Eurofound's ERM database on restructuring-related legal regulations provides
information on regulations in the Member States of the European Union and Norway
which are explicitly or implicitly linked to anticipating and managing change.
Austria: Employment protection in relation to business transfers
Phase
Employment Law Harmonisation Act
Native name
Arbeitsvertragsrechtsanpassungsgesetz (AVRAG)
Type
Employment protection in relation to business transfers
Added to database
19 September 2016
Article
3, 4, 5
Description
Transfer of business functions ('Funktionsnachfolge') do not qualify under this legislation, as the law only applies to the change of ownership ('Betriebsübergang') of an undertaking, business or part of a business. This is usually distinguished by the transfer of licences, patents, copyright, logistics systems, specific software or the transfer of more than 10% of employees.
Austrian courts have interpreted the meaning of transfer of undertakings in accordance with the European Court of Justice and use the following indicators:
the transfer covers an economic entity;
the undertaking retains its identity as an economic entity following the transaction;
tangible and/or intangible assets are transferred;
customers are transferred;
a significant number of employees (in number or expertise) are taken over.
According to AVRAG [§3] (AVRAG)), the new employer must take over all rights and obligations contained in each individual employment contract (including temporary and fixed-term contracts), if not indicated otherwise due to changes in the affiliation of the collective agreement (AVRAG § 4), the occupational pension schemes (AVRAG § 5) or work agreements (ArbVG, §§ 32, 33). Any changes to an employment contract can only be enacted by mutual agreement. However, this rule is not applicable in the case of compensation, which cannot be decreased under the new contract. Any liabilities resulting from the contract are also transferred. Obligations which arise during the period prior to transfer, the transferor and the transferee are jointly responsible for. If the transferee is subject to a collective agreement, this agreement tends to take precedence over agreements to which the transferor is subject, however, if the transferee is not subject to any collective agreement, the former agreement remains applicable. If the affiliation of collective agreements is changing, the favourability principle (‘Günstigkeitsprinzip’) does not apply except for wages for normal working hours. If the collective or work agreement after the transfer deteriorates working conditions substantially, employees are entitled to terminate the contract within one month without losing entitlements to benefits.
If dismissals occur within 6 to 9 months of the transfer, and the employee has some evidence that the dismissal was carried out in relation to the transfer, they can bring an action for declaratory judgement that the dismissal was based on the transfer and is therefore void.
All employees are covered by the act, including apprentices and executive staff members. All government employees are excluded.
Employees can object against the transfer in two cases (AVRAG §3 (4)). First, if the new owner refuses to agree to special protection against dismissal as detailed in a collective agreement that applied at the time of the transfer. Second, if the new owner refuses to take over the occupational pension fund. The employee must raise an objection within one month of such a refusal. In this case, the contract with the transferor remains intact.
The employer may refuse to take over a company pension commitment in some cases, for instance if the deal was an assets deal and not a case of universal succession. The employee is then entitled to object, and their employment contract is, in effect, not transferred.
Commentary
According to AVRAG §3 (2), regulations for changes of ownership do not apply in cases of reorganisation procedures without self-administration ('Sanierungsverfahren ohne Eigenverwaltung') as well as bankruptcy proceedings.
Areas of legal uncertainty regarding transfers of undertakings in Austria include:
whether certain circumstances and procedures are deemed to be transfers of undertakings which are subject to the Employment Law Harmonisation Act,
what kinds of agreements are considered void because they bypass mandatory protection provisions.
Additional metadata
Cost covered by
None
Involved actors other than national government
National government
Involvement (others)
None
Thresholds
Affected employees: No, applicable in all circumstances Company size: No, applicable in all circumstances Additional information: No, applicable in all circumstances
Eurofound (2016), Austria: Employment protection in relation to business transfers, Restructuring legislation database, Dublin,
https://apps.eurofound.europa.eu/legislationdb/employment-protection-in-relation-to-business-transfers/austria
While large-scale redundancies at major manufacturers dominate the headlines, the true impact of this restructuring is being felt most acutely within the wider supply chain. This article examines the uneven distribution of job losses, the growing geographical shifts in production, ...
Eurofound’s ERM restructuring legislation database offers an overview of key restructuring-related regulations in the EU Member States and Norway. Its content is continuously updated to reflect any changes made by national legislators in response to, for instance, policy shifts, legal ...
Can Europe still achieve its ambitions for battery manufacturing? To answer this, the article looks at data from Eurofound’s European Restructuring Monitor and explores what recent large-scale restructuring events reveal about the state of play in the EU battery sector.
This working paper offers a comprehensive methodological overview of the European Restructuring Monitor (ERM) databases. Even though the methodology has not changed over time, new categories have been added, and the way it has been used by researchers and policymakers ...