Eurofound's ERM database on restructuring-related legal regulations provides
information on regulations in the Member States of the European Union and Norway
which are explicitly or implicitly linked to anticipating and managing change.
Austria: Selection of employees for (collective) dismissals
Phase
Labour Constitution Act (ArbVG); Maternity Leave Act (MSchG); Parental Leave for Fathers Act (VKG); Security of Workplace Act (APSG)
Selection of employees for (collective) dismissals
Added to database
08 May 2015
Article
105 (ArbVG); 10 and 15n (MSchG); 7 (VKG); 12 (APSG)
Description
When selecting employees for (collective) dismissals, the employer has to take into consideration 'social hardship', that is the potential negative consequences for the worker compared to other workers, influenced, for example by the likely duration of unemployment, future lower income levels, the health situation of the worker or the tenure in the current firm.
Certain groups of employees benefit from special protection against dismissal: Apprentices, pregnant women, workers who have recently suffered a miscarriage, parents on parental leave, disabled workers, workers fulfilling their military service, works council members, contract officers in the public service sector and janitors with company housing.
The employer has to inform the works council about each planned dismissal. The works council has one week to comment on the proposal. Upon the request of employees, works council or employee representatives are entitled to appeal to the court within one week after having been notified of a (collective) dismissal and object to it (e.g. in cases were the employer did not inform the works council before dismissals, unfair dismissals on social grounds, membership in trade union etc.). Employees can also challenge the dismissal at court themselves within two weeks after after having been informed, regardless of whether the works council has objected or approved the dismissal (§105 ArbVG).
Commentary
The challenge of a dismissal in cases of 'social hardship' is only possible in companies where at least 5 employees are employed constantly. If the works council has approved dismissals that qualify as socially unjustified it is not possible to appeal to the court (§105 (3), 2).
Additional metadata
Cost covered by
None
Involved actors other than national government
Works council
Involvement (others)
None
Thresholds
Affected employees: No, applicable in all circumstances Company size: 5 Additional information: No, applicable in all circumstances
While large-scale redundancies at major manufacturers dominate the headlines, the true impact of this restructuring is being felt most acutely within the wider supply chain. This article examines the uneven distribution of job losses, the growing geographical shifts in production, ...
Eurofound’s ERM restructuring legislation database offers an overview of key restructuring-related regulations in the EU Member States and Norway. Its content is continuously updated to reflect any changes made by national legislators in response to, for instance, policy shifts, legal ...
Can Europe still achieve its ambitions for battery manufacturing? To answer this, the article looks at data from Eurofound’s European Restructuring Monitor and explores what recent large-scale restructuring events reveal about the state of play in the EU battery sector.
This working paper offers a comprehensive methodological overview of the European Restructuring Monitor (ERM) databases. Even though the methodology has not changed over time, new categories have been added, and the way it has been used by researchers and policymakers ...