European Restructuring Monitor (ERM)
Eurofound's ERM database on restructuring-related legal regulations provides information on regulations in the Member States of the European Union and Norway which are explicitly or implicitly linked to anticipating and managing change.
Article 127, 128
The employer is obliged to notify the competent public employment service of the consultations related to collective redundancies of at least 20 employees, of whom at least 5 made redundant on grounds of severe business conditions. The notification has to contain the information on the duration of consultations with the works council, outcomes and conclusions resulting therefrom, with a statement of the works council attached thereto. The works council may send any comments and suggestions they may have to the competent public authority responsible for employment and to the employer, with regards to the mentioned notification.
Projected collective redundancies notified to the competent public authority responsible for employment take effect no earlier than 30 days after the mentioned notification. The competent public authority responsible for employment may within a period of 30 days request the employer to postpone either collective or individual redundancies for a maximum 30 days if the employer is able to ensure the continuation of employment during this extended period.
After the works council has submitted its observations, the employer has to consider and illustrate all options and proposals that could prevent the expected redundancies. This is an obligation introduced in 2017 for the employer which was not stipulated in the previous labor act. Thus, the legislator gives the works council a slightly more important role in advising in case of collective redundancy. According to the amended labor act, the employer has no longer the obligation to prepare the redundancy (redeployment) program. However, the law does not stipulate who is responsible for the preparation of redundancy (redeployment) program.
With article 218, the legislator is trying to avoid the inevitable, and by administrative measures to complicate and prolong the cancellation procedure, which will, in most cases, end with the termination of employment of certain workers. De facto, it is about the state buying the extension of the workers' notice period, with no real prospects of ultimately affecting the change in the status of the workers who are covered by this kind of notice. The specific provisions "freeze" the implementation of the redundancy plan in the part that foresees the termination of a certain number of workers, for a period of 30 (thirty) days from the date of delivery of the redundancy plan to the competent public employment service. The phrase from paragraph 1 "(...) the employment relationship must not end (...)" has the legal effect of ending the notice period.
Paragraph 2 of the cited article foresees the possibility for the competent public employment service to order a postponement of the cancellation of all or individual workers for whom a redundancy program has been prepared for a maximum of thirty days, if during the extended period it can ensure the continuation of the worker's employment (Graf, 2023).
Although there is no longer an obligation to notify about the measures taken to dispose of redundant workers, the employer still has to at least mention some of the previously mentioned elements, or as an explanation that he has already disposed of some of the workers on that way (e.g. by retraining) and for some other measures even simply mention that he did not have the opportunity to implement them. If this were not the case, there would be nothing to inform the works council about this type of notification. The employer would certainly have to provide the works council with information about the possibility of employing workers in other jobs, regardless of the fact that this is no longer a requirement for business-related dismissal. Namely, given that the law obliges him to give notice of measures to dispose of redundant workers, he or she should also mention to the works council the issue of employing workers on other jobs. In the case that there are no other jobs, he or she should inform the works council about such circumstances. He or she can also state the reason why workers from the collective surplus cannot be employed on freelance jobs (e.g. lack of qualifications, etc.). Employment in other jobs is certainly the most common and most realistic measure to prevent layoffs, so the employer should definitely take this into account when collective redundancy and informing the works council (Rozman, 2023).
Eurofound (2015), Croatia: Public authorities information and consultation on dismissals, Restructuring legislation database, Dublin, https://apps.eurofound.europa.eu/legislationdb/public-authorities-information-and-consultation-on-dismissals/croatia
Between the end of 2022 and the first half of 2023, almost 300,000 employees working for ‘big tech’ companies were laid off across the world, making headlines for months in global media. This development has been a shock, considering the high numbers of jobs in well-known tech corporations with a reputation for offering good working conditions and well-paid positions.
The retail banking sector is fertile ground for studying the impacts of digitalisation on work and employment. Financial services are increasingly provided online, without the intermediary of customer-facing institutions. Many banks in the sector have been undergoing serial restructuring since the global financial crisis, and it is one of the few service sectors with stagnant or declining employment.
Since 2011, the Restructuring support instruments database of the EU PolicyWatch has been collecting information on measures that assist companies and workers to anticipate and manage restructuring. This article looks at measures in the database aimed at supporting employees and employers during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020–2022).
Eurofound’s European Restructuring Monitor database reveals the impact of the energy crisis on employment in the EU. Following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, energy prices have hit record highs. The European Commission imposed sanctions and limitations on the import of oil and gas from Russia, which has reacted by reneging on supply commitments to many Member States.
