Eurofound's ERM database on restructuring-related legal regulations provides
information on regulations in the Member States of the European Union and Norway
which are explicitly or implicitly linked to anticipating and managing change.
Romania: Employee monitoring and surveillance
Phase
Law no 190/18 July 2018 on measures implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation)
Native name
Legea nr. 190 din 18 iulie 2018 privind măsuri de punere în aplicare a Regulamentului (UE) 2016/679 al Parlamentului European și al Consiliului din 27 aprilie 2016 privind protecția persoanelor fizice în ceea ce privește prelucrarea datelor cu caracter personal și privind libera circulație a acestor date și de abrogare a Directivei 95/46/CE (Regulamentul general privind protecția datelor)
Type
Employee monitoring and surveillance
Added to database
06 October 2023
Article
Law no 190/18 July 2018 [Legea nr. 190 din 18 iulie 2018] - 2, 5, 7, 14,
Description
LAST UPDATE 2023 - THIS CONTENT WILL NOT BE UPDATED
With the law, the processing of personal data is much better defined, the employee is protected against abuse by the employer. At the same time, employers are informed more specifically about how the law regulates the surveillance of employees, in order to have a balance between the two parties.
According to the provisions, the employer can monitor the work of employees only if the following conditions are met:
The employer has legitimate and well-founded interests that prevail over the interests or rights and freedoms of the employees.
The employer has informed in advance, in a precise and explicit manner how they wish to monitor the employees' activity.
The employer has consulted in advance with the trade union or employee representatives before implementing monitoring systems.
The employer ensured that the duration of storage of personal data is directly proportional to the purpose of the processing, without exceeding the legal time limit of 30 days. An exception is made in duly justified cases.
The law clearly specifies the employer's obligation to inform employees in advance of how they choose to monitor their activity. This can be done by following certain steps.
An e-mail will be sent to the employees informing them of the intention and the way in which the monitoring of their activity will be carried out.
The necessary changes will be made in the internal rules.
The necessary changes will be made in the additional documents to the employment contract.
Minutes will be drawn up and signed by all employees.
There are some situations in which the employer must justify the need to implement supervision systems. An example is GPS tracking of the transport vehicle or any other purpose for which the employee works. If there is no reason that would give the employer reason to suspect that the employee is carrying out illegal operations and activities with the company car, then the imposition of surveillance is not justified.
As far as surveillance cameras at the workplace are concerned, employees must be informed of their location and when they are active. It is forbidden to place hidden cameras, as it violates the employee's right to privacy, even if they are in the work space.
Commentary
The same applies to monitoring activity on the internet and generally on the work computer. This situation is quite delicate, because it is not possible to impose an exclusive control on the way the employee chooses to carry out their activity. Some people may take more frequent breaks and go on social networks, but they do what their work without any problems. In this case, too, the employer must have some justified suspicion that the employee is using the computer and internet for personal, abusive and illegal activities.
Additional metadata
Cost covered by
Companies
Employer
National government
Involved actors other than national government
Employer organisation
Trade union
Involvement (others)
None
Thresholds
Affected employees: No, applicable in all circumstances Company size: No, applicable in all circumstances Additional information: No, applicable in all circumstances
This Eurofound research paper explores key trends in restructuring in recent years, highlighting the companies that announced the largest job losses and job gains in the EU. It builds on an analysis of company announcements recorded in Eurofound’s European Restructuring Monitor (ERM), alongside a new classification of restructuring events involving changes in company location.
Employers increasingly use tools such as email, SMS and messaging apps like WhatsApp or Signal to communicate with employees. While these technologies offer both efficiency and convenience, their use in communicating sensitive information, particularly for notifying employees of dismissal, raises legal concerns. This article explores the legal framework on dismissals across the EU, with a special focus on the use of digital means for communicating employment dismissals. Drawing on examples from various Member States, it examines the legal validity of digital dismissals.
In 2023, thousands of workers in big tech lost their jobs. Meta, Amazon, Google, Apple, Microsoft and Salesforce had been considered to offer good and secure jobs up to this point. Giants of the information and communication technology (ICT) sector, these companies are among the highest paying, with Eurostat data from 2022 indicating that workers in ICT had the second-highest median gross hourly earnings (surpassed only by earnings in the financial sector).[1] These layoffs were a shock, especially as the biggest companies had hired extensively during the COVID-19 pandemic. What happened in the two years after this redundancy wave – was that the end of the cuts or did the companies start expanding again?
In 2024, the automotive sector in the EU came to the fore in public and policy discussions. The focus was on the slowdown in electric vehicle (EV) sales, rising global competition, belated investments in new technologies, and the potential closure of production lines in Europe. A number of European car manufacturers and suppliers announced their intention to make large-scale redundancies and change long-standing collective agreements on job security and wages, while workers raised concerns amid demonstrations and industrial action.