Eurofound's ERM database on restructuring-related legal regulations provides
information on regulations in the Member States of the European Union and Norway
which are explicitly or implicitly linked to anticipating and managing change.
Finland: Rescue procedures in insolvency
Phase
Bankruptcy act (120/2004); Restructuring of enterprises act (47/1993); Act on the adjustment of the debts of a private individual (57/1993)
Native name
Konkurssilaki (120/2004); Laki yrityksen saneerauksesta (47/1993); Laki yksityishenkilön velkajärjestelystä (57/1993)
Type
Rescue procedures in insolvency
Added to database
06 December 2016
Article
Whole regulations (Bankruptcy act (120/2004); Restructuring of enterprises act (47/1993); Act on the adjustment of the debts of a private individual (57/1993))
Description
The Finnish judicial system recognises three types of insolvency. These are bankruptcy (konkurssi), reorganisation of an undertaking (yrityssaneeraus), and adjustment of the debts of a private individual (yksityishenkilön velkajärjestely). For companies and other legal entities attempting to avoid bankruptcy, the proceeding known as reorganisation is the only option, as the adjustment of debts proceeding is reserved for natural persons.
The general requirement for being able to apply for reorganisation proceedings is not for the debtor to be insolvent but threatened with insolvency (maksukyvytön). Reorganisation can also be initiated through a joint application submitted by the debtor and two creditors, who together have a claim on a minimum of 20% of the debtor's debts.
Reorganisation is generally available to any kind of company, except for certain companies subject to stricter regulation, such as financial institutions. Both the debtor and the creditor have the authority to apply for the commencement of the proceedings. If it is clear that a reorganisation will not be enough to save the company, or if it is considered that the debtor will not be able to cover the costs resulting from the proceedings, the application for reorganisation can be rejected.
A liquidator is appointed by the court to supervise the debtor's business operations and compose a proposal for the planned reorganisation, which is then approved by the court. The debtor has the right to make suggestions about the reorganisation programme. The court can also appoint a committee of creditors to assist the liquidator, which also have a right to comment on the programme. However, the committee of creditors is only appointed if there is an explicit need for one. If the company regularly employs 50 people or more, the employment authorities may appoint a representative as a non-voting member to the committee of creditors.
The liquidator's remuneration is paid by the company (employer) being reorganised. The company is also responsible for any costs incurred during the reorganisation. Members of the committee of creditors are remunerated by the creditors in question, unless otherwise agreed.
The reorganisation programme can cover things such as the adjustment of debts and a transfer of the undertaking, as well as changes to staff arrangements, management, and operational activities. There is no set expiry date for a reorganisation programme: the programme is in effect until the obligations have been met. The debtor is freed from paying any debts that exceed the amount specified in the programme if he/she fulfils his/her obligations. If the debtor significantly fails to comply with the programme, or if the debtor is declared bankrupt, the reorganisation proceedings are terminated.
Commentary
Statistics Finland provides official data on bankruptcies and business restructurings.
According to an expert estimate, companies generally seek reorganisation too late, submit inadequate applications, and expect too much from the procedure. Approximately one-third of the applications are approved by the court, and only around half of the approved companies succeed in the reorganisation.
Additional metadata
Cost covered by
Employer
Involved actors other than national government
Other
Court
Involvement (others)
Creditors
Thresholds
Affected employees: No, applicable in all circumstances Company size: No, applicable in all circumstances Additional information: No, applicable in all circumstances
This Eurofound research paper explores key trends in restructuring in recent years, highlighting the companies that announced the largest job losses and job gains in the EU. It builds on an analysis of company announcements recorded in Eurofound’s European Restructuring Monitor (ERM), alongside a new classification of restructuring events involving changes in company location.
Employers increasingly use tools such as email, SMS and messaging apps like WhatsApp or Signal to communicate with employees. While these technologies offer both efficiency and convenience, their use in communicating sensitive information, particularly for notifying employees of dismissal, raises legal concerns. This article explores the legal framework on dismissals across the EU, with a special focus on the use of digital means for communicating employment dismissals. Drawing on examples from various Member States, it examines the legal validity of digital dismissals.
In 2023, thousands of workers in big tech lost their jobs. Meta, Amazon, Google, Apple, Microsoft and Salesforce had been considered to offer good and secure jobs up to this point. Giants of the information and communication technology (ICT) sector, these companies are among the highest paying, with Eurostat data from 2022 indicating that workers in ICT had the second-highest median gross hourly earnings (surpassed only by earnings in the financial sector).[1] These layoffs were a shock, especially as the biggest companies had hired extensively during the COVID-19 pandemic. What happened in the two years after this redundancy wave – was that the end of the cuts or did the companies start expanding again?
In 2024, the automotive sector in the EU came to the fore in public and policy discussions. The focus was on the slowdown in electric vehicle (EV) sales, rising global competition, belated investments in new technologies, and the potential closure of production lines in Europe. A number of European car manufacturers and suppliers announced their intention to make large-scale redundancies and change long-standing collective agreements on job security and wages, while workers raised concerns amid demonstrations and industrial action.