Eurofound's ERM database on restructuring-related legal regulations provides
information on regulations in the Member States of the European Union and Norway
which are explicitly or implicitly linked to anticipating and managing change.
Belgium: Rescue procedures in insolvency
Phase
Book XX of the economic code 'Insolvency of Enterprises' of 11 August 2017; Act of 27 May 2013 to modify different laws with regards to the continuity of companies
Native name
Wet houdende invoeging van het Boek XX van economisch recht 'Insolventie van ondernemingen' 11 August 2017/Loi portant insertion du Livre XX dans le Code de droit économique 'Insolvabilité des entreprises', 11 August 2017; Loi relative à la continuité des entreprises; Wet van 27 mei 2013 - Wet tot wijziging van verschillende wetgevingen inzake de continuïteit van de ondernemingen/Loi de 27 Mai 2013 - Loi modifiant diverses législations en matière de continuité des entreprises
Type
Rescue procedures in insolvency
Added to database
28 September 2016
Article
Whole law
De Wet van 7 juni 2023 tot omzetting van Richtlijn (EU) 2019/1023 van het Europees Parlement en de Raad van 20 juni 2019 betreffende preventieve herstructureringsstelsels, betreffende kwijtschelding van schuld en beroepsverboden, en betreffende maatregelen ter verhoging van de efficiëntie van procedures inzake herstructurering, insolventie en kwijtschelding van schuld, en tot wijziging van Richtlijn(EU) 2017/1132 en houdende diverse bepalingen inzake insolvabiliteit.
Description
Book XX of the Economic Law Code, entered into force on 1 May 2018, replaced the Act of 8 August 1997 on Bankruptcies and the Act of 31 January 2009 on the Continuity of Undertakings. The scope of application of Book XX of the Economic Law Code has been extended to include all enterprises, the debtor being defined as:
any individual who independently exercises a professional activity;
any legal entity;
any organisation without legal personality.
With these changes independent liberal professionals, farmers, not for profit organisations, foundations, and trusts, are included in the scope of the law. The law does not apply in cases where the legal person has a public law entity status or is a natural person.
The 'insolvency of enterprises law' also recognises the role of the 'chambers for companies facing economic difficulties' (chambres des entreprises en difficulté) which are in charge of monitoring the 'health' of the companies. They check whether companies:
have not paid their bills;
have not paid their social security contributions, VAT or have been withholding tax for two quarters;
have not pay their contributions to the National Institute of Social Insurance for Self-Employed for a quarter;
have any ongoing trial for non payment of debt;
have received notices mentioning seizing of assets;
has been subjected to the opening of insolvency proceedings in another Member State, this fact must now be communicated (article XX.202 CDE)
The aim of the chambers is threefold:
Track businesses in difficulty;
Enable them to become aware of the situation;
Encourage them to react appropriately to ensure their recovery and their safeguarding.
The chamber can examine at-risk cases and, if deemed necessary, a representative of the company is called upon by the chamber to discuss the situation of the company. The discussions are confidential. If the company is deemed in difficulties, the company can file for reorganisation.
The law (Title III of book XX) allows a company in temporary difficulties to undertake certain restructuring measures under the supervision of the judicial authority in order to avoid bankruptcy. There are three main options for restructuring, characterised by their different degree of voluntarism (low involvement of courts) and impact on the business. From the most voluntary and least impactful to the most, the three main options for restructuring are:
An out-of-court agreement (article XX.38 CDE) with all or at least two creditors, chosen by the debtor, with a view to restructuring the debtor's liabilities. The out of court agreement is protected by confidentiality and indivisibility of the company;
The conclusion of a reorganisation plan, which must be approved by both the creditors and the national court; in this cases the CEO is replaced by an administrator appointed by the court;
The sale of the business (or part thereof) as a going concern. This option is always overseen by the courts. If the application for insolvency has been filed less than two months before the agreed sale of assets seized to repay debt, the sales of assets should proceed unless the court decides otherwise. This is to avoid wasted costs of a sale where the filing of a petition is merely a procedural tactic to delay the process.
Another important feature introduced by book XX art. 2 paragraph 6, is the establishment of an online register where all the documents of the insolvency are kept; all communication is also via digital media (email) and has legal value.
On 25 May 2023, the House of Representatives adopted the draft law transposing Directive (EU) 2019/1023 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2019 on preventive restructuring schemes, on debt write-offs and prohibitions on appeals, and on measures to increase the efficiency of restructuring, insolvency and debt cancellation procedures, and amending Directive (EU) 2017/1132 and containing various provisions on insolvency.
This law takes another step towards a more modern insolvency law and companies are given additional opportunities to restructure themselves in order to preserve the economic fabric.
Its main objectives are:
To give a company in financial difficulties access to an effective preventive restructuring system that allows it to avoid insolvency.
To give a company natural person a second chance.
Make procedures on restructuring, insolvency and debt cancellation more efficient and shorter.
Achieve further harmonisation of insolvency proceedings in the European Union.
Commentary
Generally speaking, in most of the cases creditors are willing to participate, considering that if they refused to do so, the company would be declared bankrupt and they would lose their money altogether.
Statbel, the Belgian statistical office, publishes data on bankruptcies in Belgium. To access the data, visit Statbel
Additional metadata
Cost covered by
National government
Involved actors other than national government
Other
Court
Involvement (others)
Creditors, administrators, chambers for companies facing economic difficulties.
Thresholds
Affected employees: No, applicable in all circumstances Company size: No, applicable in all circumstances Additional information: No, applicable in all circumstances
This Eurofound research paper explores key trends in restructuring in recent years, highlighting the companies that announced the largest job losses and job gains in the EU. It builds on an analysis of company announcements recorded in Eurofound’s European Restructuring Monitor (ERM), alongside a new classification of restructuring events involving changes in company location.
Employers increasingly use tools such as email, SMS and messaging apps like WhatsApp or Signal to communicate with employees. While these technologies offer both efficiency and convenience, their use in communicating sensitive information, particularly for notifying employees of dismissal, raises legal concerns. This article explores the legal framework on dismissals across the EU, with a special focus on the use of digital means for communicating employment dismissals. Drawing on examples from various Member States, it examines the legal validity of digital dismissals.
In 2023, thousands of workers in big tech lost their jobs. Meta, Amazon, Google, Apple, Microsoft and Salesforce had been considered to offer good and secure jobs up to this point. Giants of the information and communication technology (ICT) sector, these companies are among the highest paying, with Eurostat data from 2022 indicating that workers in ICT had the second-highest median gross hourly earnings (surpassed only by earnings in the financial sector).[1] These layoffs were a shock, especially as the biggest companies had hired extensively during the COVID-19 pandemic. What happened in the two years after this redundancy wave – was that the end of the cuts or did the companies start expanding again?
In 2024, the automotive sector in the EU came to the fore in public and policy discussions. The focus was on the slowdown in electric vehicle (EV) sales, rising global competition, belated investments in new technologies, and the potential closure of production lines in Europe. A number of European car manufacturers and suppliers announced their intention to make large-scale redundancies and change long-standing collective agreements on job security and wages, while workers raised concerns amid demonstrations and industrial action.