Eurofound's ERM database on restructuring-related legal regulations provides
information on regulations in the Member States of the European Union and Norway
which are explicitly or implicitly linked to anticipating and managing change.
Austria: Obligation to consider alternatives to collective dismissals
Phase
Labour Constitution Act (ArbVG)
Native name
Arbeitsverfassungsgesetz (ArbVG)
Type
Obligation to consider alternatives to collective dismissals
Added to database
08 May 2015
Article
109
Description
In the case of planned changes in the business operation, including collective dismissals (within 30 days, dismissal of at least 5 employees in companies with 21–99 employees, at least 5% of the workforce in companies with 100-600 employees, at least 30 employees in larger firms or at least 5 employees aged 50+), the employer is obliged to inform the works council and, if demanded by the works council, consult on the implementation of the changes, including measures to avoid or reduce collective dismissals.
If the planned changes bring about negative consequences (understood as reduction of the income, longer commuting obligations and job loss) for all or a considerable number of employees in companies with permanently at least 20 staff members, a social plan can be agreed to avoid, reduce or remove the negative consequences for the employees. If the parties fail to agree on a social plan, the works council may refer the case to a public mediation and arbitration board (local labour and social court) consisting of a professional judge, two representatives of the company to be nominated by the employer and the works council and two other members from a list of people nominated to such boards. The board has to decide as quickly as possible, taking into account the interest of the company as well as of the employees. The decision of the board has to be implemented.
Commentary
The law does not directly include an obligation to consider alternatives to collective dismissals for employers. However, the obligation to inform and consult the works council before planned changes usually leads to negotiations about the number of dismissals and how jobs can be saved e.g. by reducing working-time etc.
Additional metadata
Cost covered by
None
Involved actors other than national government
Works council
Other
Involvement (others)
Mediation and arbitration board
Thresholds
Affected employees: 5 Company size: 21 Additional information: No, applicable in all circumstances
Sources
DG Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities/Héra (2011), Selected companies’ legal obligations regarding restructuring
This Eurofound research paper explores key trends in restructuring in recent years, highlighting the companies that announced the largest job losses and job gains in the EU. It builds on an analysis of company announcements recorded in Eurofound’s European Restructuring Monitor (ERM), alongside a new classification of restructuring events involving changes in company location.
Employers increasingly use tools such as email, SMS and messaging apps like WhatsApp or Signal to communicate with employees. While these technologies offer both efficiency and convenience, their use in communicating sensitive information, particularly for notifying employees of dismissal, raises legal concerns. This article explores the legal framework on dismissals across the EU, with a special focus on the use of digital means for communicating employment dismissals. Drawing on examples from various Member States, it examines the legal validity of digital dismissals.
In 2023, thousands of workers in big tech lost their jobs. Meta, Amazon, Google, Apple, Microsoft and Salesforce had been considered to offer good and secure jobs up to this point. Giants of the information and communication technology (ICT) sector, these companies are among the highest paying, with Eurostat data from 2022 indicating that workers in ICT had the second-highest median gross hourly earnings (surpassed only by earnings in the financial sector).[1] These layoffs were a shock, especially as the biggest companies had hired extensively during the COVID-19 pandemic. What happened in the two years after this redundancy wave – was that the end of the cuts or did the companies start expanding again?
In 2024, the automotive sector in the EU came to the fore in public and policy discussions. The focus was on the slowdown in electric vehicle (EV) sales, rising global competition, belated investments in new technologies, and the potential closure of production lines in Europe. A number of European car manufacturers and suppliers announced their intention to make large-scale redundancies and change long-standing collective agreements on job security and wages, while workers raised concerns amid demonstrations and industrial action.