Eurofound's ERM database on restructuring-related legal regulations provides
information on regulations in the Member States of the European Union and Norway
which are explicitly or implicitly linked to anticipating and managing change.
Bulgaria: Selection of employees for (collective) dismissals
Phase
Labour Code; Law for Health and Safety Working Conditions
Native name
Кодекс на труда, Закон за здравословни и безопасни условия на труд
Type
Selection of employees for (collective) dismissals
Added to database
08 May 2015
Article
Article 333 (Labour Code); Article 30 (Law for Health and Safety Working Conditions)
Description
In accordance with provisions of the Labour Code, in the framework of collective dismissals (within 30 days, at least 10 dismissals in companies with 20-99 workers, at least 10% in companies with 100-299 workers, at least 30 dismissals in companies with 300 or more workers) an employer may dismiss only with the prior consent of the labour inspectorate:
employees who are mothers of children younger than three years old;
employees who have been reassigned for health reasons (where the opinion of a commission of medical experts is delivered);
employees suffering from certain diseases listed in a Ministry of Health regulation (certification from commission of health experts necessary);
employees who have commenced a period of authorised leave;
employees who are elected employees' representatives on information and consultation and members of committees on health and safety/working conditions;
members of the European Work Councils.
In cases of the partial closure of an enterprise, as well as of staff cuts or reductions in the volume of the work, the employer is allowed, in the interest of production or business, to dismiss selected employees whose positions have not been made redundant, in order to retain employees of higher qualifications and better performance. However, the employer could dismiss an employee, member of the leadership of the enterprise trade union (territorial, industrial or national elected trade union body) during the period the trade union position is held and no earlier than six months after, only with preliminary agreement of the trade union's central management.
While planning to make such structural changes, the employer must make efforts to reach an agreement with the representatives of the trade unions and that of employees regarding the consequences of possible collective dismissals.
Representatives on working conditions committees and groups are among the protected in case of collective dismissals (Art. 30, Law for Health and Safety Working Conditions.
Commentary
Art. 333 of the Labour Code establishes the so-called 'Prior protection' upon dismissal. The protection is preliminary because it precedes the dismissal. Its purpose is to make dismissal subject to prior authorisation of a state or trade union body, and only upon receipt of that authorisation the dismissal may be carried out. This permission is requested in writing by the employer and must be received in writing by the competent state or trade union body. If such an authorisation is not requested or when been requested, it has not been given before the dismissal, the dismissal made on that ground alone is unlawful.
Additional metadata
Cost covered by
None
Involved actors other than national government
Trade union
Involvement (others)
None
Thresholds
Affected employees: 10 Company size: 20 Additional information: No, applicable in all circumstances
Sources
Kirov, V., 2010, National background paper Bulgaria, Anticipating and managing restructuring in enterprises: 27 national seminars, ARENAS Report, Brussels, European Commission.
This Eurofound research paper explores key trends in restructuring in recent years, highlighting the companies that announced the largest job losses and job gains in the EU. It builds on an analysis of company announcements recorded in Eurofound’s European Restructuring Monitor (ERM), alongside a new classification of restructuring events involving changes in company location.
Employers increasingly use tools such as email, SMS and messaging apps like WhatsApp or Signal to communicate with employees. While these technologies offer both efficiency and convenience, their use in communicating sensitive information, particularly for notifying employees of dismissal, raises legal concerns. This article explores the legal framework on dismissals across the EU, with a special focus on the use of digital means for communicating employment dismissals. Drawing on examples from various Member States, it examines the legal validity of digital dismissals.
In 2023, thousands of workers in big tech lost their jobs. Meta, Amazon, Google, Apple, Microsoft and Salesforce had been considered to offer good and secure jobs up to this point. Giants of the information and communication technology (ICT) sector, these companies are among the highest paying, with Eurostat data from 2022 indicating that workers in ICT had the second-highest median gross hourly earnings (surpassed only by earnings in the financial sector).[1] These layoffs were a shock, especially as the biggest companies had hired extensively during the COVID-19 pandemic. What happened in the two years after this redundancy wave – was that the end of the cuts or did the companies start expanding again?
In 2024, the automotive sector in the EU came to the fore in public and policy discussions. The focus was on the slowdown in electric vehicle (EV) sales, rising global competition, belated investments in new technologies, and the potential closure of production lines in Europe. A number of European car manufacturers and suppliers announced their intention to make large-scale redundancies and change long-standing collective agreements on job security and wages, while workers raised concerns amid demonstrations and industrial action.