Eurofound's ERM database on restructuring-related legal regulations provides
information on regulations in the Member States of the European Union and Norway
which are explicitly or implicitly linked to anticipating and managing change.
Spain: Employment protection in relation to business transfers
Phase
The Spanish 'Workers Statute' / Law 12/2001 on urgent measures to reform the labour market for increasing employment levels and the improvement of the quality of work
Native name
Estatuto de los Trabajadores / Ley 12/2001, de 9 de julio, de medidas urgentes de reforma del mercado de trabajo para el incremento del empleo y la mejora de su calidad
Type
Employment protection in relation to business transfers
Added to database
27 September 2016
Article
Article 44 of the Spanish 'Workers Statute' modified by article 2 of Law 12/2001 for the improvement of the quality of work
Description
Spanish legislation only applies to transfer of undertakings if the transfer affects an economic entity that retains its own identity and autonomy. Accordingly, a change of ownership (e.g. merger) which changes the employer's legal entity does not fall within the definition of business transfer. Outsourcing is also excluded from the framework of transfers of undertaking, except in instances where the new employer acquires the basic infrastructure.
The economic entity must consist of an organised group of means aiming to carry out an economic activity, whether essential or auxiliary, and must have autonomy in terms of conducting its own activities. Under Spanish law, two specific factors must be shown in order to trigger such rules. These are:
the objective factor: the tangible delivery of all the elements which are essential to enable the undertaking to continue to operate, and
the subjective factor: the substitution of the old employer for the new one. It is not necessary that there is a contractual relationship between them.
If the transfer involves the transfer of labour contracts alone, the rules will not apply. In such cases the explicit consent of the employees is required, not of their representatives.
In general, all employees are covered under the legislation. According to the Statute of Workers, employees are ‘employed workers that carry out a voluntary and remunerated labour activity within an organisation and under the direction of another (natural or legal) person, named employer'. However, it is unclear if this extends to apprentices and seconded employees.
All obligations enshrined in the employment contract (both permanent and fixed-term contracts) are transferred to the new employer without change, including benefits and pension contributions as agreed. Employees on temporary contracts are entitled to the same rights and benefits as permanent employees. Moreover, the transferee is also liable for all debts incurred by the previous owner, particularly those arising from employment claims.
If the employees are covered by a collective agreement, this agreement will remain in place until it expires, or until a new agreement can be reached with unions.
Commentary
Article 44 of Spanish Workers Statute transposed the European Directive 2001/23/EC. It provides that, in case of transfer of undertaking, the contract will not be cancelled and the new employer will be liable with regard to the contractual obligations. Moreover, if employees are covered by a collective agreement, this agreement will remain in place until it expires, or until a new agreement can be reached with unions.
In the pre-crisis period, most juridical and case law debates focused on those cases where it was needed to analyse if the undertaking, business or part of an undertaking preserved its autonomy, as a result of the different implications provided in the law and the Directive 2001/23/EC. If autonomy is preserved, the status and function of the representatives or of the representation of the employees affected by the transfer shall be preserved on the same terms and subject to the same conditions as existed before (Article 44.5 Spanish Workers Statute).
During the Great Recession, however, common transfers of undertakings were replaced by transfers involving companies facing economic problems. Due to those circumstances, in recent years the courts have detected cases whereby transfers of undertakings were declared void for being assessed as fraudulent transfers aiming to reduce the workforce. In some cases, the courts have declared void collective dismissals implemented before the transfer. In other cases, the courts declared void the dismissals or modification of working conditions implemented after the transfer.
Additional metadata
Cost covered by
None
Involved actors other than national government
Trade union
Works council
Involvement (others)
None
Thresholds
Affected employees: No, applicable in all circumstances Company size: No, applicable in all circumstances Additional information: No, applicable in all circumstances
Eurofound (2016), Spain: Employment protection in relation to business transfers, Restructuring legislation database, Dublin,
https://apps.eurofound.europa.eu/legislationdb/employment-protection-in-relation-to-business-transfers/spain
This Eurofound research paper explores key trends in restructuring in recent years, highlighting the companies that announced the largest job losses and job gains in the EU. It builds on an analysis of company announcements recorded in Eurofound’s European Restructuring Monitor (ERM), alongside a new classification of restructuring events involving changes in company location.
Employers increasingly use tools such as email, SMS and messaging apps like WhatsApp or Signal to communicate with employees. While these technologies offer both efficiency and convenience, their use in communicating sensitive information, particularly for notifying employees of dismissal, raises legal concerns. This article explores the legal framework on dismissals across the EU, with a special focus on the use of digital means for communicating employment dismissals. Drawing on examples from various Member States, it examines the legal validity of digital dismissals.
In 2023, thousands of workers in big tech lost their jobs. Meta, Amazon, Google, Apple, Microsoft and Salesforce had been considered to offer good and secure jobs up to this point. Giants of the information and communication technology (ICT) sector, these companies are among the highest paying, with Eurostat data from 2022 indicating that workers in ICT had the second-highest median gross hourly earnings (surpassed only by earnings in the financial sector).[1] These layoffs were a shock, especially as the biggest companies had hired extensively during the COVID-19 pandemic. What happened in the two years after this redundancy wave – was that the end of the cuts or did the companies start expanding again?
In 2024, the automotive sector in the EU came to the fore in public and policy discussions. The focus was on the slowdown in electric vehicle (EV) sales, rising global competition, belated investments in new technologies, and the potential closure of production lines in Europe. A number of European car manufacturers and suppliers announced their intention to make large-scale redundancies and change long-standing collective agreements on job security and wages, while workers raised concerns amid demonstrations and industrial action.