Eurofound's ERM database on restructuring-related legal regulations provides
information on regulations in the Member States of the European Union and Norway
which are explicitly or implicitly linked to anticipating and managing change.
Hungary: Employee monitoring and surveillance
Phase
Act I of 2012 on the Labour Code
Native name
2012. évi I. törvény a Munka Törvénykönyvéről
Type
Employee monitoring and surveillance
Added to database
27 October 2023
Article
Article 11(a)
Description
LAST UPDATE 2023 - THIS CONTENT WILL NOT BE UPDATED
Under changes introduced in April 2019 to the Labour Code, providing more details on the rules on monitoring and surveillance, it is stated that the employer has a right to monitor whether employees are fulfilling their job-related tasks according to their instructions.
The employer may use technical equipment to exercise this right, but it must be justifiably in connection with the employee’s work and it must be proportionate. Such justification may be the protection of employer property, but surveillance cannot be used to measure employee productivity (for example by video surveillance). An exception may be when the surveillance serves the purpose of the health and safety of the employee, such as at an industrial site. Human dignity must be observed at all times, thus cameras cannot be placed in private spaces where the employee has the right to privacy and rest (showers and dressing rooms, kitchens or dining spaces, facilities for resting).
General GDPR rules must be observed when handling all data collected in this way and employees must be duly notified of any surveillance beforehand.
Commentary
The Hungarian National Authority for Data Protection and Freedom of Information (NAIH) is authorised to impose fines for breaches of these rules. The largest fine related to data protection imposed in 2022 was HUF 250 million (€658,000). This case was related to the data handling and analysis of Budapest Bank related to recordings of telephone calls received by its call centre between May 2018 and September 2021. NAIH found it especially problematic that the analysis of the calls included examining the emotional states and reactions of participants in the call, which is in breach of handling data of clients as well as employees and rules on obtaining informed consent.
Additional metadata
Cost covered by
None
Involved actors other than national government
Other
Involvement (others)
Hungarian National Authority for Data Protection and Freedom of Information (NAIH)
Thresholds
Affected employees: No, applicable in all circumstances Company size: No, applicable in all circumstances Additional information: No, applicable in all circumstances
This Eurofound research paper explores key trends in restructuring in recent years, highlighting the companies that announced the largest job losses and job gains in the EU. It builds on an analysis of company announcements recorded in Eurofound’s European Restructuring Monitor (ERM), alongside a new classification of restructuring events involving changes in company location.
Employers increasingly use tools such as email, SMS and messaging apps like WhatsApp or Signal to communicate with employees. While these technologies offer both efficiency and convenience, their use in communicating sensitive information, particularly for notifying employees of dismissal, raises legal concerns. This article explores the legal framework on dismissals across the EU, with a special focus on the use of digital means for communicating employment dismissals. Drawing on examples from various Member States, it examines the legal validity of digital dismissals.
In 2023, thousands of workers in big tech lost their jobs. Meta, Amazon, Google, Apple, Microsoft and Salesforce had been considered to offer good and secure jobs up to this point. Giants of the information and communication technology (ICT) sector, these companies are among the highest paying, with Eurostat data from 2022 indicating that workers in ICT had the second-highest median gross hourly earnings (surpassed only by earnings in the financial sector).[1] These layoffs were a shock, especially as the biggest companies had hired extensively during the COVID-19 pandemic. What happened in the two years after this redundancy wave – was that the end of the cuts or did the companies start expanding again?
In 2024, the automotive sector in the EU came to the fore in public and policy discussions. The focus was on the slowdown in electric vehicle (EV) sales, rising global competition, belated investments in new technologies, and the potential closure of production lines in Europe. A number of European car manufacturers and suppliers announced their intention to make large-scale redundancies and change long-standing collective agreements on job security and wages, while workers raised concerns amid demonstrations and industrial action.