Eurofound's ERM database on restructuring-related legal regulations provides
information on regulations in the Member States of the European Union and Norway
which are explicitly or implicitly linked to anticipating and managing change.
Cyprus: Obligation to consider alternatives to collective dismissals
Phase
Collective Dismissals Law of 2001 (Law 28 (I)/2001)
Native name
Ν. 28(I)/2001 - Ο περί Ομαδικών Απολύσεων Νόμος του 2001
Type
Obligation to consider alternatives to collective dismissals
Added to database
08 May 2015
Article
Articles 4, 6 and 8 of the Collective Dismissals Law of 2001 (Law 28 (I)/2001)
Description
If an employer intends to proceed with collective dismissals (within 30 days, at least 10 dismissals in companies with 21-99 employees, at least 10% of workforce in companies with 100-299 employees or at least 30 dismissals in larger firms), he/she is obliged by Article 4 of the Collective Dismissals Law to enter in good time into consultations with the employees' representatives. The employer must have completed the consultations with the employees' representatives before he/she notifies the relevant authority on the intention to proceed to collective dismissals, since he/she has to provide information to the relevant authority also on the outcome of these consultations (Article 6). Collective dismissals can take effect at the earliest 30 days after the relevant authority has been notified (Article 8). These consultations should cover at least following issues:
Possible ways and means for avoiding collective dismissals or the reduction of number of employees affected, and
ways and means for lessening the impact of collective dismissals, by designing social measures, which should, among others, have the target of reemployment or retraining of dismissed employees.
Commentary
The legislation is rarely activated in Cyprus, since the definition of collective dismissals requires the dismissal of at least 10 employees. However, during the economic and financial crisis, particularly in 2012 and 2013, an increased number of collective dismissals cases was observed. The Labour Relations Department reviewed more than 140 cases during these years.
According to trade unions' evaluation this particular provision is more likely to be applied in organised companies, i.e. in companies where trade unions are present, demand and ensure that the legislation is respected.
Additional metadata
Cost covered by
Employer
Involved actors other than national government
Trade union
Involvement (others)
None
Thresholds
Affected employees: 10 Company size: 21 Additional information: No, applicable in all circumstances
This Eurofound research paper explores key trends in restructuring in recent years, highlighting the companies that announced the largest job losses and job gains in the EU. It builds on an analysis of company announcements recorded in Eurofound’s European Restructuring Monitor (ERM), alongside a new classification of restructuring events involving changes in company location.
Employers increasingly use tools such as email, SMS and messaging apps like WhatsApp or Signal to communicate with employees. While these technologies offer both efficiency and convenience, their use in communicating sensitive information, particularly for notifying employees of dismissal, raises legal concerns. This article explores the legal framework on dismissals across the EU, with a special focus on the use of digital means for communicating employment dismissals. Drawing on examples from various Member States, it examines the legal validity of digital dismissals.
In 2023, thousands of workers in big tech lost their jobs. Meta, Amazon, Google, Apple, Microsoft and Salesforce had been considered to offer good and secure jobs up to this point. Giants of the information and communication technology (ICT) sector, these companies are among the highest paying, with Eurostat data from 2022 indicating that workers in ICT had the second-highest median gross hourly earnings (surpassed only by earnings in the financial sector).[1] These layoffs were a shock, especially as the biggest companies had hired extensively during the COVID-19 pandemic. What happened in the two years after this redundancy wave – was that the end of the cuts or did the companies start expanding again?
In 2024, the automotive sector in the EU came to the fore in public and policy discussions. The focus was on the slowdown in electric vehicle (EV) sales, rising global competition, belated investments in new technologies, and the potential closure of production lines in Europe. A number of European car manufacturers and suppliers announced their intention to make large-scale redundancies and change long-standing collective agreements on job security and wages, while workers raised concerns amid demonstrations and industrial action.