Eurofound's ERM database on restructuring-related legal regulations provides
information on regulations in the Member States of the European Union and Norway
which are explicitly or implicitly linked to anticipating and managing change.
Poland: Employment protection in relation to business transfers
Phase
Act of 26.06.1974 -Labour Code; Act of 23.05.1991 on Trade Unions; Act of 5 July 2018 on the succession management of a natural person enterprise
Native name
Ustawa z 26.06.1974 -Kodeks Pracy; Ustawa z dnia 23.05.1991 o związkach zawodowych; Ustawa z dnia 5 lipca 2018 r. o zarządzie sukcesyjnym przedsiębiorstwem osoby fizycznej
Type
Employment protection in relation to business transfers
Added to database
27 September 2016
Article
Article 23(1) of the Labour Code; Article 26(1) of the Act on Trade Unions; Article 31 of the Act on the succession management of a natural person enterprise
Description
There is no formal definition of a transfer, however, it has been developed by case law and the understanding is that a transfer occurs when, as a result of certain legal actions, tasks and/or assets are taken over by another entity. An undertaking (or part thereof) is understood as a place of work for the employee. When ownership has changed by a sale of shares alone, this will not be considered a transfer, according to the law.
The law protects all persons considered 'employees' without difference between those on permanent contracts and fixed-term contracts, including those inactive due to maternity or sick leave. However, those persons who work for a company de facto but are employed by another entity are not covered (e.g. temporary workers, seconded staff etc.).
As a result of the transfer, the transferee becomes, by operation of law, a party to the employment contracts made between the transferor and employee. Moreover, the transferee must also agree to all obligations agreed to in collective agreements (for a period of one year), and agreements regarding employee benefits. Although there has yet to be a case to establish formal precedence, it is understood that pension obligations are also transferred.
The transferee also becomes responsible for all liabilities concerning employment, or in the case of partial transfers, for the liabilities arising from the staff which were involved in the transfer. In both cases, however, the transferor remains jointly liable for obligations which arose prior to the transfer.
If the transferee wishes to make amendments to individual or collective employment contracts, they must initiate the 'notice of alteration of terms of employment' as regulated in law. However, in no circumstances can the transfer alone be sufficient reason to change the terms outlined in the contracts.
The situation of employees in an enterprise owned by an entrepreneur - a natural person - after the death of the owner can be considered as a specific kind of business transfer. In the past, the death of the owner led to automatic termination of the enterprise, including expiration of contract with all employees. Under the new legislation (the act came into force on 25 November 2018), it is possible for the enterprise to continue its existence, for example by introduction of temporary transition-period management. Also the rights of the spouse and/or heirs of the deceased entrepreneur are strengthened. The new act allows to use the legal company name with the addition of 'inheritance' by heirs of the owner from the day of opening the legacy to the day of division of legacy. As a result, this indirectly improves the situation of workers as regards possibility to continue working.
Commentary
Since 1 March 2017, a new technical identicode '800' (to be sent by the employer to the Social Insurance Institution - ZUS) has been introduced which should be used when an employer decides to terminate a worker's social security due to a transfer. This will allow the Social Insurance Institution to be aware of the transfer, to monitor the movement of workers and to keep up with the regularity of payers' duties. It is too early to assess the effectiveness of introducing this identicode in light of employees' rights.
Additional metadata
Cost covered by
None
Involved actors other than national government
Other
Involvement (others)
Social Insurance Institution (ZUS)
Thresholds
Affected employees: No, applicable in all circumstances Company size: No, applicable in all circumstances Additional information: No, applicable in all circumstances
Eurofound (2016), Poland: Employment protection in relation to business transfers, Restructuring legislation database, Dublin,
https://apps.eurofound.europa.eu/legislationdb/employment-protection-in-relation-to-business-transfers/poland
This Eurofound research paper explores key trends in restructuring in recent years, highlighting the companies that announced the largest job losses and job gains in the EU. It builds on an analysis of company announcements recorded in Eurofound’s European Restructuring Monitor (ERM), alongside a new classification of restructuring events involving changes in company location.
Employers increasingly use tools such as email, SMS and messaging apps like WhatsApp or Signal to communicate with employees. While these technologies offer both efficiency and convenience, their use in communicating sensitive information, particularly for notifying employees of dismissal, raises legal concerns. This article explores the legal framework on dismissals across the EU, with a special focus on the use of digital means for communicating employment dismissals. Drawing on examples from various Member States, it examines the legal validity of digital dismissals.
In 2023, thousands of workers in big tech lost their jobs. Meta, Amazon, Google, Apple, Microsoft and Salesforce had been considered to offer good and secure jobs up to this point. Giants of the information and communication technology (ICT) sector, these companies are among the highest paying, with Eurostat data from 2022 indicating that workers in ICT had the second-highest median gross hourly earnings (surpassed only by earnings in the financial sector).[1] These layoffs were a shock, especially as the biggest companies had hired extensively during the COVID-19 pandemic. What happened in the two years after this redundancy wave – was that the end of the cuts or did the companies start expanding again?
In 2024, the automotive sector in the EU came to the fore in public and policy discussions. The focus was on the slowdown in electric vehicle (EV) sales, rising global competition, belated investments in new technologies, and the potential closure of production lines in Europe. A number of European car manufacturers and suppliers announced their intention to make large-scale redundancies and change long-standing collective agreements on job security and wages, while workers raised concerns amid demonstrations and industrial action.