Eurofound's ERM database on restructuring-related legal regulations provides
information on regulations in the Member States of the European Union and Norway
which are explicitly or implicitly linked to anticipating and managing change.
Romania: Obligation to consider alternatives to collective dismissals
Phase
Labour Code, Law no. 53/2003, republished in the Official Gazette of Romania no. 345 of 18 May 2011
Native name
Codul muncii, Legea nr. 53/2003, republicată în Monitorul Oficial nr. 345 din 18 mai 2011
Type
Obligation to consider alternatives to collective dismissals
Added to database
08 May 2015
Article
Article 69, paragraph 1 (a) and (b), and article 71, paragraphs 1 and 2
Description
If an employer contemplates to resort to collective dismissals (i.e. dismissal of at least 10 employees in companies with 21-99 workers, at least 10% of staff in companies with 100-299 workers or at least 30 employees in larger firms), the employer is under the obligation to initiate, in due time, for the purpose of reaching an agreement, consultations with the trade union or the employee representatives, as appropriate, with regard to the methods and the means by which collective redundancies can be avoided, or the number of redundancies can be diminished, the social measures that can be taken to reduce the social effects of the dismissals, such as the employer’s support for the redundant employees’ vocational requalification or retraining.
The trade union or the employee representatives may, within 10 days of the receiving date of the collective dismissal notice, propose to the employer measures to avoid collective dismissals or reduce the number of redundancies.
Within five days of the receiving date of the proposals made as above, the employer must respond in writing, and substantiate the decision.
Commentary
Romanian legislation is in line with Council Directive 98/59/EC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to collective redundancies.
The sanction for non-fulfilment of the obligation to consult the trade union with the purpose of identifying alternatives to the collective redundancy will nullify the decision to dismiss. In jurisprudence and doctrine, there is no unitary view in respect of the trade union having the right to be consulted in order to identify alternative measures for collective redundancies; the question of whether it is only the representative union or any union within the unit that should be consulted remains open. The question is important because in some cases the court has cancelled the decision of collective dismissal ordered without consulting all unions established in the unit, whether representative or not, and indeed, the Labour Code does not refer here to representativeness.
As a result of amendments to the Labour Code, the legal measures concerning collective redundancies are not applicable to employees of public institutions.
Additional metadata
Cost covered by
Employer
Involved actors other than national government
Trade union
Other
Involvement (others)
Workers' representatives, in case there is no trade union
Thresholds
Affected employees: 10 Company size: 21 Additional information: No, applicable in all circumstances
This Eurofound research paper explores key trends in restructuring in recent years, highlighting the companies that announced the largest job losses and job gains in the EU. It builds on an analysis of company announcements recorded in Eurofound’s European Restructuring Monitor (ERM), alongside a new classification of restructuring events involving changes in company location.
Employers increasingly use tools such as email, SMS and messaging apps like WhatsApp or Signal to communicate with employees. While these technologies offer both efficiency and convenience, their use in communicating sensitive information, particularly for notifying employees of dismissal, raises legal concerns. This article explores the legal framework on dismissals across the EU, with a special focus on the use of digital means for communicating employment dismissals. Drawing on examples from various Member States, it examines the legal validity of digital dismissals.
In 2023, thousands of workers in big tech lost their jobs. Meta, Amazon, Google, Apple, Microsoft and Salesforce had been considered to offer good and secure jobs up to this point. Giants of the information and communication technology (ICT) sector, these companies are among the highest paying, with Eurostat data from 2022 indicating that workers in ICT had the second-highest median gross hourly earnings (surpassed only by earnings in the financial sector).[1] These layoffs were a shock, especially as the biggest companies had hired extensively during the COVID-19 pandemic. What happened in the two years after this redundancy wave – was that the end of the cuts or did the companies start expanding again?
In 2024, the automotive sector in the EU came to the fore in public and policy discussions. The focus was on the slowdown in electric vehicle (EV) sales, rising global competition, belated investments in new technologies, and the potential closure of production lines in Europe. A number of European car manufacturers and suppliers announced their intention to make large-scale redundancies and change long-standing collective agreements on job security and wages, while workers raised concerns amid demonstrations and industrial action.