Eurofound's ERM database on restructuring-related legal regulations provides
information on regulations in the Member States of the European Union and Norway
which are explicitly or implicitly linked to anticipating and managing change.
Italy: Notice period to employees
Phase
Civil code; National sectoral collective agreements; Law 23 July 1991, no. 223, Rules on the Wage Guarantee Fund, redundancies, unemployment benefits, enforcement of European directives, job placement, and other labour market provisions
Native name
Codice Civile; Contratti collettivi nazionali di settore; Legge 23 luglio 1991, n. 223, Norme in materia di cassa integrazione, mobilità, trattamenti di disoccupazione, attuazione di direttive della Comunità europea, avviamento al lavoro ed altre disposizioni in materia di mercato del lavoro
Type
Notice period to employees
Added to database
08 May 2015
Article
Civil code, articles 2118 and 2119; Law no. 223/1991, article 24
Description
Generally, the party exercising the right to withdraw from the employment contract must comply with a notice period.
The obligation to give a notice period concerns almost all cases of termination of the employment relationship (dismissal and resignation), with some limited exceptions regarding the hypotheses of:
just cause, that is, for an event or behavior that does not allow the relationship to continue, even provisionally;
consensual resolution, that is when the parties have formally agreed differently.
Failure to give notice leads to compensation for damages, financially quantified in the remuneration that would have been due to the worker for the period of work not carried out.
The civil code demands the regulation of the duration of the notice period in case of individual dismissals to collective agreements, which normally set it on the basis of seniority and staff level, and on the size of the company. Variation, therefore, exists in different sectors of economic activity.
A specific regulation exists in case of collective dismissals (i.e. the lay-off of at least five workers within 120 days in companies with more than 15 employees). In case of collective dismissals, the Italian law envisages the recourse to a collective procedure lasting 75 days, in which the decision to collectively dismiss workers is jointly examined between the employer and employee representatives (45 days) and, in case of failure to reach an agreement, also by public institutions (in the form of the territory labour inspectorate). Once this procedure is concluded, the employer can legitimately dismiss the redundant workers even in the absence of an agreement. Employees to be made redundant in the framework of collective dismissals need to be informed in writing. As it is the case also of individual dismissals, the notice period for permanent employees is fixed by collective agreements. An indemnity can be paid in lieu of the notice period as well. Temporary employees are not covered by the notice period but their contracts cannot be terminated in advance on economic grounds.
Commentary
No information available.
Additional metadata
Cost covered by
None
Involved actors other than national government
Regional/local government
Trade union
Involvement (others)
None
Thresholds
Affected employees: 5 Company size: 16 Additional information: No, applicable in all circumstances
This Eurofound research paper explores key trends in restructuring in recent years, highlighting the companies that announced the largest job losses and job gains in the EU. It builds on an analysis of company announcements recorded in Eurofound’s European Restructuring Monitor (ERM), alongside a new classification of restructuring events involving changes in company location.
Employers increasingly use tools such as email, SMS and messaging apps like WhatsApp or Signal to communicate with employees. While these technologies offer both efficiency and convenience, their use in communicating sensitive information, particularly for notifying employees of dismissal, raises legal concerns. This article explores the legal framework on dismissals across the EU, with a special focus on the use of digital means for communicating employment dismissals. Drawing on examples from various Member States, it examines the legal validity of digital dismissals.
In 2023, thousands of workers in big tech lost their jobs. Meta, Amazon, Google, Apple, Microsoft and Salesforce had been considered to offer good and secure jobs up to this point. Giants of the information and communication technology (ICT) sector, these companies are among the highest paying, with Eurostat data from 2022 indicating that workers in ICT had the second-highest median gross hourly earnings (surpassed only by earnings in the financial sector).[1] These layoffs were a shock, especially as the biggest companies had hired extensively during the COVID-19 pandemic. What happened in the two years after this redundancy wave – was that the end of the cuts or did the companies start expanding again?
In 2024, the automotive sector in the EU came to the fore in public and policy discussions. The focus was on the slowdown in electric vehicle (EV) sales, rising global competition, belated investments in new technologies, and the potential closure of production lines in Europe. A number of European car manufacturers and suppliers announced their intention to make large-scale redundancies and change long-standing collective agreements on job security and wages, while workers raised concerns amid demonstrations and industrial action.