Eurofound's ERM database on restructuring-related legal regulations provides
information on regulations in the Member States of the European Union and Norway
which are explicitly or implicitly linked to anticipating and managing change.
Cyprus: Rescue procedures in insolvency
Phase
Companies Law (Chapter 113); The Department of Insolvency and Related Matters Law of 2020 (68(I)/2020)
Native name
Ο περι εταιρειών νόμος (κεφάλαιο 113); Ο περί του Τμήματος Αφερεγγυότητας και Συναφών Θεμάτων Νόμος του 2020 (68(I)/2020)
Type
Rescue procedures in insolvency
Added to database
06 December 2016
Article
Companies Law (Chapter 113): Article 202A-202LH; Article 97, Articles 222-225
The Department of Insolvency and Related Matters Law of 2020 (68(I)/2020): Article 7
The Department of the Registrar of Companies and Intellectual Property Law of 2021 (133(I)/2021): Article 3
Description
An examinership procedure was introduced in 2015 with an amendment to Cyprus' Companies Law (Chapter 113). The Law 62(I)/2015 amending the Companies Law is adding Part IVA 'Appointment of Examiner'.
The examinership procedure allows a company risking insolvency, or a creditor or a contingent or a prospective creditor (including an employee) of that company, to apply for examinership. The application must be accompanied by a rescue plan.
An examinership procedure envisages the appointment of an examiner (an expert in insolvency), under the court's supervision, who is in charge of evaluating the rescue plan. If the rescue plan is considered viable the court allows for the start of rescue operations. For the plan to take effect, the creditors' committee must agree with the plan, too.
During examinership, which can last up to six months (including extension), the assets of the company are protected from the enforcement of individual claims. The examinership ends by order of the court when insolvency problems are resolved or when no rescue operation is deemed possible by the examiner. In the latter case the court may order the company to be wound up.
Another rescue procedure is receivership (Companies Law, article 97 and 222-225), which allows for a creditor to claim their due but also allows for the continuation of the operations of the company. The court decides to appoint a receiver when it deems necessary to protect the creditor's claims. The receivership procedure puts the company's operation in the hands of the receiver who can decide how to recover the amount of the claim by selling, in whole or in part, the company's assets. The receivership procedure ends when the debtor's claim is satisfied. The receivership procedure should allow a company to return to its regular business operations once the debt is paid.
On the 1st of January 2020, the Department of Insolvency began its operation, based on the new relevant legislation. The management of the affairs of the Official Receiver and the Insolvency Service (as described in the aforementioned Companies Law) were transferred to the Department of Insolvency (as a result, in 2021 the Department of the Registrar of Companies and Official Receiver was renamed into the Department of the Registrar of Companies and Intellectual Property).
According to the Insolvency Legal and Regulatory Framework, among the main purposes of the Department and its procedures is to formulate and cultivate a culture of survival and second chances (as opposed to bankruptcy and liquidation), to aid with the rescue and restoration of business activity and the reconstruction and preservation of viable businesses through the establishment of a corporate debt restructuring mechanism, and to safeguard the viability of natural and legal persons, through the provision of appropriate tools and framework for restructuring their loans.
Commentary
Examinership has many advantages to companies at risk of insolvency, as it provides them with some time in order to formulate a rescue plan.
Despite article 202IZ, which provided for the examiner to submit a notification on their appointment (formerly to the Department of the Registrar of Companies and Official Receiver, and presently to the Department of Insolvency) and the latter to publish such information on its websites, no such information was systematically administered and published from 2015 until now (2023), including statistics over outcomes of examinership procedures. Thorough inquiring and the interviewing of officers of the Department of Insolvency, revealed that the reason behind this is simply that there are actually zero cases of companies that proceeded with the rescue procedures. Throughout the years there was a number of companies that initiated communication with the Department of the Registrar (and later with the Department of Insolvency) regarding the rescue procedures, and even proceeded with submitting applications; however they did not follow through, withdrew their applications and opted with settling their debts extrajudicially.
Additional metadata
Cost covered by
None
Involved actors other than national government
Other
Court
Involvement (others)
Creditors
Thresholds
Affected employees: No, applicable in all circumstances Company size: No, applicable in all circumstances Additional information: No, applicable in all circumstances
This Eurofound research paper explores key trends in restructuring in recent years, highlighting the companies that announced the largest job losses and job gains in the EU. It builds on an analysis of company announcements recorded in Eurofound’s European Restructuring Monitor (ERM), alongside a new classification of restructuring events involving changes in company location.
Employers increasingly use tools such as email, SMS and messaging apps like WhatsApp or Signal to communicate with employees. While these technologies offer both efficiency and convenience, their use in communicating sensitive information, particularly for notifying employees of dismissal, raises legal concerns. This article explores the legal framework on dismissals across the EU, with a special focus on the use of digital means for communicating employment dismissals. Drawing on examples from various Member States, it examines the legal validity of digital dismissals.
In 2023, thousands of workers in big tech lost their jobs. Meta, Amazon, Google, Apple, Microsoft and Salesforce had been considered to offer good and secure jobs up to this point. Giants of the information and communication technology (ICT) sector, these companies are among the highest paying, with Eurostat data from 2022 indicating that workers in ICT had the second-highest median gross hourly earnings (surpassed only by earnings in the financial sector).[1] These layoffs were a shock, especially as the biggest companies had hired extensively during the COVID-19 pandemic. What happened in the two years after this redundancy wave – was that the end of the cuts or did the companies start expanding again?
In 2024, the automotive sector in the EU came to the fore in public and policy discussions. The focus was on the slowdown in electric vehicle (EV) sales, rising global competition, belated investments in new technologies, and the potential closure of production lines in Europe. A number of European car manufacturers and suppliers announced their intention to make large-scale redundancies and change long-standing collective agreements on job security and wages, while workers raised concerns amid demonstrations and industrial action.