European Restructuring Monitor (ERM)
Eurofound's ERM database on restructuring-related legal regulations provides information on regulations in the Member States of the European Union and Norway which are explicitly or implicitly linked to anticipating and managing change.
167, 169, 171
The Insolvency Act distinguishes between 'insolvency/bankruptcy' (Konkursverfahren) and ‘restructuring’ (Sanierungsverfahren) procedures. Whereas the first leads to selling the company to satisfy creditors, the second procedure aims to restructure business operations in order to continue the operations of the insolvent company (Business Service Portal). Companies can file for restructuring procedures in cases of indebtedness, bankruptcy or imminent insolvency.
Similar to insolvency procedures, companies first have to make an insolvency filing. Restructuring procedures require a restructuring plan that needs to be submitted before the opening of the insolvency procedures (§ 167). The restructuring plan needs to be approved by the majority of the creditors (which represent at least half of all due claims) within 90 days after the opening of insolvency procedures. After its approval the case will be continued as restructuring procedure. The debtor must offer the insolvency creditors in the payment plan at least a quota corresponding to his income situation in the following 3 years (instead of the previous 5 years).
The procedure can either be with or without self-administration (§ 169).
Procedure with self-administration: The court appoints a restructuring administrator while the debtor is able to dispose over assets and keeps legal authority. The restructuring administrator examines whether the restructuring plans are feasible and monitors the company's expenditures. Dispositions by the debtor of the insolvency estate shall be effective only if the insolvency court consents thereto. Liabilities incurred by the debtor after the opening of insolvency proceedings shall only be claims of the insolvency estate if the insolvency court agrees. The debtor does not have the right to apply for the liquidation of the insolvency estate in accordance with the law (debt collection or auction via the court). Prerequisites for this procedure are:
Procedure without self-administration: Authority is handed over to a liquidator until the court approves the plans for restructuring. After that, debtors get back full access to company assets. Prerequisites for this procedure are:
If the restructuring plan fails or is withdrawn by the debtor, insolvency procedures and a liquidation of insolvency assets will be initiated.
If new financing or interim financing is provided in the course of restructuring within the meaning of the ReO, such financing or interim financing cannot be challenged if the insolvency was not known (to the opponent of the challenge). This applies to new financing or interim financing that is included in the confirmed restructuring plan or has been approved by the court.
Transactions during a restructuring are not voidable if they were approved by the court and the insolvency was not known (to the opposing party).
The 2010 amendment of the insolvency regulation created a single insolvency proceeding which focused on making reorganisation easier and faster through a number of methods. An important aspect of the amendment was that it made the differentiation in terminology between 'restructuring' and 'insolvency/bankruptcy', thereby reducing the stigma surrounding insolvency procedures and especially 'forced settlement’. It also reduced the minimum required quotas of payable liabilities for entering self-administrated restructuring procedures from 40% to 30% (see 'procedure with self-administration' in the description above). This legislation also increased the incentives to enter proceedings earlier than what was previously legislated for (Government policy paper, XXIV. GP).
In 2021 a "short skimming procedure" with a repayment plan (3 years) - in addition to the "normal skimming procedure" with a skimming plan (5 years) - was added in order to implement the Restructuring and Insolvency Directive (RIRL, Directive (EU) 2019/1023).
Eurofound (2016), Austria: Rescue procedures in insolvency, Restructuring legislation database, Dublin, https://apps.eurofound.europa.eu/legislationdb/rescue-procedures-in-insolvency/austria
This Eurofound research paper explores key trends in restructuring in recent years, highlighting the companies that announced the largest job losses and job gains in the EU. It builds on an analysis of company announcements recorded in Eurofound’s European Restructuring Monitor (ERM), alongside a new classification of restructuring events involving changes in company location.
:quality(80))
Employers increasingly use tools such as email, SMS and messaging apps like WhatsApp or Signal to communicate with employees. While these technologies offer both efficiency and convenience, their use in communicating sensitive information, particularly for notifying employees of dismissal, raises legal concerns. This article explores the legal framework on dismissals across the EU, with a special focus on the use of digital means for communicating employment dismissals. Drawing on examples from various Member States, it examines the legal validity of digital dismissals.
:quality(80))
In 2023, thousands of workers in big tech lost their jobs. Meta, Amazon, Google, Apple, Microsoft and Salesforce had been considered to offer good and secure jobs up to this point. Giants of the information and communication technology (ICT) sector, these companies are among the highest paying, with Eurostat data from 2022 indicating that workers in ICT had the second-highest median gross hourly earnings (surpassed only by earnings in the financial sector).[1] These layoffs were a shock, especially as the biggest companies had hired extensively during the COVID-19 pandemic. What happened in the two years after this redundancy wave – was that the end of the cuts or did the companies start expanding again?
:quality(80))
In 2024, the automotive sector in the EU came to the fore in public and policy discussions. The focus was on the slowdown in electric vehicle (EV) sales, rising global competition, belated investments in new technologies, and the potential closure of production lines in Europe. A number of European car manufacturers and suppliers announced their intention to make large-scale redundancies and change long-standing collective agreements on job security and wages, while workers raised concerns amid demonstrations and industrial action.
:quality(80))