Eurofound's ERM database on restructuring-related legal regulations provides
information on regulations in the Member States of the European Union and Norway
which are explicitly or implicitly linked to anticipating and managing change.
Austria: Obligation to consider alternatives to collective dismissals
Phase
Labour Constitution Act (ArbVG)
Native name
Arbeitsverfassungsgesetz (ArbVG)
Type
Obligation to consider alternatives to collective dismissals
Added to database
08 May 2015
Article
109
Description
In the case of planned changes in the business operation, including collective dismissals (within 30 days, dismissal of at least 5 employees in companies with 21–99 employees, at least 5% of the workforce in companies with 100-600 employees, at least 30 employees in larger firms or at least 5 employees aged 50+), the employer is obliged to inform the works council and, if demanded by the works council, consult on the implementation of the changes, including measures to avoid or reduce collective dismissals.
If the planned changes bring about negative consequences (understood as reduction of the income, longer commuting obligations and job loss) for all or a considerable number of employees in companies with permanently at least 20 staff members, a social plan can be agreed to avoid, reduce or remove the negative consequences for the employees. If the parties fail to agree on a social plan, the works council may refer the case to a public mediation and arbitration board (local labour and social court) consisting of a professional judge, two representatives of the company to be nominated by the employer and the works council and two other members from a list of people nominated to such boards. The board has to decide as quickly as possible, taking into account the interest of the company as well as of the employees. The decision of the board has to be implemented.
Commentary
The law does not directly include an obligation to consider alternatives to collective dismissals for employers. However, the obligation to inform and consult the works council before planned changes usually leads to negotiations about the number of dismissals and how jobs can be saved e.g. by reducing working-time etc.
Additional metadata
Cost covered by
None
Involved actors other than national government
Works council
Other
Involvement (others)
Mediation and arbitration board
Thresholds
Affected employees: 5 Company size: 21 Additional information: No, applicable in all circumstances
Sources
DG Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities/Héra (2011), Selected companies’ legal obligations regarding restructuring
While large-scale redundancies at major manufacturers dominate the headlines, the true impact of this restructuring is being felt most acutely within the wider supply chain. This article examines the uneven distribution of job losses, the growing geographical shifts in production, ...
Eurofound’s ERM restructuring legislation database offers an overview of key restructuring-related regulations in the EU Member States and Norway. Its content is continuously updated to reflect any changes made by national legislators in response to, for instance, policy shifts, legal ...
Can Europe still achieve its ambitions for battery manufacturing? To answer this, the article looks at data from Eurofound’s European Restructuring Monitor and explores what recent large-scale restructuring events reveal about the state of play in the EU battery sector.
This working paper offers a comprehensive methodological overview of the European Restructuring Monitor (ERM) databases. Even though the methodology has not changed over time, new categories have been added, and the way it has been used by researchers and policymakers ...