Eurofound's ERM database on restructuring-related legal regulations provides
information on regulations in the Member States of the European Union and Norway
which are explicitly or implicitly linked to anticipating and managing change.
Norway: Employment protection in relation to business transfers
Phase
Working Environment Act
Native name
Arbeidsmiljøloven
Type
Employment protection in relation to business transfers
Added to database
27 September 2016
Article
16-1 to 16-7
Description
The definition of the term 'undertaking' (or part thereof) is in line with that of the European Court of Justice (ECJ). This means that in order for Norwegian legislation to apply, the unit being transferred must be independent from an economic and organisational point of view. This implies an organised group of people and assets which enable the unit to be involved in economic activities. Moreover, Norwegian law uses the seven indicators as defined by the ECJ to decide whether a transfer of undertaking has occurred. These are:
whether tangible assets have been transferred,
the type of business or undertaking concerned,
the value of intangible assets at the time of the transfer,
whether the majority of employees are retained,
whether customers are transferred,
the similarity between the activities,
the duration of any interruption in the performance of the activities.
These rules do not apply in cases of the purchase of insolvent enterprises or if a change in stocks or shares equate to a technical change in ownership.
All employees (both those on permanent and fixed-term contracts, including those inactive through sickness or maternity leave) are covered by the legislation. However, the employment relationship must be fixed, and therefore consultants and subcontractors are not covered. The existence of an employment relationship is settled in accordance with §1-8 of the Working Environment Act, which states that a person who performs work in the service of another is an employee and thereby covered by the act. Further criteria are developed through case law and suggest that the person must be in a subordinate position, or otherwise owe a personal obligation to work. In cases where only a section or part of an enterprise will be transferred, those employees who are necessary to keep the transferring business operational will transfer.
Employees are entitled to invoke their 'right of reservation' and object to the transfer, however they must do so in writing within a time limit set by the employer. The time limit cannot be shorter than 14 days after the employer has informed their employees of the transfer. In some cases, if the transfer leads to 'not insignificant' negative changes for the employee, he/she may also choose to stay with the former employer. Invoking this right will, however, imply a risk of being redundant if there are no positions available. If an employee has worked a total of at least 12 months during the two years prior to the transfer, he/she has a preferential right to a new appointment with the transferor should such a position become available within one year of the transfer.
All rights and obligations involved in the employment agreement between the transferor and transferee must be upheld after the transfer. This includes benefits and pension rights.
Collective agreements are also transferred. If the company wishes to change such rights it must inform the unions no later than three weeks after the transfer. If the collective agreement is not transferred, the employees have the right to retain their individual rights following from the collective agreement until the agreement expires or another collective agreement is concluded.
All other changes to individual employment contracts, including potential dismissal, must not be made in connection with the transfer. If such changes can be proved to be in direct relation to such, the changes and/or dismissal will be considered invalid and the employer will be liable for damages owed as well as renewal of any contracts which were illegally dismissed.
Commentary
In order to decide whether a transfer is covered by these regulations, European Court of Justice (ECJ) case law will be of great importance. However, it is worth noting that case law to a certain degree gives the employees stronger protection than stated in the EU legislation, as the employee in certain situation may have the right to stay with the former employer.
Additional metadata
Cost covered by
None
Involved actors other than national government
National government
Involvement (others)
None
Thresholds
Affected employees: No, applicable in all circumstances Company size: No, applicable in all circumstances Additional information: No, applicable in all circumstances
Sources
Ius Laboris (2009), Transfers of Undertakings Guide
Eurofound (2016), Norway: Employment protection in relation to business transfers, Restructuring legislation database, Dublin,
https://apps.eurofound.europa.eu/legislationdb/employment-protection-in-relation-to-business-transfers/norway
This Eurofound research paper explores key trends in restructuring in recent years, highlighting the companies that announced the largest job losses and job gains in the EU. It builds on an analysis of company announcements recorded in Eurofound’s European Restructuring Monitor (ERM), alongside a new classification of restructuring events involving changes in company location.
Employers increasingly use tools such as email, SMS and messaging apps like WhatsApp or Signal to communicate with employees. While these technologies offer both efficiency and convenience, their use in communicating sensitive information, particularly for notifying employees of dismissal, raises legal concerns. This article explores the legal framework on dismissals across the EU, with a special focus on the use of digital means for communicating employment dismissals. Drawing on examples from various Member States, it examines the legal validity of digital dismissals.
In 2023, thousands of workers in big tech lost their jobs. Meta, Amazon, Google, Apple, Microsoft and Salesforce had been considered to offer good and secure jobs up to this point. Giants of the information and communication technology (ICT) sector, these companies are among the highest paying, with Eurostat data from 2022 indicating that workers in ICT had the second-highest median gross hourly earnings (surpassed only by earnings in the financial sector).[1] These layoffs were a shock, especially as the biggest companies had hired extensively during the COVID-19 pandemic. What happened in the two years after this redundancy wave – was that the end of the cuts or did the companies start expanding again?
In 2024, the automotive sector in the EU came to the fore in public and policy discussions. The focus was on the slowdown in electric vehicle (EV) sales, rising global competition, belated investments in new technologies, and the potential closure of production lines in Europe. A number of European car manufacturers and suppliers announced their intention to make large-scale redundancies and change long-standing collective agreements on job security and wages, while workers raised concerns amid demonstrations and industrial action.