Eurofound's ERM database on restructuring-related legal regulations provides
information on regulations in the Member States of the European Union and Norway
which are explicitly or implicitly linked to anticipating and managing change.
Slovenia: Employment protection in relation to business transfers
Phase
Employment Relationship Act (ZDR-1)
Native name
Zakon o delovnih razmerjih (ZDR-1)
Type
Employment protection in relation to business transfers
Added to database
16 December 2016
Article
75 and 76
Description
In the event of a business transfer the rights and obligations arising from the employment contracts (both permanent and fixed-term contracts) with the transferor employer will be transferred to the new employer (transferee employer), whether the business transfers concerns a part of a company or a whole company. A business transfer is a 'legal transfer of an undertaking or part of an undertaking carried out on the basis of an act, another regulation, a legal transaction and/or a final court decision, or due to a merger or division' (ZDR-1, article 75, paragraph 1).
The collective agreement established prior to the business transfer will continue to apply for at least one year after the transfer, unless the collective agreement is set to expire before that, or if a new collective agreement is drawn up before the one-year mark.
An employee is defined as 'any natural person who has entered into an employment relationship on the basis of a concluded contract of employment' (ZDR-1, article 5). If the rights of the employees are weakened, or if the working conditions are significantly altered within two years of the transfer and the employee for this reason chooses to terminate the employment relationship, the employee is entitled to the same rights as if the employer had dismissed the employee for business reasons. This includes the notice period, the right to severance pay and other rights associated with seniority of the position. In this case the years of service with the transferor employer and the transferee employer have to be taken into account and the transferor employer and the transferee employer are jointly liable for claims of these employees.
The majority owner of the transferor employer (holding more than a 25% share of the company’s capital or at least 25% of voting rights) is jointly liable for claims of workers in the event of bankruptcy or compulsory winding-up of the transferee if this is initiated within two years after the transfer. The transferor employer’s liability correlates with the years of service of a particular worker with the transferor employer. Other non-majority owners are subsidiarily liable for the claims of the transferred workers.
If an employee refuses to be transferred to the transferee employer, the transferor employer may extraordinarily cancel the employment contract. In this case the employee has no right to a notice period, severance pay, and unemployment benefits.
The transferor employer and the transferee employer are obliged to inform the trade union (or all workers if there is no company trade union) at the employer at least 30 days prior to a transfer of the following:
the date or the proposed date of the transfer,
the reasons for the transfer,
the legal, economic and social implications of the transfer for workers, and
the measures envisaged for workers.
The both have to consult the trade union about the third and fourth issue with the intention of achieving an agreement.
Commentary
According to the Parliamentary Committee, the ability to change of employer turned out to be a tool for various misuses: workers were transferred from the primary company to a so called 'letterbox company' without assets with the purpose of evading employer’s liabilities towards employees. After the completion of the transfer, the letterbox company went bankrupt and workers were left without wages and severance pay because the company had no assets they could sell that would enable them to pay off the claims of the employees. Transferred workers were often old and/or disabled workers with large claims due to their seniority status. Trade unions and media significantly contributed to raising public awareness on this issue. The extension of rights of transferred employees (the right to terminate the employment contract if working conditions were significantly altered within the period of two years) and the joint liability of the transferor employer and the transferee employer in 2013 successfully terminated such practices.
Additional metadata
Cost covered by
None
Involved actors other than national government
Trade union
Other
Involvement (others)
Transferor employer, transferee employer
Thresholds
Affected employees: No, applicable in all circumstances Company size: No, applicable in all circumstances Additional information: No, applicable in all circumstances
Eurofound (2016), Slovenia: Employment protection in relation to business transfers, Restructuring legislation database, Dublin,
https://apps.eurofound.europa.eu/legislationdb/employment-protection-in-relation-to-business-transfers/slovenia
This Eurofound research paper explores key trends in restructuring in recent years, highlighting the companies that announced the largest job losses and job gains in the EU. It builds on an analysis of company announcements recorded in Eurofound’s European Restructuring Monitor (ERM), alongside a new classification of restructuring events involving changes in company location.
Employers increasingly use tools such as email, SMS and messaging apps like WhatsApp or Signal to communicate with employees. While these technologies offer both efficiency and convenience, their use in communicating sensitive information, particularly for notifying employees of dismissal, raises legal concerns. This article explores the legal framework on dismissals across the EU, with a special focus on the use of digital means for communicating employment dismissals. Drawing on examples from various Member States, it examines the legal validity of digital dismissals.
In 2023, thousands of workers in big tech lost their jobs. Meta, Amazon, Google, Apple, Microsoft and Salesforce had been considered to offer good and secure jobs up to this point. Giants of the information and communication technology (ICT) sector, these companies are among the highest paying, with Eurostat data from 2022 indicating that workers in ICT had the second-highest median gross hourly earnings (surpassed only by earnings in the financial sector).[1] These layoffs were a shock, especially as the biggest companies had hired extensively during the COVID-19 pandemic. What happened in the two years after this redundancy wave – was that the end of the cuts or did the companies start expanding again?
In 2024, the automotive sector in the EU came to the fore in public and policy discussions. The focus was on the slowdown in electric vehicle (EV) sales, rising global competition, belated investments in new technologies, and the potential closure of production lines in Europe. A number of European car manufacturers and suppliers announced their intention to make large-scale redundancies and change long-standing collective agreements on job security and wages, while workers raised concerns amid demonstrations and industrial action.