European Restructuring Monitor (ERM)
Eurofound's ERM database on restructuring-related legal regulations provides information on regulations in the Member States of the European Union and Norway which are explicitly or implicitly linked to anticipating and managing change.
Personal Data Protection Act Chapter 2 Employment Contracts Act Chapter 2, section 11 - data collection of a potential employment Employment Contracts Act Chapter 3, Division 2, section 28(2)11) - Employer's obligation to respect employee's privacy Employment Contracts Act Chapter 3, Division 2, section 41
LAST UPDATE 2023 - THIS CONTENT WILL NOT BE UPDATED
An employer will always possess an employee’s personal and work-related data, but there are regulations to the usage of that data. Trust and mutual understanding provides a foundation to a good employment relationship. This puts the principle of data processing with the knowledge of the employee in high importance. In legal terms, an employer must ensure the processing of personal data of an employee in accordance with the Personal Data Protection Act. Personal data are any data concerning an identified or identifiable natural person, regardless of the form or format in which such data exist.
The Employment Contracts Act obliges employers to respect employee privacy and control fulfilment of job tasks without unnecessary measures. Employers have the right to process employee data without employees' consent as long as it is necessary to fill employment contract and work arrangements rules at the workplace. This data however, must be collected only in legal and fair ways. At the same time, employees have the right to ask and receive information on what kind and on what purpose is information collected on them and who has access to that data (Personal Data Protection Act). An employee also has a right to demand a change or removal of false information collected about them. The data of an employee can only be processed if they have been given an opportunity to give consent which can also be withdrawn at any moment. If an employee withdraws their consent, the employer has to stop processing that data.
In addition, the employer does not have the right to carry out couvert surveillance on their employees. If there are cameras used in the office, all employees need to have knowledge of that, which needs to be clear and unambiguous. In the case of privacy violation due to collection of data, the subject can demand compensation. Surveillance cameras can only be used for the protection of people and property, not for collecting data on the quality and quantity of the work carried out by the employees. The employer has no right to collect data of the employees outside of working hours and must provide access to the materials (including recordings) at all times if the employee finds it necessary.
However, if the employee uses computers or other devices provided by the workplace, the data collected from there can be used without consent, but this should be specifically mentioned in the work contract. Also, the employer has a right to prohibit the use of work computers or other devices for personal use but this should again be stated in the work contract.
The processing and protection of an employee's private information has been the main area of concern for the Data Protection Inspectorate in Estonia. In the case of unavoidable data processing due to the contract or the law, the lines for asking for consent get very blurry. For example, processing data about an employee's child for childcare leave purposes does not require consent, even if the child is a minor. For further processing of the data related to the employee's children, consent is required.
In addition, due to increased demand for telework due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the relation to monitoring at work has also changed. In many cases the employers started to use extra monitoring tools for employees working from home to control their working activity and productivity. In most cases automatic, AI related tools were used, which is often failing to identify between personal and work-related data while collecting. Also, even though the pandemic has ended, many companies have continued to use the surveillance tools, which still leave ambiguous situations in relation to the Data Protection Act.
Overall, there is currently very little data collected on this topic in Estonia. In the case of privacy invasion or other guideline violation, the Labour Inspectorate should be contacted and they will look at every case separately.
Eurofound (2023), Estonia: Employee monitoring and surveillance, Restructuring legislation database, Dublin, https://apps.eurofound.europa.eu/legislationdb/employee-monitoring-and-surveillance/estonia
This Eurofound research paper explores key trends in restructuring in recent years, highlighting the companies that announced the largest job losses and job gains in the EU. It builds on an analysis of company announcements recorded in Eurofound’s European Restructuring Monitor (ERM), alongside a new classification of restructuring events involving changes in company location.
:quality(80))
Employers increasingly use tools such as email, SMS and messaging apps like WhatsApp or Signal to communicate with employees. While these technologies offer both efficiency and convenience, their use in communicating sensitive information, particularly for notifying employees of dismissal, raises legal concerns. This article explores the legal framework on dismissals across the EU, with a special focus on the use of digital means for communicating employment dismissals. Drawing on examples from various Member States, it examines the legal validity of digital dismissals.
:quality(80))
In 2023, thousands of workers in big tech lost their jobs. Meta, Amazon, Google, Apple, Microsoft and Salesforce had been considered to offer good and secure jobs up to this point. Giants of the information and communication technology (ICT) sector, these companies are among the highest paying, with Eurostat data from 2022 indicating that workers in ICT had the second-highest median gross hourly earnings (surpassed only by earnings in the financial sector).[1] These layoffs were a shock, especially as the biggest companies had hired extensively during the COVID-19 pandemic. What happened in the two years after this redundancy wave – was that the end of the cuts or did the companies start expanding again?
:quality(80))
In 2024, the automotive sector in the EU came to the fore in public and policy discussions. The focus was on the slowdown in electric vehicle (EV) sales, rising global competition, belated investments in new technologies, and the potential closure of production lines in Europe. A number of European car manufacturers and suppliers announced their intention to make large-scale redundancies and change long-standing collective agreements on job security and wages, while workers raised concerns amid demonstrations and industrial action.
:quality(80))