to the fore in public and policy discussions. The focus was on the slowdown in electric vehicle (EV) sales, rising global competition, belated investments in new technologies, and the potential closure of production lines in Europe. A number of European car manufacturers and suppliers announced their intention to make large-scale redundancies and change long-standing collective agreements on job security and wages, while workers raised concerns amid demonstrations and industrial action.