Eurofound's ERM database on restructuring-related legal regulations provides
information on regulations in the Member States of the European Union and Norway
which are explicitly or implicitly linked to anticipating and managing change.
Lithuania: Obligation to consider alternatives to collective dismissals
Phase
Labour code No XII-2603, Law on unemployment social insurance No IX-1904
Native name
Darbo kodeksas Nr. XII-2603, LR nedarbo socialinio draudimo įstatymas Nr. IX-1904
Type
Obligation to consider alternatives to collective dismissals
Added to database
08 May 2015
Article
Labour code (48, 207), Law on unemployment social insurance No IX-1904 (18)
Description
According to the Labour code (article 207), before taking a decision on collective redundancy, the employer must inform and hold consultations with the works council. At least 7 working days before the beginning of the planned consultation, the employer must provide the works council with written information on:
the reasons for the planned dismissal;
the total number of employees and the number of redundancies, by category;
the period during which the employment contracts will be terminated;
the selection criteria for redundancy;
the terms of employment contract termination and other relevant information.
When an enterprise, institution or organisation does not have a works council or an employee trustee implementing the functions thereof, the employer must provide the aforementioned information within the time limits established therein to the employer-level trade union as well as to the employees, either directly or at a general meeting of employees of the employer.
On the basis of the information provided (within five days of receipt of the information), consultations shall be held with the works council with the aim to agree on methods and measures to be used to avoid layoffs or to reduce the number of redundancies and to mitigate the negative consequences for the dismissed employees. Consultations must be aimed at coming to an agreement between the employer and employee representatives. The employer-level trade union must be informed by the works council of the course of consultations and shall be entitled to express its opinion to the works council and the employer. The employer must hold consultations for at least 10 working days from the first day of consultation unless the works council agrees to a different term (article 207).
The Labour code also stipulates (article 48) that when, due to valid economic reasons that objectively exist in a certain territory or sector of economic activity and that are recognised as such by the government, the employer is unable to provide employees with work and the collective dismissal may occur, short-time working may be established by the employer. Short-time working time is shortened by up to 50% of the employee’s standard working hours. In this case, the employee is paid a short-time work benefit in accordance with the procedure established by the Law on unemployment social insurance.
According to the Law on unemployment social insurance, the amount of the short-time work benefit shall be equal to short-time work hours (up to 50% of the working time rate) in proportion to the lower unemployment benefit that would be paid to the person in accordance with Article 8 of the Law on unemployment social insurance. The amount of the unemployment benefit used to calculate the short-time work benefit may not exceed 58.18% of the gross average wage paid in the national economy in the previous quarter. The short-time work benefit can be paid for a maximum period of three months (article 18). The State Social Insurance Fund Board (Sodra) carries out the final decision regarding the employer's request for short-time work benefits.
Commentary
No information available.
Additional metadata
Cost covered by
Companies
Employer
Involved actors other than national government
Trade union
Works council
Other
Involvement (others)
State Social Insurance Fund Board (Sodra)
Thresholds
Affected employees: 20 Company size: 10 Additional information: Dismissal of a group of employees shall be deemed to be the termination of the employment contract at the initiative of the employer, without the fault of the employee (Article 57 of the Labour Code), at the will of the employer (Article 59 of the Labour Code), or by agreement between the parties to the employment contract (Article 54 of the Labour Code), initiated by the employer, within a period of no more than 30 calendar days, or where the employer's bankruptcy (Article 62 of the Labour Code) results in the anticipation of dismissal:
1) 10 or more employees in an establishment with an average number of employees of between 20 and 99;
2) 10 per cent or more of the employees in an establishment with an average number of employees of between 100 and 299;
3) 30 or more employees in a workplace with an average number of employees of 300 or more.
This Eurofound research paper explores key trends in restructuring in recent years, highlighting the companies that announced the largest job losses and job gains in the EU. It builds on an analysis of company announcements recorded in Eurofound’s European Restructuring Monitor (ERM), alongside a new classification of restructuring events involving changes in company location.
Employers increasingly use tools such as email, SMS and messaging apps like WhatsApp or Signal to communicate with employees. While these technologies offer both efficiency and convenience, their use in communicating sensitive information, particularly for notifying employees of dismissal, raises legal concerns. This article explores the legal framework on dismissals across the EU, with a special focus on the use of digital means for communicating employment dismissals. Drawing on examples from various Member States, it examines the legal validity of digital dismissals.
In 2023, thousands of workers in big tech lost their jobs. Meta, Amazon, Google, Apple, Microsoft and Salesforce had been considered to offer good and secure jobs up to this point. Giants of the information and communication technology (ICT) sector, these companies are among the highest paying, with Eurostat data from 2022 indicating that workers in ICT had the second-highest median gross hourly earnings (surpassed only by earnings in the financial sector).[1] These layoffs were a shock, especially as the biggest companies had hired extensively during the COVID-19 pandemic. What happened in the two years after this redundancy wave – was that the end of the cuts or did the companies start expanding again?
In 2024, the automotive sector in the EU came to the fore in public and policy discussions. The focus was on the slowdown in electric vehicle (EV) sales, rising global competition, belated investments in new technologies, and the potential closure of production lines in Europe. A number of European car manufacturers and suppliers announced their intention to make large-scale redundancies and change long-standing collective agreements on job security and wages, while workers raised concerns amid demonstrations and industrial action.