Eurofound's ERM database on restructuring-related legal regulations provides
information on regulations in the Member States of the European Union and Norway
which are explicitly or implicitly linked to anticipating and managing change.
Poland: Employee monitoring and surveillance
Phase
Act of 1 December 2022 amending the Act - Labour Code and certain other acts;
Act of 26 June 1974 Labour Code
Native name
Ustawa z dnia 1 grudnia 2022 r. o zmianie ustawy – Kodeks pracy oraz niektórych innych ustaw;
Ustawa z dnia 26 czerwca 1974 r. Kodeks pracy
Type
Employee monitoring and surveillance
Added to database
26 October 2023
Article
Art. 11(1), 21(1c), 22(1e), 22(1f), 22(3), 67(28) of Act of 26 June 1974 Labour Code;
Art. 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 14, 16, 17 of Act of 1 December 2022 amending the Act - Labour Code and certain other acts;
Description
LAST UPDATE 2023 - THIS CONTENT WILL NOT BE UPDATED
Sobriety checks
An employer may introduce sobriety checks for employees if this is necessary to ensure the protection of the life and health of employees or other persons or the protection of property. The conditions of the sobriety check must be laid down in a collective agreement or in the work rules or in a notice if the employer is not subject to a collective agreement or is not obliged to issue work rules.
Remote control of work
An employer has the right to carry out an inspection of the employee's remote work, a health and safety inspection or an inspection of compliance with security and information protection requirements, including procedures for the protection of personal data, under the terms of the remote work agreement between the employer and the employee. The inspection shall be carried out in agreement with the employee at the place of remote work during the employee's working hours. The monitoring shall not invade the privacy of the teleworking employee or any other person, nor interfere with the intended use of the home premises.
E-mail monitoring
If necessary to ensure that the work is organised in such a way that the working time can be fully utilised and the working tools are made available to the employee, the employer may introduce monitoring of the employee's business e-mails (e-mail monitoring, electronic mail monitoring). E-mail monitoring must not violate the employee's privacy and other personal rights.
Commentary
The employer must agree with the employee on the timing of the remote working check. The inspection shall take place during the employee's working hours. A negative inspection result allows the employer to revoke the permission to carry out remote working.
The employer is eligible (but not required) to impose a disciplinary sanction (a warning, a reprimand or a fine) on the intoxicated employee but also to terminate the employee's employment contract without notice through the employee's fault or with notice. The employer may apply one or both of these sanctions.
Additional metadata
Cost covered by
Companies
Employer
Involved actors other than national government
Trade union
Works council
Employer organisation
Involvement (others)
None
Thresholds
Affected employees: No, applicable in all circumstances Company size: No, applicable in all circumstances Additional information: No, applicable in all circumstances
This Eurofound research paper explores key trends in restructuring in recent years, highlighting the companies that announced the largest job losses and job gains in the EU. It builds on an analysis of company announcements recorded in Eurofound’s European Restructuring Monitor (ERM), alongside a new classification of restructuring events involving changes in company location.
Employers increasingly use tools such as email, SMS and messaging apps like WhatsApp or Signal to communicate with employees. While these technologies offer both efficiency and convenience, their use in communicating sensitive information, particularly for notifying employees of dismissal, raises legal concerns. This article explores the legal framework on dismissals across the EU, with a special focus on the use of digital means for communicating employment dismissals. Drawing on examples from various Member States, it examines the legal validity of digital dismissals.
In 2023, thousands of workers in big tech lost their jobs. Meta, Amazon, Google, Apple, Microsoft and Salesforce had been considered to offer good and secure jobs up to this point. Giants of the information and communication technology (ICT) sector, these companies are among the highest paying, with Eurostat data from 2022 indicating that workers in ICT had the second-highest median gross hourly earnings (surpassed only by earnings in the financial sector).[1] These layoffs were a shock, especially as the biggest companies had hired extensively during the COVID-19 pandemic. What happened in the two years after this redundancy wave – was that the end of the cuts or did the companies start expanding again?
In 2024, the automotive sector in the EU came to the fore in public and policy discussions. The focus was on the slowdown in electric vehicle (EV) sales, rising global competition, belated investments in new technologies, and the potential closure of production lines in Europe. A number of European car manufacturers and suppliers announced their intention to make large-scale redundancies and change long-standing collective agreements on job security and wages, while workers raised concerns amid demonstrations and industrial action.