Phase
Labour code
Native name
Code du travail
Type
Obligation to consider alternatives to collective dismissals
Added to database
08 May 2015

Article

L.1233-4, D.1233-2-1, R.1233-15, L. 1233-19, L. 1233-33 to L. 1233-35, L. 1233-46, L. 1233-57, L. 1233-57-1, L1233-57-14 to L1233-57-22, L. 1233-61 to L. 1233-64, L. 2254-2


Description

The labour code provides for several alternative solutions that an employer needs to consider before implementing a redundancy plan

Obligation to offer training prior to redundancies

According to article L. 1233-4, before a redundancy plan can be implemented, an employer is obliged to offer either individual or collective training to affected employees to ensure redeployment within the company or the group which it belongs to. If the employer fails to provide training, the employee may ask for compensation in court.

Redeployment obligation

If redeployment within the company or the group which it belongs to cannot be accomplished, the employer can resolve to redundancies. If the employer fails to provide redeployment where possible, the employee may ask for compensation in court.

The obligation to provide redeployment opportunities is limited to establishments located in France within the company or other undertakings of the groups which the company belongs to.

The employer can choose to transmit individual and personalised redeployment offers to single employees or a list of available positions within the company (or the group which it belongs to) to all affected employees

Regardless of the modality, the redeployment offer must be written and specific. According to article D. 1233-2-1, it must indicate the following:

  • the job position and description;
  • the name of the new employer;
  • the nature of the employment contract;
  • the work location;
  • the level of compensation;
  • the classification of the job.

Each offer must specify the time limit for the employee to apply for the job. The limit cannot be less than 15 days from the publication of the offer. In case the employee does not apply for the job offers proposed within the planned time limit, she is deemed to reject the offers.

These rules are applicable to dismissal procedures on economic grounds initiated since 23 December 2017. Non-compliance with these rules makes the redundancy unfair, meaning that the employee can claim compensation for damages.

Collective performance agreements

The collective performance agreements are an internal instrument of flexibility. It allows employers to negotiate working time arrangements, wages, terms and conditions for internal professional and geographical mobility of employees directly with trade unions (or other employee representatives at the company level), in order to meet the operational needs of the company or to safeguard and develop employment.

Even if not compulsory, this instrument is in force since 1 January 2018. It covers all private companies independently of their size and it replaces the former internal mobility agreements and agreements to maintain employment.

Employment protection plan

According to article L. 1233-61 through L. 1233-64, an employer needs to first inform and consult with employee representatives and to then draft a Employment protection plan (Plan de sauvegarde de l'emploi). The latter can be either negotiated as a company-level agreement with trade unions or unilaterally drafted with the information and consultation of employee representatives throughout the restructuring process.

The plan aims at avoiding forced dismissals and/or at reducing their numbers to a minimum. It has to include measures like internal mobility, creation of new activities by the company, external redeployment with a support scheme to help employees for business start-ups or business acquisitions, training, validation of professional experience, implementation of redeployment leave (congé de reclassement), access to the publicly-funded professional employability agreement (Contract de Sécurisation Professionnelle) that combines unemployment benefits with training and individual coaching, and measures aiming at working time reduction.

In both cases, where deemed necessary, the works council may call in an outside expert of its choice, at the employer's expense, to gather advise on collective redundancies involving 10 employees or more. The law defines the role of the expert with some details in articles L. 1233-34 and L. 1233-35.

According to article L. 1233-46, the employer needs to inform the labour inspectorate of its Job-saving plan at most the day following the first information meeting with employee representatives. Pursuant to article L. 1233-57, the labour inspectorate assesses the compliance with the information and consultation requirements and suggests improvements to the employment security plan, where needed. The labour inspectorate needs to approve the Job-saving plan for the latter to be considered valid.

The works council may propose alternative measures to the restructuring process. In this case, the employer is obliged to provide the works council with a detailed reply on the reasons to choose their restructuring plan over the one suggested by employee representatives.

Obligations of employers seeking external redeployment in case of redundancies

In companies that are not insolvent, not under judicial redress and with a workforce of more than 1,000 employees, the employer is obliged to attempt to find an investor before closing an establishment that would result in collective redundancies. This obligation does not apply in case of bankruptcy. According to article L. 1233-57-14, The employer is obliged to inform potential buyers of the intention to sell the establishment by any appropriate means. If the employer fails to seek a buyer, the labour inspectorate may refuse to approve the employment security plan. The works council is informed about the business transfer offers received by the employer. Additionally, the works council might issue an opinion, participate in the search for a buyer and make proposals.


Commentary

Redeployment obligation

In case redeployment is possible with the employee benefitting from training, the state may financially support the training and adaptation initiatives of employees in order to ensure they remain in employment.

Prior to the labour code reform in 2017, alternative working arrangements needed to be assessed not only within the company but also throughout the entire corporate group. As the obligation was not restricted to vacancies in France or in the EU, the affected employee could ask the employer to look for options globally within the group. Employees could as well define their restrictions on the potential job offers in terms of wage and geographical location. The employer then needed to provide a corresponding job offer. The amended labour code aims at simplifying the regulation formerly in place, as the latter was a source of legal litigation and uncertainty for employers.

Collective performance agreements

According to a qualitative analysis carried out by consultancy firm Sextant Expertise, around 18 agreements were concluded in companies with more than 300 employees and 33% of the agreements analysed aim at developing geographical and professional mobility with a view to adapting the company with flexibility to its environment.

DARES (2021) has published a study on the use of collective performance agreements (APC) during a pandemic as these agreements may have been used as a crisis management tool. DARES found that 429 APCs or amendments to a APC were concluded between 1 July 2019 and 31 December 2020, including 380 agreements in the strict sense, i.e. signed between management and one or more trade union organisations. The health crisis has led to a significant increase in the number of agreements: 247 APCs were signed in the last 3 quarters of 2020, compared with 133 in the previous 3 quarters. This 86% increase is all the more remarkable given that the total number of agreements rose only slightly over the same period (+8%) and even fell over the whole of 2020.

Employment protection plan

According to DARES (2023), in 2021, against an economic backdrop still marked by the health crisis, 610 Employment protection plan (plans de sauvegarde de l'emploi - PSE) have been implemented. These involve 63,300 people in 3,233 establishments. The metallurgy, transport and hotel-restaurant-tourism industries accounted for half of the planned contract terminations. 450 PSE were initiated in 2021, down 48% on 2020. In addition to these plans, 116 collective redundancy agreements (RCC) have been validated in 2021, mainly in the services sector (introduced on 1 January 2018, RCC is a method of terminating employment contracts that combines a collective agreement between the employer and the trade unions, and an individual agreement, enabling the employment contract to be terminated).


Additional metadata

Cost covered by
Employer
Involved actors other than national government
Trade union Works council Other
Involvement (others)
Labour inspectorate
Thresholds
Affected employees: No, applicable in all circumstances
Company size: No, applicable in all circumstances
Additional information: No, applicable in all circumstances

Citation

Eurofound (2015), France: Obligation to consider alternatives to collective dismissals, Restructuring legislation database, Dublin, https://apps.eurofound.europa.eu/legislationdb/obligation-to-consider-alternatives-to-collective-dismissals/france

Download as PDF