Eurofound's ERM database on restructuring-related legal regulations provides
information on regulations in the Member States of the European Union and Norway
which are explicitly or implicitly linked to anticipating and managing change.
France: Rescue procedures in insolvency
Phase
Companies' rescues law, Commercial Code
Native name
Sauvegarde des entreprises , Code Du Commerce
Type
Rescue procedures in insolvency
Added to database
02 December 2016
Article
Commercial code, article L611-3 (ad-hoc procedure);
Commercial code, article L611-1 to L611-16 (procédure de conciliation);
Commercial code, articles L628-1 à L628-8 (procédure de sauvegarde accélérée);
Commercial code, articles L620-1 to L627-4 (procédure de sauvegarde);
Commercial code, articles L631-1 to L631-22 (redressement judiciaire).
Description
There are 4 possible paths that can be followed if a company is in financial difficulty: mandat ad-hoc, sauvegarde, conciliation and redressement judiciaire. The choice depends on the financial situation the company is facing.
Procedure de mandat ad-hoc (ad-hoc procedure): This is open to companies where there are some financial difficulties but still fully operational. The court appoints a legal representative who assists the company's CEO but does not take its place. The procedure can be stopped at any moment if the company thinks the procedure reached its goal.
Safeguard procedures (procédure de sauvegarde): This is open to companies approaching a situation where they will have to stop payments. The safeguard procedure can be triggered by the CEO upon reaching the first serious set of difficulties. Unlike conciliation, it is a real judicial procedure that is publicised: the opening judgement is mentioned in the commercial register or in the trades directory and published in the Official Bulletin of Civil and Commercial Announcements (Bodacc) and in a legal notice journal. It lasts 6 months at the maximum. Once there is a plan in place, the tribunal can stop the safeguard procedure and ask the company to enact the plan. The plan might entail the closure or sale of certain activities. The duration of the plan cannot exceed a 10 years' timeline. Moreover, if the company has more than 150 workers and/or a total turnover of more than €20 million, creditors are represented by two committees: one which represents the credit institutes and one that represents the suppliers.
Conciliation: If a company is in a situation where payments have stopped for less than 45 days, the tribunal can start a conciliation procedure upon request of the CEO. The company has to present a full report on its credits and debts, its securities and obligations, its annual reports for the past 3 years, a presentation of the financial situation highlighting difficulties and financial support needs. The company must also present a document containing reflections and an initial assessment on the situation and a way forward to improve the situation. The conciliation procedure aims at reaching a friendly agreement between the company and its creditors. The tribunal can proceed with a 'simple order' to stamp the agreement and its details are kept confidential by the parties. Otherwise an 'approval' procedure can be enacted by the tribunal and in this case the case is made public (with the aim of offering more guaranties to the creditors).Judicial reorganisation proceeding (redressement judiciaire): this is the final step that can be taken to rescue a company. It includes cases where the criteria for the previous steps are not applicable and the company has stopped its payments for longer than 45 days. Under the law, the call for a 'redressement judiciare' can be done by the company or by a creditor. In this case the tribunal announces the opening of reorganisation and liquidation. Then, the CEO is assisted by a legal representative whose mandate is to make sure that creditors' demands are satisfied. The court may also appoint a judicial administrator (required if the company has more than 20 employees and more than €3 million of revenues), whose mission is to assist the CEO for some or all acts of management. The procedure can last for a maximum of 18 months after which there are two possible solutions: repay the debts and implement a continuation of activities plan; or, if debt cannot be repaid, an external buyer can be sought or liquidation of assets can be implemented.
Affected employees: No, applicable in all circumstances Company size: No, applicable in all circumstances Additional information: No, applicable in all circumstances
This Eurofound research paper explores key trends in restructuring in recent years, highlighting the companies that announced the largest job losses and job gains in the EU. It builds on an analysis of company announcements recorded in Eurofound’s European Restructuring Monitor (ERM), alongside a new classification of restructuring events involving changes in company location.
Employers increasingly use tools such as email, SMS and messaging apps like WhatsApp or Signal to communicate with employees. While these technologies offer both efficiency and convenience, their use in communicating sensitive information, particularly for notifying employees of dismissal, raises legal concerns. This article explores the legal framework on dismissals across the EU, with a special focus on the use of digital means for communicating employment dismissals. Drawing on examples from various Member States, it examines the legal validity of digital dismissals.
In 2023, thousands of workers in big tech lost their jobs. Meta, Amazon, Google, Apple, Microsoft and Salesforce had been considered to offer good and secure jobs up to this point. Giants of the information and communication technology (ICT) sector, these companies are among the highest paying, with Eurostat data from 2022 indicating that workers in ICT had the second-highest median gross hourly earnings (surpassed only by earnings in the financial sector).[1] These layoffs were a shock, especially as the biggest companies had hired extensively during the COVID-19 pandemic. What happened in the two years after this redundancy wave – was that the end of the cuts or did the companies start expanding again?
In 2024, the automotive sector in the EU came to the fore in public and policy discussions. The focus was on the slowdown in electric vehicle (EV) sales, rising global competition, belated investments in new technologies, and the potential closure of production lines in Europe. A number of European car manufacturers and suppliers announced their intention to make large-scale redundancies and change long-standing collective agreements on job security and wages, while workers raised concerns amid demonstrations and industrial action.