Eurofound's ERM database on restructuring-related legal regulations provides
information on regulations in the Member States of the European Union and Norway
which are explicitly or implicitly linked to anticipating and managing change.
Poland: Notice period to employees
Phase
Act of 26.06.1974 - Labour Code
Native name
Ustawa z dnia 26.06.1974 - Kodeks Pracy
Type
Notice period to employees
Added to database
08 May 2015
Article
25, 36
Description
The notice period for terminating all types of employment contracts (permanent, fixed-term, probationary) depends on the employee's length of service with the employer.
Two weeks' notice is required if the employee has been employed for less than six months, and one month's notice if the employee has been employed for at least six months. If the employee has been employed for at least three years, three months' notice should be given.
The probationary contract can be for a maximum of three months. Another probationary contract can only be signed with the same employee:
if it concerns another job,
after 3 years.
The probationary contract can be terminated with a notice period of
3 working days if the probationary period does not exceed 2 weeks;
1 week if the probationary period is longer than 2 weeks;
2 weeks if the probationary period is 3 months.
In the case of collective dismissal, the notice period is the same. The notice period can be extended in the employment contract or collective agreement, but in an asymmetrical way, i.e. it can only be extended for situations where the contract is terminated by the employer and not by the employee.
Commentary
Unifying the notice period for all kinds of employment contracts (excluding probationary period) was introduced in 2016 after the trade union NSZZ Solidarnosc had complained to the European Commission for improper implementation of the Fixed-term Work Directive 90/77/EC in Poland.
Additional metadata
Cost covered by
None
Involved actors other than national government
National government
Involvement (others)
None
Thresholds
Affected employees: No, applicable in all circumstances Company size: No, applicable in all circumstances Additional information: No, applicable in all circumstances
Sources
Ius Laboris (2011), Individual Dismissals Across Europe, Brussels.
Ius Laboris (2009), Collective Redundancies Guide, Brussels.
This Eurofound research paper explores key trends in restructuring in recent years, highlighting the companies that announced the largest job losses and job gains in the EU. It builds on an analysis of company announcements recorded in Eurofound’s European Restructuring Monitor (ERM), alongside a new classification of restructuring events involving changes in company location.
Employers increasingly use tools such as email, SMS and messaging apps like WhatsApp or Signal to communicate with employees. While these technologies offer both efficiency and convenience, their use in communicating sensitive information, particularly for notifying employees of dismissal, raises legal concerns. This article explores the legal framework on dismissals across the EU, with a special focus on the use of digital means for communicating employment dismissals. Drawing on examples from various Member States, it examines the legal validity of digital dismissals.
In 2023, thousands of workers in big tech lost their jobs. Meta, Amazon, Google, Apple, Microsoft and Salesforce had been considered to offer good and secure jobs up to this point. Giants of the information and communication technology (ICT) sector, these companies are among the highest paying, with Eurostat data from 2022 indicating that workers in ICT had the second-highest median gross hourly earnings (surpassed only by earnings in the financial sector).[1] These layoffs were a shock, especially as the biggest companies had hired extensively during the COVID-19 pandemic. What happened in the two years after this redundancy wave – was that the end of the cuts or did the companies start expanding again?
In 2024, the automotive sector in the EU came to the fore in public and policy discussions. The focus was on the slowdown in electric vehicle (EV) sales, rising global competition, belated investments in new technologies, and the potential closure of production lines in Europe. A number of European car manufacturers and suppliers announced their intention to make large-scale redundancies and change long-standing collective agreements on job security and wages, while workers raised concerns amid demonstrations and industrial action.