Eurofound's ERM database on restructuring-related legal regulations provides
information on regulations in the Member States of the European Union and Norway
which are explicitly or implicitly linked to anticipating and managing change.
Greece: Obligation to consider alternatives to collective dismissals
Phase
PD 178/2002: Μeasures for safeguarding employees' rights in the event of transfers of undertakings, businesses or parts of businesses, transposing Directive 98/50/EC; Law 3846/2010: Guarantees for job security and other provisions
Native name
ΠΔ 178/2002: Μέτρα προστασίας των εργαζομένων σε περίπτωση μεταβίβασης επιχειρήσεων, εγκαταστάσεων ή τμημάτων εγκαταστάσεων ή επιχειρήσεων, σε συμμόρφωση προς την οδηγία 98/50/ΕΚ του Συμβουλίου; Ν. 3846/2010: Εγγυήσεις για την εργασιακή ασφάλεια και άλλες διατάξεις.
Type
Obligation to consider alternatives to collective dismissals
Added to database
08 May 2015
Article
PD 178/2002, Article 3, para. 1; Law 3846/2010, Article 4
Description
A dismissal is defined as 'collective dismissal' when affecting:
more than 6 employees in companies with 20 to 150 employees; or
5% of the workforce or 30 employees in companies with more than 150 employees.
Although there is no explicit legal obligation to consider alternatives to collective dismissals, the legislation discusses the possibility of alternatives, foreseeing that undertakings and undertakings with restricted economic activity may, instead of terminating an employment agreement, serve written notice temporarily laying-off salaried employees after they have first consulted with the employees’ legal representatives. The notification may be via a single notice posted in a conspicuous and accessible place at the undertaking. Consultation occurs at a place and time set by the employer. The relevant departments of the labour inspectorate (SEPE), the social insurance foundation (IKA) and the labour force employment organisation (OAED) must be notified by the employer in any manner of the declaration of temporary layoffs of all or part of the workforce.
The employees’ representatives are considered to be the legal representatives of the union that has at least 70% of the company’s employees as members, and the majority of those being dismissed. If there is more than one union in an undertaking or establishment, without any union covering 70% of the employees and the majority of those being dismissed, the persons nominated by the boards of the unions in a joint statement to the employer shall be considered the employees’ representatives. These representatives shall be designated in proportion to the strength of the unions, provided that they cover, overall, 70% of the employees and the majority of those being dismissed. If there is no union or unions meeting the conditions exposed in the preceding paragraphs, the employees shall be represented by a committee comprising of three members in the case of undertakings with between 20 and 50 employees, and five members for undertakings or establishments with more than 50 workers. If there are no employees’ representatives in the undertaking, information and consultation take place with all the employees.
Commentary
Under law 3846/2010, in the case of the temporary layoff measure being implemented, 'notification may be via a single notice posted in a conspicuous and accessible place at the undertaking. Consultation takes place at a place and time set by the employer' in derogation from the general provisions on information and consultation, as laid down in Presidential Decree 240/2006, which transposes Council Directive 2002/14/EC into the Greek law and provides that information and consultation take place at the 'appropriate time and place and in the appropriate fashion.' This measure was on the one hand criticised by the unions as restricting the employee's right to information and consultation, but on the other hand it was considered by the government and employers’ associations to be important in promoting alternative measures to avoid dismissals.
Additional metadata
Cost covered by
Employer
Involved actors other than national government
Trade union
Works council
Other
Involvement (others)
Labour inspectorate (SEPE), social insurance foundation (IKA), labour force employment organisation (OAED)
Thresholds
Affected employees: 7 Company size: 20 Additional information: No, applicable in all circumstances
This Eurofound research paper explores key trends in restructuring in recent years, highlighting the companies that announced the largest job losses and job gains in the EU. It builds on an analysis of company announcements recorded in Eurofound’s European Restructuring Monitor (ERM), alongside a new classification of restructuring events involving changes in company location.
Employers increasingly use tools such as email, SMS and messaging apps like WhatsApp or Signal to communicate with employees. While these technologies offer both efficiency and convenience, their use in communicating sensitive information, particularly for notifying employees of dismissal, raises legal concerns. This article explores the legal framework on dismissals across the EU, with a special focus on the use of digital means for communicating employment dismissals. Drawing on examples from various Member States, it examines the legal validity of digital dismissals.
In 2023, thousands of workers in big tech lost their jobs. Meta, Amazon, Google, Apple, Microsoft and Salesforce had been considered to offer good and secure jobs up to this point. Giants of the information and communication technology (ICT) sector, these companies are among the highest paying, with Eurostat data from 2022 indicating that workers in ICT had the second-highest median gross hourly earnings (surpassed only by earnings in the financial sector).[1] These layoffs were a shock, especially as the biggest companies had hired extensively during the COVID-19 pandemic. What happened in the two years after this redundancy wave – was that the end of the cuts or did the companies start expanding again?
In 2024, the automotive sector in the EU came to the fore in public and policy discussions. The focus was on the slowdown in electric vehicle (EV) sales, rising global competition, belated investments in new technologies, and the potential closure of production lines in Europe. A number of European car manufacturers and suppliers announced their intention to make large-scale redundancies and change long-standing collective agreements on job security and wages, while workers raised concerns amid demonstrations and industrial action.