European Restructuring Monitor (ERM)
Eurofound's ERM database on restructuring-related legal regulations provides information on regulations in the Member States of the European Union and Norway which are explicitly or implicitly linked to anticipating and managing change.
L.1233-5, L. 1233-6, L.1233-7, L.1233-17, R.1233-1, D. 1233-2, L. 1132-1
In case of individual or collective dismissals for economic reasons, the employer needs to consider certain criteria for the selection of employees to be made redundant. If applicable, the employer applies the collective agreement's criteria for the implementation of an Job-saving plan (Plan de sauvegarde de l'emploi).
When no collective agreement applies, the employer has the responsibility to define selection criteria, which need to include the following elements as specified by article L. 1233-5:
The employer may give priority to one criterion as long as all the above are considered and can add other criteria to the list. However, article 1132-1 lays out a general principle of non-discrimination in employment relationships: it follows that the employer cannot use the employee's origin, surname, place of residence, ethnicity, physical appearance, gender, sexual orientation, marital status, pregnancy, age, health status, disability, trade union membership, religious and political beliefs as selection criteria for dismissal.
According to article 1233-5, employers have a high degree of flexibility with respect to the application of selection criteria to the business units. Regardless of the workforce size and the dismissal figures, each employer (a single company, including its different business units, where appropriate) is entitled to set the scope of application of selection criteria by collective agreements. In this framework, it is possible to apply the selection criteria to a narrower scope than the entire company. In case no collective agreement is concluded in this respect, it is up to the employer to define the scope of application. In this case, the law limits the scope to at least the individual employment zone (zones d’emploi), in which one or more establishments of the company are located and affected by dismissal. It follows that criteria may vary between employment zones, which are set by the National Institute of Statistics and Economic Studies (INSEE) and the statistics services of the Ministry of Labour. According to the database managed by INSEE, an employment area is a geographic area in which the majority of the general workforce lives and works, and in which establishments can find the bulk of the workforce needed to fill the jobs offered.
Within 10 days after the termination of the contract, the redundant employee may ask the employer which criteria were applied in the dismissal. The employee needs to send a written letter delivered personally against discharge or by registered letter with acknowledgment of receipt (LRAR). The employer must reply to the employee, under the same modalities, within 10 days of the delivery of the letter.
Non-compliance with the selection criteria might lead to the employee receiving compensation.
After the 2015 reform, the labour code was again amended in 2017 to increase the flexibility provided to employers to apply selection criteria. With the 2015 reform, only companies with at least 50 employees and 10 redundant people over a 30-days period could limit the scope of selection criteria through collective agreement. With the 2017 reform, all companies benefit from this provision regardless of their workforce size and dismissal figures.
Case law of the Supreme Court (Cour de cassation) – for collective dismissals of fewer than 10 employees – and the Council of State (Conseil d'Etat) – for collective dismissals of 10 employees and over – strictly controls that all the criteria are taken in consideration. An employer may not directly or indirectly exclude any of these criteria.
Eurofound (2015), France: Selection of employees for (collective) dismissals, Restructuring legislation database, Dublin, https://apps.eurofound.europa.eu/legislationdb/selection-of-employees-for-collective-dismissals/france
This Eurofound research paper explores key trends in restructuring in recent years, highlighting the companies that announced the largest job losses and job gains in the EU. It builds on an analysis of company announcements recorded in Eurofound’s European Restructuring Monitor (ERM), alongside a new classification of restructuring events involving changes in company location.
:quality(80))
Employers increasingly use tools such as email, SMS and messaging apps like WhatsApp or Signal to communicate with employees. While these technologies offer both efficiency and convenience, their use in communicating sensitive information, particularly for notifying employees of dismissal, raises legal concerns. This article explores the legal framework on dismissals across the EU, with a special focus on the use of digital means for communicating employment dismissals. Drawing on examples from various Member States, it examines the legal validity of digital dismissals.
:quality(80))
In 2023, thousands of workers in big tech lost their jobs. Meta, Amazon, Google, Apple, Microsoft and Salesforce had been considered to offer good and secure jobs up to this point. Giants of the information and communication technology (ICT) sector, these companies are among the highest paying, with Eurostat data from 2022 indicating that workers in ICT had the second-highest median gross hourly earnings (surpassed only by earnings in the financial sector).[1] These layoffs were a shock, especially as the biggest companies had hired extensively during the COVID-19 pandemic. What happened in the two years after this redundancy wave – was that the end of the cuts or did the companies start expanding again?
:quality(80))
In 2024, the automotive sector in the EU came to the fore in public and policy discussions. The focus was on the slowdown in electric vehicle (EV) sales, rising global competition, belated investments in new technologies, and the potential closure of production lines in Europe. A number of European car manufacturers and suppliers announced their intention to make large-scale redundancies and change long-standing collective agreements on job security and wages, while workers raised concerns amid demonstrations and industrial action.
:quality(80))