Eurofound's ERM database on restructuring-related legal regulations provides
information on regulations in the Member States of the European Union and Norway
which are explicitly or implicitly linked to anticipating and managing change.
Austria: Selection of employees for (collective) dismissals
Phase
Labour Constitution Act (ArbVG); Maternity Leave Act (MSchG); Parental Leave for Fathers Act (VKG); Security of Workplace Act (APSG)
Selection of employees for (collective) dismissals
Added to database
08 May 2015
Article
105 (ArbVG); 10 and 15n (MSchG); 7 (VKG); 12 (APSG)
Description
When selecting employees for (collective) dismissals, the employer has to take into consideration 'social hardship', that is the potential negative consequences for the worker compared to other workers, influenced, for example by the likely duration of unemployment, future lower income levels, the health situation of the worker or the tenure in the current firm.
Certain groups of employees benefit from special protection against dismissal: Apprentices, pregnant women, workers who have recently suffered a miscarriage, parents on parental leave, disabled workers, workers fulfilling their military service, works council members, contract officers in the public service sector and janitors with company housing.
The employer has to inform the works council about each planned dismissal. The works council has one week to comment on the proposal. Upon the request of employees, works council or employee representatives are entitled to appeal to the court within one week after having been notified of a (collective) dismissal and object to it (e.g. in cases were the employer did not inform the works council before dismissals, unfair dismissals on social grounds, membership in trade union etc.). Employees can also challenge the dismissal at court themselves within two weeks after after having been informed, regardless of whether the works council has objected or approved the dismissal (§105 ArbVG).
Commentary
The challenge of a dismissal in cases of 'social hardship' is only possible in companies where at least 5 employees are employed constantly. If the works council has approved dismissals that qualify as socially unjustified it is not possible to appeal to the court (§105 (3), 2).
Additional metadata
Cost covered by
None
Involved actors other than national government
Works council
Involvement (others)
None
Thresholds
Affected employees: No, applicable in all circumstances Company size: 5 Additional information: No, applicable in all circumstances
This Eurofound research paper explores key trends in restructuring in recent years, highlighting the companies that announced the largest job losses and job gains in the EU. It builds on an analysis of company announcements recorded in Eurofound’s European Restructuring Monitor (ERM), alongside a new classification of restructuring events involving changes in company location.
Employers increasingly use tools such as email, SMS and messaging apps like WhatsApp or Signal to communicate with employees. While these technologies offer both efficiency and convenience, their use in communicating sensitive information, particularly for notifying employees of dismissal, raises legal concerns. This article explores the legal framework on dismissals across the EU, with a special focus on the use of digital means for communicating employment dismissals. Drawing on examples from various Member States, it examines the legal validity of digital dismissals.
In 2023, thousands of workers in big tech lost their jobs. Meta, Amazon, Google, Apple, Microsoft and Salesforce had been considered to offer good and secure jobs up to this point. Giants of the information and communication technology (ICT) sector, these companies are among the highest paying, with Eurostat data from 2022 indicating that workers in ICT had the second-highest median gross hourly earnings (surpassed only by earnings in the financial sector).[1] These layoffs were a shock, especially as the biggest companies had hired extensively during the COVID-19 pandemic. What happened in the two years after this redundancy wave – was that the end of the cuts or did the companies start expanding again?
In 2024, the automotive sector in the EU came to the fore in public and policy discussions. The focus was on the slowdown in electric vehicle (EV) sales, rising global competition, belated investments in new technologies, and the potential closure of production lines in Europe. A number of European car manufacturers and suppliers announced their intention to make large-scale redundancies and change long-standing collective agreements on job security and wages, while workers raised concerns amid demonstrations and industrial action.